인문계 고교생이 지각한 가족응집성 및 적응성과 진로의사결정과의 관계 연구 = (A) study of the relationship between family cohesion & adaptability as perceived by general high school student and career decision-making

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship between family cohesion & adaptability as perceived by general high school student and career decision-making.
The subjects were 538 students of general high school students residing in Seoul and Pucheon.
To assess the family cohesion and its adaptability, Olson, Portner & Lavee(1985)'s Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales Ⅲ(Faces Ⅲ) were employed. And to assess career decision-making, Assesment of Career Decision Making(ACDM) which was developed by Buck and Daniels(1986) and translated by Seo, Woo Seok were employed. The data was analyzed with Pearson correlation, mean, and one-way ANOVA.
The major findings were as follows :
First, The general high school students who perceived the higher family cobesion were more rational style but the students who perceived lower family cohesion were more dependent style.
Second, The general high school students who perceived the lower family adaptability were more dependent style but the students who perceived the higher family adaptability were more rational style.
The result from this study were discussed in connection with a career counseling, importance of family, and career education.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• I. 서론 = 1
• 1. 문제 제기 = 1
• 2. 연구목적 = 5
• II. 이론적 배경 = 6
• 1. 가족의 응집성과 적응성 = 6
• (1) 가족의 체계적 특성 = 6
• (2) 가족 응집성 = 7
• (3) 가족 적응성 = 10
• (4) 가족 응집성과 적응성에 대한 선행연구 = 11
• 2. 진로의사결정 = 14
• (1) 진로의사결정이론 = 14
• (2) 진로의사결정유형 = 25
• (3) 진로의사결정 수준 = 28
• (4) 진로의사결정유형과 수준에 대한 선행연구 = 30
• 3. 가족 응집성 및 적응성과 진로의사결정과의 관계 = 35
• 4. 연구 가설 = 38
• III. 연구 방법 = 40
• 1. 연구 대상 = 40
• 2. 측정 도구 = 42
• (1) 가족의 응집성 및 적응성 = 42
• (2) 진로의사결정 = 44
• 3. 자료 처리 = 47
• IV. 연구 결과 및 논의 = 48
• 1. 연구 결과 = 48
• (1) 연구 대상자의 일반적 특징 = 48
• (2) 가족응집성 및 적응성에 따른 진로의사결정 유형 = 52
• (3) 가족응집성 및 적응성에 따른 진로의사결정 유형 및 수준의 일원변량분석 = 55
• 2. 논의 = 58
• V. 요약 및 결론 = 62
• 1. 요약 = 62
• 2. 결론 = 68
• 부록
• 참고문헌
• 영문초록