RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    열린교육 정책에 나타난 국가의 교육 통제 방식

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T7901446

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대구 : 대구敎育大學校, 2001

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2001

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      373

    • 발행국(도시)

      대구

    • 형태사항

      iv,72p.: 삽도 ; 26cm

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌:p.67-70

    • 소장기관
      • 강원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립경국대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 대구교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 동신대학교 학술문화정보원 소장기관정보
      • 서울교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In Korea, neo-liberalism and globalization has been continued since 1990s. The realm of education has also undergone the open education whirlpool since 1990s. The purpose of this thesis is to grasp way of the state's education control appeared in the open education policy. The problems established to accomplish this purpose are as follows. Firstly, What are the characteristics of the state in late capitalism and the background of the open education policy? Secondly, What are ways of the state's education control appeared in the open education policy?
    The conclusions based on the Offe's selectiveness of the state in late capitalism and the background of the open education policy are as follows. First, the dominant discussion of the Korea government's policy in 1990s is neo-liberalism but the characteristics of state is late capitalism. Moreover the state present subordinate characteristics. Second, it exists the same quality between the open education and neo-liberalism. Third, the open education movement proceeds from civilian's spontaneous activity in late 1980s to the government's policy in 1990s. The state selected open education as the government's policy to extend neo-liberalism ideology.
    According to four-levels filter system of Offe's political selectiveness, it can be concluded as follows. State's education control may be considered in the aspect of method and characteristics. First, in the level of structure the government made institutional foundation. which gives the relative autonomy to the rights of the capital and citizen society through the change of system.
    Second, in the level of ideology, it had not only the teachers receive the open education without criticism, by the encouragement of learning policy, the trail of the open education, the development, of materials and so on, but also informs the teachers of the merit only of ideology of neo-liberalism.
    Third, in the level of process, it participates in proceeding that the policy of open education is made and carried out, so only the merit of the open education is selected, though there are many faults in the open education.
    Fourth, in the level of repression, it makes the repressive situation all sorts of institution or teachers must so that do open education by that select superior institution or human resources through physical device - like that synthetic assessment of educational institution, public subscription, and various competitions - and allow financial support or personnel benefit.
    Four-levels filter system operate not only separately each other but also conjointly. Also, each thing acts himself every time he needs. In this processing, the state select and exclude properly by net of neo-liberalism after systematize a filtering system that is a series of good construction.
    Next, in the aspect of characteristics, the Korean educational situation in 1990s switches over from centralizing state's control by fascism to decentralizing state's control that gives relative and autonomy in education under limited state's control. Centralizing state's control is the directly and heteronomous, but decentralizing state's control is indirectly and permitted autonomy by influence of capital. In background the change of characteristics, capital accumulation under the capitalistic system is hidden and the state selects open education as a means of justification.
    번역하기

    In Korea, neo-liberalism and globalization has been continued since 1990s. The realm of education has also undergone the open education whirlpool since 1990s. The purpose of this thesis is to grasp way of the state's education control appeared in the...

    In Korea, neo-liberalism and globalization has been continued since 1990s. The realm of education has also undergone the open education whirlpool since 1990s. The purpose of this thesis is to grasp way of the state's education control appeared in the open education policy. The problems established to accomplish this purpose are as follows. Firstly, What are the characteristics of the state in late capitalism and the background of the open education policy? Secondly, What are ways of the state's education control appeared in the open education policy?
    The conclusions based on the Offe's selectiveness of the state in late capitalism and the background of the open education policy are as follows. First, the dominant discussion of the Korea government's policy in 1990s is neo-liberalism but the characteristics of state is late capitalism. Moreover the state present subordinate characteristics. Second, it exists the same quality between the open education and neo-liberalism. Third, the open education movement proceeds from civilian's spontaneous activity in late 1980s to the government's policy in 1990s. The state selected open education as the government's policy to extend neo-liberalism ideology.
    According to four-levels filter system of Offe's political selectiveness, it can be concluded as follows. State's education control may be considered in the aspect of method and characteristics. First, in the level of structure the government made institutional foundation. which gives the relative autonomy to the rights of the capital and citizen society through the change of system.
    Second, in the level of ideology, it had not only the teachers receive the open education without criticism, by the encouragement of learning policy, the trail of the open education, the development, of materials and so on, but also informs the teachers of the merit only of ideology of neo-liberalism.
    Third, in the level of process, it participates in proceeding that the policy of open education is made and carried out, so only the merit of the open education is selected, though there are many faults in the open education.
    Fourth, in the level of repression, it makes the repressive situation all sorts of institution or teachers must so that do open education by that select superior institution or human resources through physical device - like that synthetic assessment of educational institution, public subscription, and various competitions - and allow financial support or personnel benefit.
    Four-levels filter system operate not only separately each other but also conjointly. Also, each thing acts himself every time he needs. In this processing, the state select and exclude properly by net of neo-liberalism after systematize a filtering system that is a series of good construction.
    Next, in the aspect of characteristics, the Korean educational situation in 1990s switches over from centralizing state's control by fascism to decentralizing state's control that gives relative and autonomy in education under limited state's control. Centralizing state's control is the directly and heteronomous, but decentralizing state's control is indirectly and permitted autonomy by influence of capital. In background the change of characteristics, capital accumulation under the capitalistic system is hidden and the state selects open education as a means of justification.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 자본주의 국가의 성격과 국가의 통제 방식 = 4
    • 1. 자본주의 국가의 성격과 교육 = 4
    • 2. 자본주의 국가의 통제 방식으로서의 선택 = 10
    • Ⅲ. 열린교육 정책 선택의 배경 = 19
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 자본주의 국가의 성격과 국가의 통제 방식 = 4
    • 1. 자본주의 국가의 성격과 교육 = 4
    • 2. 자본주의 국가의 통제 방식으로서의 선택 = 10
    • Ⅲ. 열린교육 정책 선택의 배경 = 19
    • 1. 열린교육 정책 선택의 정치, 경제적 배경 = 19
    • 2. 신자유주의와 열린교육의 동질성 = 27
    • 3. 열린교육 정책 선택의 주도 세력 = 30
    • 가. 민간 세력 주도의 풀뿌리 운동 시기 = 32
    • 나. 국가 세력에 의한 교육 통제 시기 = 35
    • Ⅳ. 열린교육 정책과 국가의 교육 통제 = 39
    • 1. 구조 차원 = 39
    • 2. 이데올로기 차원 = 44
    • 3. 과정 차원 = 50
    • 4. 억압 차원 = 55
    • Ⅴ. 결론 = 64
    • 참고문헌 = 67
    • 영문초록 = 71
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼