RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    초등영재교육의 판별.교육프로그램과 운영에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8044857

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대구 : 대구敎育大學校, 2001

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2001

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      379.29

    • 발행국(도시)

      대구

    • 형태사항

      iv,131p.: 삽도 ; 26cm

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌:p.124-128

    • 소장기관
      • 강원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립경국대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립금오공과대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 대구교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 부산교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 서울교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 안동과학대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한국교원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study was carried out to understand problems of the elementary gifted education in korea and to suggest plans for its improvement. It was also performed to give a basic data for activation of the elementary gifted education.
    The research method of this study was a literature review. Only written documents were collected and used in this study without an interview or a visit. Throughout this study, situations about the discrimination of the gifted, the programs for the gifted, and the types of the administration of elementary gifted education at home and abroad were presented. Moreover, the problems and plans for improvement about them were showed.
    The research method of this study was a literature review. Only written documents were collected and used in this study without an interview or a visit. Throughout this study, situations about the discrimination of the gifted, the programs for the gifted, and the types of the administration of elementary gifted education at home and abroad were presented. Moreover, the problems and plans for improvement about them were showed.
    The results analyzed in this study were as follows ;
    1) In cases of abroad, committee for discrimination of the gifted join with levels from local school curriculums to national dimension and a variety of scales and tests are being used. On the other hand, in korea, general school hardly do not execute a professional discrimination of the gifted except schools for study.
    2) In cases of abroad, acceleration and enrichment programs are being operated in all curriculums. Government also is involved in developing and supporting education program for the gifted. On the other hand, in korea, enrichment programs is limited to only language, mathematics and science for examples and education programs for the gifted is scarcely developed.
    3) In cases of abroad, governments in most countries are administrating a sort of permanent classes and special classes for the gifted. On the other hand, in korea, only schools for study are operating a kind of enrichment education classes for examples.
    On the basis of the above results, suggestions about plans for the improvement of the elementary gifted education in korea were as follows ;
    1) On the discrimination of the gifted, a variety of instruments for discrimination have to be developed and applied to diverse areas. Also early discovery of the gifted need to be made and a professional school committee for discrimination need to be established.
    2) On the programs for the gifted, teaching by experts every division of the gifted education, establishments of various gifted educations, reduction of the number of students in class, a broad application of the gifted education to students, and the provision of various teaching-learning methods are needed.
    3) On the types of the administration of elementary gifted education, legal and institutional devices, administrative and financial supporting systems, development and application of high quality programs for the gifted are needed.
    In conclusion, it can be suggested that if the administration of elementary gifted education in korea was improved on sites of discrimination of the gifted, programs for the gifted, and types of its administration, more effective and professional elementary gifted education would be settled down and conducted.
    번역하기

    This study was carried out to understand problems of the elementary gifted education in korea and to suggest plans for its improvement. It was also performed to give a basic data for activation of the elementary gifted education. The research metho...

    This study was carried out to understand problems of the elementary gifted education in korea and to suggest plans for its improvement. It was also performed to give a basic data for activation of the elementary gifted education.
    The research method of this study was a literature review. Only written documents were collected and used in this study without an interview or a visit. Throughout this study, situations about the discrimination of the gifted, the programs for the gifted, and the types of the administration of elementary gifted education at home and abroad were presented. Moreover, the problems and plans for improvement about them were showed.
    The research method of this study was a literature review. Only written documents were collected and used in this study without an interview or a visit. Throughout this study, situations about the discrimination of the gifted, the programs for the gifted, and the types of the administration of elementary gifted education at home and abroad were presented. Moreover, the problems and plans for improvement about them were showed.
    The results analyzed in this study were as follows ;
    1) In cases of abroad, committee for discrimination of the gifted join with levels from local school curriculums to national dimension and a variety of scales and tests are being used. On the other hand, in korea, general school hardly do not execute a professional discrimination of the gifted except schools for study.
    2) In cases of abroad, acceleration and enrichment programs are being operated in all curriculums. Government also is involved in developing and supporting education program for the gifted. On the other hand, in korea, enrichment programs is limited to only language, mathematics and science for examples and education programs for the gifted is scarcely developed.
    3) In cases of abroad, governments in most countries are administrating a sort of permanent classes and special classes for the gifted. On the other hand, in korea, only schools for study are operating a kind of enrichment education classes for examples.
    On the basis of the above results, suggestions about plans for the improvement of the elementary gifted education in korea were as follows ;
    1) On the discrimination of the gifted, a variety of instruments for discrimination have to be developed and applied to diverse areas. Also early discovery of the gifted need to be made and a professional school committee for discrimination need to be established.
    2) On the programs for the gifted, teaching by experts every division of the gifted education, establishments of various gifted educations, reduction of the number of students in class, a broad application of the gifted education to students, and the provision of various teaching-learning methods are needed.
    3) On the types of the administration of elementary gifted education, legal and institutional devices, administrative and financial supporting systems, development and application of high quality programs for the gifted are needed.
    In conclusion, it can be suggested that if the administration of elementary gifted education in korea was improved on sites of discrimination of the gifted, programs for the gifted, and types of its administration, more effective and professional elementary gifted education would be settled down and conducted.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 3
    • 3. 연구 내용 = 4
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 5
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 3
    • 3. 연구 내용 = 4
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 영재와 영재교육 = 7
    • 1. 영재 = 7
    • 가. 영재의 정의 = 7
    • 나. 영재의 특성 = 10
    • 2. 영재교육 = 15
    • 가. 영재교육의 개념 = 15
    • 나. 영재교육의 필요성 = 16
    • Ⅲ. 초등학교 영재 판별 = 18
    • 1. 초등학교 영재 판별의 이론 = 18
    • 가. 초등학교 영재 판별의 원칙 = 18
    • 나. 초등학교 영재 판별 도구 = 23
    • 다. 초등학교 영재 판별 절차 = 29
    • 2. 초등학교 영재 판별의 실제 = 32
    • 가. 외국의 영재 판별 고찰 = 32
    • 나. 한국 영재교육 연구학교의 판별 고찰 = 39
    • 다. 한국 지역공동 및 대학부설 영재반의 판별 고찰 = 44
    • 라. 한국 일반 초등학교의 영재 판별 고찰 = 46
    • 3. 요약 및 논의 = 47
    • Ⅳ. 초등학교 영재교육 프로그램 = 54
    • 1. 초등학교 영재교육 프로그램의 유형 = 54
    • 가. 속진 프로그램 = 55
    • 나. 심화학습 프로그램 = 59
    • 2. 초등학교 영재교육 프로그램의 실제 = 62
    • 가. 외국의 영재교육 프로그램 고찰 = 63
    • 나. 한국 영재교육 연구학교의 프로그램 고찰 = 66
    • 다. 한국 일반 초등학교 영재교육 프로그램 고찰 = 74
    • 3. 요약 및 논의 = 79
    • Ⅴ. 초등학교 영재교육 운영 형태 = 88
    • 1. 초등학교 영재교육의 일반적 운영 형태 = 88
    • 가. 상설 영재학급 = 89
    • 나. 정규수업 내 시간제 영재학급 = 90
    • 다. 특별활동 영재학급 = 91
    • 라. 방과 후, 주말, 방학 영재학급 = 93
    • 2. 초등학교 영재교육의 운영 형태의 실제 = 94
    • 가. 외국의 영재교육 운영 형태 고찰 = 94
    • 나. 한국 영재교육 연구학교의 운영 형태 고찰 = 100
    • 다. 한국 일반 초등학교 영재교육 운영 형태 고찰 = 107
    • 3. 요약 및 논의 = 113
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 = 120
    • 1. 결론 = 120
    • 2. 제언 = 122
    • 참고문헌 = 124
    • 영문초록 = 129
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼