RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      독서 능력 향상을 위한 독서 토론 프로그램 개발 및 적용 연구 : 중학교 2.3학년용 = A study of program development and application of reading debate for the improvement of reading ability :the second and third grade students

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T7891570

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      While the second and third grade students of middle schools are in the important period when their thinking abilities are being actively developed as well as their senses of values are being built, they don't read books much.
      That is because they are not interested in reading, and one of its reasons is the lack of reading ability. So a 20 hour-program for reading debate was developed in order to improve students' reading ability.
      Through studying and analyzing literatures, it is determined that the factors of reading ability are comprehension ability, critical ability, and expression ability ; the contents of a program to improve reading ability are organized with a teaching-learning curriculum and a debate workbook. The debate workbook consists of <understanding contents> which is to read the contents of materials and analyze it ; <thinking more> which is to criticize a story based on its analyzed contents ; <debating> which is to debate on the extracted issues from the process of analyzing reading materials.
      The developed program applied to reading debate classes which are organized in the form of a group with same purpose, a specialty and aptitude class and a special activity class, respectively. While applying the program to students, they were observed, interviewed, and inquired using questionnaires in order to grasp the students' opinions exactly. The analyzed results are as follows.
      1. The level of program contents
      The level of contents of reading materials is considered to be comparatively appropriate as those are selected from the recommended book list for the second and third grade students.
      2. The properness of program hour
      The hour for reading debate program was developed on the basis of 2 hours per one reading material, which seems to be appropriate, while the more a group has reading interest the more they feel it long and the less a group has the interest the more they feels it short.
      3. The part of most interest among the debate workbooks
      Of three realms of debate workbooks, <understanding contents>, <thinking more>, and <debating>, all of the three classes are interested in them in order of <debating>, <thinking more>, and <understanding contents>.
      4. The improvement of reading ability
      Reading ability was defined as comprehension ability about contents, critical ability in various points of view, and expression ability describing oneself's opinion or feeling, and when analyzing the change thereafter, the program appeared to be effective for those three abilities.
      번역하기

      While the second and third grade students of middle schools are in the important period when their thinking abilities are being actively developed as well as their senses of values are being built, they don't read books much. That is because they are...

      While the second and third grade students of middle schools are in the important period when their thinking abilities are being actively developed as well as their senses of values are being built, they don't read books much.
      That is because they are not interested in reading, and one of its reasons is the lack of reading ability. So a 20 hour-program for reading debate was developed in order to improve students' reading ability.
      Through studying and analyzing literatures, it is determined that the factors of reading ability are comprehension ability, critical ability, and expression ability ; the contents of a program to improve reading ability are organized with a teaching-learning curriculum and a debate workbook. The debate workbook consists of <understanding contents> which is to read the contents of materials and analyze it ; <thinking more> which is to criticize a story based on its analyzed contents ; <debating> which is to debate on the extracted issues from the process of analyzing reading materials.
      The developed program applied to reading debate classes which are organized in the form of a group with same purpose, a specialty and aptitude class and a special activity class, respectively. While applying the program to students, they were observed, interviewed, and inquired using questionnaires in order to grasp the students' opinions exactly. The analyzed results are as follows.
      1. The level of program contents
      The level of contents of reading materials is considered to be comparatively appropriate as those are selected from the recommended book list for the second and third grade students.
      2. The properness of program hour
      The hour for reading debate program was developed on the basis of 2 hours per one reading material, which seems to be appropriate, while the more a group has reading interest the more they feel it long and the less a group has the interest the more they feels it short.
      3. The part of most interest among the debate workbooks
      Of three realms of debate workbooks, <understanding contents>, <thinking more>, and <debating>, all of the three classes are interested in them in order of <debating>, <thinking more>, and <understanding contents>.
      4. The improvement of reading ability
      Reading ability was defined as comprehension ability about contents, critical ability in various points of view, and expression ability describing oneself's opinion or feeling, and when analyzing the change thereafter, the program appeared to be effective for those three abilities.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구 문제 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 4
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구 문제 = 3
      • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 4
      • 1. 독서의 개념과 의의 = 4
      • 2. 중학생의 발달 특성 및 독서 실태 = 5
      • 3. 독서 능력의 개념 및 구성 요소 = 11
      • 4. 독서 능력 향상을 위한 독서 토론 = 16
      • Ⅲ. 독서 토론 프로그램의 개발 원칙 및 실제 = 29
      • 1. 독서 토론 수업 모형 정립 = 29
      • 2. 프로그램 개발 원칙 = 30
      • 3. 개발 프로그램의 실제 = 34
      • Ⅳ. 독서 토론 프로그램의 실험 적용 및 효과 분석 = 37
      • 1. 프로그램 적용을 위한 독서토론반 조직 절차 = 37
      • 2. 효과 분석 방법 = 42
      • 3. 적용 결과 분석 및 해석 = 43
      • Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 = 65
      • 1. 요약 = 65
      • 2. 결론 = 67
      • 참고문헌 = 69
      • ABSTRACT = 73
      • 부록목차 = 76
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼