'The purpose of this study is to compare the specific character of health and isokinetic strength in elite and non-elite female gymnasts. Shoulder joint, hip joint, flexion of wrist joing, peak torque of extension, average power and so on are measured...
'The purpose of this study is to compare the specific character of health and isokinetic strength in elite and non-elite female gymnasts. Shoulder joint, hip joint, flexion of wrist joing, peak torque of extension, average power and so on are measured using Cybex 770 dynamometer. The results of two groups are compared. The results are as follow.
1. Back strength is higher significant(p<.001) comparing with control.
2. Flexion at Peak torque of shoulder at 60deg/sec in female gymnast is highly significant(p<.05) comparing with control. Extension at perk torque of shoulder at
60deg/sec, 180deg/sec in female gymnast is highly significant(p<.05) comparing with control.
3. Flexion at peak torque % body weight of shoulder ratio at 60deg/sec, 180deg/sec is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05) comparing with control.
Flexion at peak torque % body weight of hip ratio at 60 deg/sec, 180deg/sec, 240deg/sec
in female gymnasts is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05) comparing with control.
Extension at ratio of shoulder, hip and wrist at 60deg/sec, 180deg/sec in female gymnasts is highly significant(p<.05) comparing with control.
4. Angle at peak torque of flexion and extension in shoulder, hip and wrist is measured peak torque in same ratio of two groups.
5. Flexion of average power at 60deg/sec, 180deg/sec, 240deg/sec in shoulder is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05) comparing with control.
Flexion of average power at 240deg/sec in hip is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05) comparing with control. Flexion of average power at 60deg/sec, 180deg/sec in extension is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05) comparing with control.
6. Shoulder flexion of average power % body weight at 60deg/sec in female gymnast is highly significant(p<.05) comparing with control. Hip extension of average power % body weight at 180deg/sec, 240deg/sec in female gymnast is highly significant(p<.05)
comparing with control. Wrist of average power % body weight at 90deg/sec, 180deg/sec in female gymnasts is highly significant(p<.05) comparing with control.
7. Flexion of accel time at shoulder 60deg/sec, hip 180deg/sec, wrist 240deg/sec is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05) comparing with control. Shoulder of extension at 60deg/sec, 180deg/sec, 240deg/sec in female gymnasts is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05)
comparing with control.
8. Shoulder flexion of set total work at 60deg/sec, 180deg/sec is highly significant(p<.05) comparing with control. Flexion of set total work at hip 60deg/sec, wrist
90deg/sec is highly significant(p<.05) comparing wrist control. Shoulder extension of set total work at 60deg/sec is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05)
comparing with control. Wrist extension of set total work at 90deg/sec, 180deg/sec is highly significant(p<.01, p<.05) comparing with control.