精神遲滯兒의 動的 집-家族畵를 통한 家族知覺硏究 = (A) Study on the Perception of Family through the Kinetic House-Family Drawing of the Mantally Retarded Children

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is noticed by the KHTP and KFD of Burns and it will be named K H-FD(Kinetic House Family Drawing) by drawing family in the place of man and tree in KHTP, and this paper aimed to know the perception about family for the mantally retarded children, and we analysed how it is represented concerning about the relation to the children, family and the house where they live in, by the way of increasing the dimension of house in KFD.
The house means not only the simple physical object, but also it represents the whole family and it is used as comprehensive meaning which includes the family structure and family relationship.
Thus, it will be a wider representation of the family circumstances rather than an expression of the family perception through the way of KFD, and by giving a medium named house, it gives a way of expression to the mantally retarded children for the problem of unsuitableness in the family.
Conseguently, this study is attributed to the research about the understanding how it is differenced concerning about the family perception, and the sex distinction of KFD, scholastic year and intelligence quotient.
The obct of this study is the 172 students( included male and female ), mentaly retarded children and who are in special school located in pusan, and main conclusions we obtained after the analysis about the frequency, the percentage and x^(2) a test of the K H-FD.
1. Concerning about relation of house and family, it is indicates no relationship to the transformation, and as for the use of the style in representatioa it indicates the proper sequence of elimination, envelopment two houses, seperation, big house, and small house, and the mar item is the tranformation which remarks 57.55％ and it is interpreted as the lack of small muscular activity, and the scantiness of the perception of form and the expression of the negative feeling about the house. Secondly, concerning about the house, as for the place of living, the item which indicates no relation to the children, remarks 41.27％. And concerning about the family (included himself, herself), it is interpreted negative in some measure.
2. The perception of family according to sex distinction, there was a difference in the figure of brother in nearing, and as for the obstacle and transformation, there were the differences between the figure of brother's and self-figure, and as for expression of non-specification and the representation of the same expression, there was a difference.
3. The family perception according to the intelligence quotient, as for nearing there was a difference between father's and brother's figure, and as for the size of figure and obstacles, there was a difference in father's figure and self figure, as for distinction, there was a difference between the brother's figure, concerning about elimination, of family number, there was a difference in father and mother's figure, and as for transformation, there was a difference in brother's and self figure, and as for withering, there was a difference in father's and self figure, there was difference between same-expression and non-specification.
4. The family perception according to the scholastic grade, there was a difference between obstacle, and concerning about size of picture, there was a difference in self figure, and as for transformation, there was a difference between father's and brother's figure. there was difference between non-specification.
Generally, there weae many of the simple expressions which have a low activities and dynamics in canvas. In contrasting of the father's and mother's figure, the negative indices; elimination and underlineing individual figure, and transformation, which is much higher in the case of father's and it is interpreted, the problem of psychological dishamony is much severe derived from father in the family and it is also interpreted it would be the cause of the anti-functional family.
In contrasting of brother's and self figure, the thing which represents the close contact in brother's and self figure compared wich mother's and father's figure, interpreted, the handicapped children have the affection and intimacy with there brother, and the thing there are many elimination are interpreted as the reflection of the hatred and it is also interpreted ambivalence of affection and aversion, as for the size of figure, it is represents the self-insistence in disregard in the family and it is also interpreted as the reflection of the self-image magnified and exaggerated in the side of the over-protection. Concerning about the brother's figure expression and self figure, it represented highly in the case of transformation and edging, it is interpreted as the reflection of the size of instability derived from the distortion and alienation in the family compared with his/her brother.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• A. 연구문제 = 3
• B. 연구의 제한 = 3
• C. 용어의 정의 = 4
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
• A. 정신지체아와 가족 = 5
• B. 정신지체아의 표현연구 = 6
• C. 아동에게서 집의 의미 = 10
• D. 동적가족화 = 16
• E. KFD의 해석적 관점 = 21
• Ⅲ. 방법 및 절차 = 24
• A. 연구 대상 = 24
• B. 연구도구 = 25
• C. 연구절차 = 26
• D. 분석기준 = 27
• E. 자료처리 = 29
• Ⅳ. 결과 및 해석 = 30
• A. 집과 가족그림 분석 = 30
• B. 동적가족화 분석 = 34
• C. 기타 = 44
• D. 문제지표수 분석 = 48
• E. 고찰 = 48
• Ⅴ. 결론 = 51
• 그림 = 53
• 참고문헌 = 62
• 부록 = 65
• Abstract = 66