RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    은유표현의 특성이 이해과정에 미치는 영향 연구 : 비교이론과 범주포함이론을 중심으로 = Influences of metaphor's characteristics on metaphor understanding process

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8072101

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the present study is suggesting the unified theory of metaphor understanding by combining comparison theory (including structure-mapping theory) with class-inclusion theory.
    Metaphor's diverse characteristics lead researchers to contrary conclusions on metaphor understanding process in experiments. So, this study demands in advance 1) rating a metaphoric expressions according to four psychological characteristic scales related to metaphor; EASE OF INTERPRETATION, GOODNESS, FELT FAMILARITY, and METAPHORICITY, 2) revealing relationships between them.
    The rated items(N = 54) were conventional metaphors or new expressions made by the researcher. Means of ratings in each dimension are presented at Appendix 1. Analysis showed significant correlations between rated dimensions, excepting EASE OF INTERPRETATION and METAPHORICITY(r = .046). These results corresponded to metaphor theories' predictions partially. And, according to metaphor theories metaphor expression is comprehended in different ways. Thus, these demonstrate that metaphors' characteristics are so diverse as to be comprehended through very different cognitive processes.
    Then, we divided metaphors into two groups according to EASE OF INTERPRETATION ratings or METAPHORICITY ratings. And, averages of SIMILARITY ratings and NUMBERs of TOPICS was computed for each groups (Appendix 2). Both two groups' SIMILARITY means and NUMBERs of TOPIC were compared each other. Results show that EASE OF INTERPRETATION is related to SIMILARITY(t = 4.783, p < .001) and METAPHORICITY is related to NUMBERs of TOPICs(t = 2.239, p < .05). Results supported comparison theory partially. So did class-inclusion theory. To overcome this problem, it is looked out for how to apply structural-alignment mechanism to creating a suitable attributive category of a vehicle. The proposed unified model of metaphor understanding considers the role of similarity between topic and vehicle, and effects of vehicle typicality in an attributive category.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the present study is suggesting the unified theory of metaphor understanding by combining comparison theory (including structure-mapping theory) with class-inclusion theory. Metaphor's diverse characteristics lead researchers to contra...

    The purpose of the present study is suggesting the unified theory of metaphor understanding by combining comparison theory (including structure-mapping theory) with class-inclusion theory.
    Metaphor's diverse characteristics lead researchers to contrary conclusions on metaphor understanding process in experiments. So, this study demands in advance 1) rating a metaphoric expressions according to four psychological characteristic scales related to metaphor; EASE OF INTERPRETATION, GOODNESS, FELT FAMILARITY, and METAPHORICITY, 2) revealing relationships between them.
    The rated items(N = 54) were conventional metaphors or new expressions made by the researcher. Means of ratings in each dimension are presented at Appendix 1. Analysis showed significant correlations between rated dimensions, excepting EASE OF INTERPRETATION and METAPHORICITY(r = .046). These results corresponded to metaphor theories' predictions partially. And, according to metaphor theories metaphor expression is comprehended in different ways. Thus, these demonstrate that metaphors' characteristics are so diverse as to be comprehended through very different cognitive processes.
    Then, we divided metaphors into two groups according to EASE OF INTERPRETATION ratings or METAPHORICITY ratings. And, averages of SIMILARITY ratings and NUMBERs of TOPICS was computed for each groups (Appendix 2). Both two groups' SIMILARITY means and NUMBERs of TOPIC were compared each other. Results show that EASE OF INTERPRETATION is related to SIMILARITY(t = 4.783, p < .001) and METAPHORICITY is related to NUMBERs of TOPICs(t = 2.239, p < .05). Results supported comparison theory partially. So did class-inclusion theory. To overcome this problem, it is looked out for how to apply structural-alignment mechanism to creating a suitable attributive category of a vehicle. The proposed unified model of metaphor understanding considers the role of similarity between topic and vehicle, and effects of vehicle typicality in an attributive category.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 초록 = 4
    • 1. 서론 = 9
    • 1.1 연구배경 = 9
    • 1.2 연구목적 및 필요성 = 16
    • 1.3 논문구성 = 19
    • 초록 = 4
    • 1. 서론 = 9
    • 1.1 연구배경 = 9
    • 1.2 연구목적 및 필요성 = 16
    • 1.3 논문구성 = 19
    • 2. 은유 이해의 심리과정 이론 = 20
    • 2.1 은유표현 이해의 특징 = 20
    • 2.2 은유표현 이해과정에 관한 연구들 = 22
    • 2.2.1 현저성불균형 이론 = 24
    • 2.2.2 구조사상이론 = 26
    • 2.2.3 범주포함이론 = 33
    • 2.3 은유표현의 특성 차원에 대한 연구들 = 39
    • 3. 설문조사연구 = 44
    • 3.1 설문 조사 목적 = 44
    • 3.2 은유표현에 대한 특성 차원별 평정 점수 및 상관 = 45
    • 3.2.1 방법 = 45
    • 3.2.2 결과 및 논의 = 47
    • 4. 해석용이성과 은유풍부성이 유사성과 화제 생성 수에 미치는 영향 = 50
    • 4.1 분석 방법 = 52
    • 4.2 결과 및 논의 = 52
    • 5. 전체논의및결론 = 56
    • 참고문헌 = 61
    • 부록 = 70
    • Abstract = 77
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼