RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      유아의 창의성 수준에 따른 사회가상놀이에서의 의사소통방법 = Mutual Understanding Strategy Used by Children Who Did Social Pretend Play According to Children's Creativity

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T7931020

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to investigate correlation between children's creativity level and 7 strategies of paralinguistic cues, descriptions of action, repetition, semantic ties, calls for attention, directions, and tags used by children who did social pretend play.
      The subjects of this study were 54 children from a kindergarten attached to S elementary school located in Suwon city, Kyungi Province. The final subjects were 20 selected children including 10 children who were high on creativity level and 10 children who were low on creativity level among 50 children through creativity test and they were asked to have social pretend play. The findings of this study as below:
      First, children who were high on creativity level used descriptions of acting the most as they're doing social pretend play whereas children who were low on creativity level used paralinguistic cues the most. Children who were high on creativity level used directives more often than children who were low on creativity level, while the latter used calls for attention more often than the former. Both of them used tags the least.
      Second, boys and girls, all of them used paralinguistic cues the most and tags the least. Accordingly, there's no significant difference by gender.
      The above mentioned findings suggested that there's a significant difference according to children's creativity level to use mutual understanding strategy while they were doing social pretend play. However, there's no significant difference by gender.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to investigate correlation between children's creativity level and 7 strategies of paralinguistic cues, descriptions of action, repetition, semantic ties, calls for attention, directions, and tags used by children who did...

      The purpose of this study was to investigate correlation between children's creativity level and 7 strategies of paralinguistic cues, descriptions of action, repetition, semantic ties, calls for attention, directions, and tags used by children who did social pretend play.
      The subjects of this study were 54 children from a kindergarten attached to S elementary school located in Suwon city, Kyungi Province. The final subjects were 20 selected children including 10 children who were high on creativity level and 10 children who were low on creativity level among 50 children through creativity test and they were asked to have social pretend play. The findings of this study as below:
      First, children who were high on creativity level used descriptions of acting the most as they're doing social pretend play whereas children who were low on creativity level used paralinguistic cues the most. Children who were high on creativity level used directives more often than children who were low on creativity level, while the latter used calls for attention more often than the former. Both of them used tags the least.
      Second, boys and girls, all of them used paralinguistic cues the most and tags the least. Accordingly, there's no significant difference by gender.
      The above mentioned findings suggested that there's a significant difference according to children's creativity level to use mutual understanding strategy while they were doing social pretend play. However, there's no significant difference by gender.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = i
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 =1
      • 2. 연구 가설 = 4
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 5
      • 목차 = i
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 =1
      • 2. 연구 가설 = 4
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 5
      • II. 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 1. 창의성 = 6
      • 2. 사회가상놀이에서의 의사소통방법 = 17
      • 3. 선행연구 고찰 = 27
      • III. 연구방법 = 31
      • 1. 연구대상 = 31
      • 2. 연구도구 = 31
      • 3. 연구절차 = 35
      • 4. 자료처리 = 40
      • IV. 결과 및 논의 = 41
      • V. 결론 및 제언 = 47
      • 1. 결론 = 47
      • 2. 제언 = 49
      • 참고문헌 = 57
      • 부록 = 60
      • ABSTRACT = 79
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼