국어 파생 사동사의 통시적 연구 = (A) Diachronic Study on the Derived Causative Verbs in Korean

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis is a diachronic study on the derived causative verbs in Korean. Namely, it is a study on a synchronic derivation rule of causative verb form the 15th to 20th century Korean by each century, and on the change of derivation rule of causative verb, and on the historical change of derived causative verbs.
These are the summary of the results.
[1] The derived causative verbs have to be morphologically a combined form of causative suffix '-이-, -히-, -리-, -기-, -오/우-, -호/후(추)-, -고/구-' on a root of declinable word. And syntactically, have to keep the case form, and semantically, can't be separated from the main verb or main causative verb.
[2] We have seen that causative suffix that derive the causative verb, appears to be various kinds of allomorph according to the final phoneme of root. And we have clarified the combined condition of derived causative verbs in each century, on which condition these allomorph got chosen.
[3] We made a rule on each century's derivation from causative verbs in the grounding of it's condition by each century. And We looked into these rules of derivation from the causative verbs have changed diachronically.
First, set up the basic allomorph of causative suffix occured as '- 이 -, -히-, -리-, -기-, -오/우-, -호/후(추)-, -고/구-' to be '-이-', and regularized on what rules each allomorph causative suffix having been guided in here.
We divided the type of these rules that have changed historically to the changed types and unchanged types on a large scale and explained the reason on the view of 'firming up of a causative expression' and 'the pursuit of stability in morph'.
We expected the type that causative expression nile hadn't changed is stable morphologically, and doesn't need other elements to firm up the causative expression, so these type is used continually.
The most characteristic of the changed type is that'-이-' or '-오/우-', especially '-이-' have replaced to '-히-' or '-리-'. That is, to disperse the functional load that causative suffix has to other causative suffix like'-히-' or '-리-' There were lots of causative verbs combined with causative suffix '-리-' that could be said almost absolute, in the 15th century Korean. But in the 20th century Korean, we have made confirmation that the main verb and ' ㅂ -irregular declinable word' which have /ㄺ/ as a final phoneme of root had come to combine the causative suffix. '히-' and 'ㄷ-irregular declinable word' and the declinable word which has final phoneme of root /ㄹ/ or /ㅀ/ had changed the combination of causative suffix to'-리-'.
We have made an explanation on the reason to have changed in this form, on the point of view that 'firming up of a causative expression'. That is, on the purpose to get causative expression to be recognize move powerfully by firming up the acoustique impression, the change in aspirate or change to the combination of /ㄹㄹ/ form by /ㄹ/ sound addition are notable especially.
(4) Until now, we presented change form of each causative verbs in each century for the subject of study in a divided form of 'first, causative verbs which don't have changes in the morph, second, causative verbs which have changes in the morph (one which have change in only morph of final phoneme of root, or causative suffix, and the one which change in both final phoneme of root and causative suffix), third, causative verbs that has lost its quality (lexicalized, change in a syntacical way, extinction of main verbs), fourth, type of the generated causative verbs'.
And we explained the change of derivation rule. Name, type that the combination isn't regular morphologically is trying to change into regular combination form, and it is called as 'the pursuit of stability in morph'. We have seen that if the attempt like this failure In derivation rule because of other elements like collision homonymique of passive verb or other transitive verb, they make change in different method that is syntactical method.
Also we have seen that the changes in derivation rule of causative verb are mainly in the purpose of strengthening the causative expression and even through they can't follow these changes there are cases that the causative verbs change or vanish in different way.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 1. 머리말 = 1
• 1.1. 연구 목적 = 1
• 1.2. 앞선 연구 = 5
• 1.3. 연구 방법 = 11
• 1.4. 연구 대상 = 14
• 2. 사동법과 파생 사동사 = 15
• 2.0. 개관 = 15
• 2.1. 사동과 파생 사동사 = 15
• 2.1.1. 사동의 개념 = 15
• 2.1.2. 사동사와 피동사의 관계 = 17
• 2.1.3. 사동문의 행위자 자질 = 19
• 2.2. 사동법의 실현 방법 = 22
• 2.2.1. 어휘적 사동법 = 23
• 2.2.2. 형태적 사동법 = 24
• 2.2.3. 통사적 사동법 = 27
• 2.2.4. 복합 사동법 = 27
• 2.3. 파생 사동사의 범주 = 28
• 2.3.1. 형태적 기준 = 29
• 2.3.2. 통사적 기준 = 30
• 2.3.3. 의미적 기준 = 33
• 2.4. 정리 = 40
• 3. 사동사 파생법 = 41
• 3.0. 개관 = 41
• 3.1. 15세기국어의 사동사 파생 = 45
• 3.1.1. 15세기국어의 사동사 목륵 = 45
• 3.1.2. 15세기국어의 사동사 파생접미사의 선택 조건 = 51
• 3.1.3. 15세기국어의 사동사 파생법 = 74
• 3.2. 16세기국어의 사동사 파생 = 79
• 3.2.1. 16세기국어의 사동사 목록 = 79
• 3.2.2. 16세기국어의 사동사 파생접미사의 선택 조건 = 84
• 3.2.3. 16세기국어의 사동사 파생법 = 96
• 3.3. 17세기국어의 사동사 파생 = 99
• 3.3.1. 17세기국어의 사동사 목록 = 99
• 3.3.2. 17세기국어의 사동사 파생접미사의 선택 조건 = 104
• 3.3.3. 17세기국어의 사동사 파생법 = 118
• 3.4. 18세기국어의 사동사 파생 = 121
• 3.4.1. 18세기국어의 사동사 목록 = 121
• 3.4.2. 18세기국어의 사동사 파생접미사의 선택 조건 = 126
• 3.4.3. 18세기국어의 사동사 파생법 = 138
• 3.5. 19세기국어의 사동사 파생 = 141
• 3.5.1. 19세기국어의 사동사 목록 = 141
• 3.5.2. 19세기국어의 사동사 파생접미사의 선택 조건 = 145
• 3.5.3. 19세기국어의 사동사 파생법 = 154
• 3.6. 20세기국어의 사동사 파생 = 156
• 3.6.1. 20세기국어의 사동사 목록 = 156
• 3.6.2. 20세기국어의 사동사 파생접미사의 선택 조건 = 161
• 3.6.3. 20세기국어의 사동사 파생법 = 177
• 3.7. 정리 = 180
• 4. 사동사 파생법의 변천과 파생 사동사의 변화 = 181
• 4.0. 개관 = 181
• 4.1. 사동사 파생법의 변천 = 181
• 4.1.1. 사동사 파생법이 바뀌지 않은 유형 = 183
• 4.1.2. 사동사 파생법이 바뀐 유형 = 193
• 4.2. 파생 사동사의 변화 = 201
• 4.2.1. 형태가 변하지 않은 사동사 = 201
• 4.2.2. 형태가 변한 사동사 = 208
• 4.2.2.1. 어근말음의 형태만 변한 사동사 = 208
• 4.2.2.2. 사동접미사의 형태만 변한 사동사 = 212
• 4.2.2.3. 어근말음과 사동접미사의 형태가 변한 사동사 = 220
• 4.2.3. 사동사의 자격을 상실한 사동사 = 223
• 4.2.3.1. 어휘화 = 223
• 4.2.3.2. 통사적 방법으로 변화 = 226
• 4.2.3.3. 본동사의 소멸 = 233
• 4.2.4. 생성된 사동사 = 235
• 4.3. 정리 = 237
• 5. 맺음말 = 239
• 5.1. 요약 = 239
• 5.2. 연구의 의의와 과제 = 242
• ＜참고문헌＞ = 244
• SUMMARY = 251
• 부록1 문헌 자료 목록 = 254
• 부록2 국어의 파생 사동사 목록 = 258