RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      自問自答 訓練이 아동의 학업 성취에 미치는 효과

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T2762368

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        청원군: 韓國敎員大學校, 1996

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        1996

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        375.204 판사항(3)

      • 발행국(도시)

        충청북도

      • 형태사항

        v,69장: 삽도; 27cm

      • 일반주기명

        권말부록으로 "自問自答 訓練 프로그램 : 질문 만들고 답하기" 수록
        참고문헌 : 36-38장

      • 소장기관
        • 강원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 경상국립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 경성대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 공주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 국립군산대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 국립순천대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 국립창원대학교 도서관 (창원캠퍼스) 소장기관정보
        • 대구교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 서울교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 서울시립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 전주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 제주대학교 교육대학도서관 소장기관정보
        • 청주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 춘천교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국교원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국학중앙연구원 한국학도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the self-generated question and answer training on children's academic achievement. For this purpose, the research questions were established as follows : First, Was there a significant difference between the experimental group engaged in the self-generated question and answer training and the control group not participated in the self-generated question and answer training? Second, Was there a significant difference between low and high academic achieved children in experimental group?
      Centering around the above study probrems and based on the preceding studies and relevant theories, the following hypotheses were established. First, It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in academic achievement between experimental group engaged in the self-generated question and answer training and control group not participated in the self-generated question and answer training. Second, It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in academic achievement between low and high academic achieved children in experimental group.
      For this study, 84 5th grade children, enrolled in a public elementary school in Seoul, were sampled. They were divided into two groups, experimental and control group. Experimental group was trained in the self-generated question and answer training program designed by researcher for 7 weeks, 4 times per week.
      Hypothesis 1 and 2 were verified by t - Test. The results of this study were summarized as follows: First, there was a significant difference at the .05 level in academic achievement between experimental and control groups. Therefore, hypothesis 1 was accepted. Second, there was a significant difference at the .001 level in academic achievement between low and high academic achieved children in experimental group. Therefore, hypothesis 2 was accepted. These findings indicated that the self-generated question and answer training is effective to improve children's academic achievement and is more effective low achievers than high achievers.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the self-generated question and answer training on children's academic achievement. For this purpose, the research questions were established as follows : First, Was there a significant differenc...

      The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the self-generated question and answer training on children's academic achievement. For this purpose, the research questions were established as follows : First, Was there a significant difference between the experimental group engaged in the self-generated question and answer training and the control group not participated in the self-generated question and answer training? Second, Was there a significant difference between low and high academic achieved children in experimental group?
      Centering around the above study probrems and based on the preceding studies and relevant theories, the following hypotheses were established. First, It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in academic achievement between experimental group engaged in the self-generated question and answer training and control group not participated in the self-generated question and answer training. Second, It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in academic achievement between low and high academic achieved children in experimental group.
      For this study, 84 5th grade children, enrolled in a public elementary school in Seoul, were sampled. They were divided into two groups, experimental and control group. Experimental group was trained in the self-generated question and answer training program designed by researcher for 7 weeks, 4 times per week.
      Hypothesis 1 and 2 were verified by t - Test. The results of this study were summarized as follows: First, there was a significant difference at the .05 level in academic achievement between experimental and control groups. Therefore, hypothesis 1 was accepted. Second, there was a significant difference at the .001 level in academic achievement between low and high academic achieved children in experimental group. Therefore, hypothesis 2 was accepted. These findings indicated that the self-generated question and answer training is effective to improve children's academic achievement and is more effective low achievers than high achievers.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • A. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • B. 연구 문제 = 2
      • C. 용어의 정의 = 3
      • D. 연구의 가설 = 3
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • A. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • B. 연구 문제 = 2
      • C. 용어의 정의 = 3
      • D. 연구의 가설 = 3
      • E. 연구의 제한점 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • A. 질문의 기능, 질문분류체계 및 질문에 관한 선행 연구의 고찰 = 5
      • B. 자문자답 훈련의 기저 = 11
      • C. 자문자답에 과한 선행 연구의 고찰 = 16
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 방법 = 20
      • A. 연구 대상 = 20
      • B. 실험 설계 = 21
      • C. 실험 도구 = 21
      • D. 실험 처치 = 23
      • E. 자료 처리 = 26
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 = 27
      • A. 연구 결과 = 27
      • B. 논의 = 30
      • Ⅴ. 결론 = 32
      • A. 요약 = 32
      • B. 결론 = 34
      • 참고문헌 = 36
      • ABSTRACT = 39
      • 부록 〈自問自答 訓練 프로그램〉 질문 만들고 답하기 = 41
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼