공무원과 기업체직원의 부패 비교 : 부산광역시를 중심으로 = Comparison of corruption between the public officials and private enterprise staff : centering around Pusan city

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to give a solution to the problem of corruption with Korean public officials, a problem which is intensifying day by day. The study will investigate and empirically analyze the degree of corruption by Korean public officials and private enterprise staff, and compare both groups´ degree of corruption. Furthermore, the study seeks to clarify the reasons for the difference of corruption between both groups.
In order to fulfill the study´s objectives, the first procedure followed was to research the literature found in preceding studies regarding corruption. This was followed by empirically examining the questionnaire and doing statistical analyses of the results. The degree of corruption between officials and personal affairs was compared, and an attempt was made to explain the reasons for the difference in corruption between officials and personal affairs.
The literature study conceived corruption in a narrow sense and discussed the type of corruption and the method of corruption. To illustrate reasons for the difference in corruption between both groups, comparisons between the character of public and private organizations were made, and factors affecting corruption were discussed.
For the empirical analysis of corruption, the conception of variables which were used in this study were defined operationally, and the questionnaire was drawn up using studies used domestically and in foreign countries.
This questionnaire was sent out to the municipal office of Pusan and its affiliated administrative organization. For the private enterprise staff, it was taken by for big business enterprises and small to medium sized enterprises in Pusan area. The results of this investigation were statistically analysed by applying SPSSWIN. The statistical methods used were Frequency analysis, Reliability analysis, Crotabbs analysis, T-test, Mann-Whitney test, and Multiple-regressional analysis.
The results of the analyses are as follows:
ⅰ) The difference of corruption between officials and private enterprise staff is statistically significant, and the degree of corruption by private enterprise staff is far more severe than the degree of corruption by public officials.
ⅱ) All six influential variables which is selected in this study-Trust, Responsibility, Egoistic Inclination, Rigid inspection, Rigid punishment, Discretionary power-have statistically meaningful influences to corruption.
ⅲ) When corruption among these six variables is compared between public and private organization, statistically significant differences are found in Trust, Responsibility, Egoistic Inclination, Rigid inspection, Rigid punishment, Discretionary power.
Therefore, the difference of corruption between public and private organization is explained by four influential variables. In other words, the degree of corruption in the public organization is lower than that of the private organization, because the public organization has higher degree of Trust, Responsibility, Egoistic Inclination, Rigid inspection, Rigid punishment, Discretionary power than the private organization.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次
• Abstract = ⅵ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 = 3
• 제2장 부패연구의 기초이론 = 4
• 제1절 부패의 개념 = 4
• 1. Heidenheimer의 개념 분류 = 4
• 가. 직무중심의 정의 = 5
• 나. 시장중심의 정의 = 6
• 다. 공익중심의 정의 = 7
• 2. 국내학자들의 개념 정의 = 8
• 3. 본 연구에서의 개념 정의 = 9
• 제2절 부패의 유형 = 10
• 1. 정실형 부패 = 11
• 2. 공·사 무분별형 부패 = 12
• 3. 뇌물수수형 부패 = 12
• 제3절 부패연구의 접근방법 = 13
• 1. 개인적 접근법 = 14
• 2. 제도적 접근법 = 14
• 3. 체제적 접근법 = 15
• 제3장 공·사 조직의 특성 비교 = 17
• 1. 설립취지 및 목표의 성격 =17
• 2. 조직관리 = 18
• 3. 외부통제와 법규적용 = 18
• 4. 성과와 연계한 보상 = 19
• 5. 조직운영의 신축성 = 20
• 6. 구성원의 신분보장 = 20
• 제4장 부패의 영향요인 = 22
• 제1절 체제내적 요인 = 23
• 1. 신뢰 = 23
• 2. 책임성 = 24
• 3. 이기적 성향 = 25
• 4. 엄격한 감사 = 25
• 5. 엄격한 처벌 = 26
• 6. 재량권 = 27
• 제2절 체제외적 요인 = 27
• 1. 정치·경제적 요인 = 27
• 2. 사회·문화적 요인 = 28
• 제5장 공·사 조직간 부패 비교의 가설 = 30
• 1. 공무원의 부패가 더 심한 경우 = 31
• 2. 기업체직원의 부패가 더 심한 경우 = 32
• 3. 양 집단의 부패 차이가 없는 경우 = 33
• 제6장 실증분석 및 논의 = 35
• 제1절 조사설계 = 35
• 1. 변수의 조작적 정의 = 35
• 가. 부패 개념의 조작적 정의 = 36
• 나. 영향요인 변수의 조작적 정의 = 36
• 2. 자료의 수집 = 38
• 3. 척도구성 = 39
• 4. 자료분석 방법 = 42
• 제2절 분석결과 = 43
• 1. 표본자료의 특성 = 43
• 2. 변수의 신뢰도 검증 = 45
• 3. 공·사간 부패의 정도 비교 = 45
• 4. 근무처별 부패의 정도 비교 = 48
• 5. 부패에 대한 영향요인의 회귀분석 = 50
• 6. 독립변수의 공·사간 차이 비교 = 56
• 제3절 논의 : 공·사간 부패 차이의 원인 = 59
• 제7장 결론 = 66
• 참고문헌 = 68
• 부록 : 설문지 = 72