RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    學業成就水準에 따른 自我槪念과 學習樣式의 相關硏究

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T2481973

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      전주 : 全北大學校, 1988

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 전북대학교 교육대학원 , 교육방법전공 , 1988

    • 발행연도

      1988

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      370.18 판사항(3)

    • 발행국(도시)

      전북특별자치도

    • 형태사항

      53 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm.

    • 소장기관
      • 경남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 경상국립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 단국대학교 퇴계기념도서관(중앙도서관) 소장기관정보
      • 대림대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전주대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 호남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is aimed to examine the difference of the connection between self-concept and learning style and the level of learning achievement. In order to settle this study, the following hypothesises are formed by the the grond Dunn and Duun's patterns of learning style.
    <Hypothesis I> Self-concept will have a significant difference according to the level of learning achievement.
    <Hypothesis II> Learning style will have a significant difference according to the learning achievement.
    <Hypothesis III> Between self-concept and learning style will have a significant correlation.
    In order to test the above hypothesises, self-concept Inventory and Learning style Inventory were tested by the 112 girls an boys students of high schools in Iri, who were divided into two groups, up and down.
    In order to test <Hypothesis I>, two-way analysis of variable was tested, independent variable of up and down classes in school record and attatched variables down class in self-concept.
    As the result, all variables, except sell-identity have turned out to have some differences in accordance with the level of school record, but not in the sexes and the mutual effects between school record and sexes.
    In order to test <Hypothesis II> for the correlation between the school record and the four fields of learning style, the significant correlation was revealed in the environmental, calm and social stimulations as the result of pearson's product-moment Correlation coeffience. And to findout the differences of the low variable of each field by the school record, two-way analysis of variable, independent variable of up and down classes in school record and sexes and attatched variable of down class in learning style was tested.
    As the result of the test, the differences of the sexes turned out to be different in the visual preferrence, morning, evening, and transferability as an adult and the difference of school record in thermometer, design, motivation, durability, structurism, auditory sensation and tranferability.
    In order to test <Hypothesis III>, canonical correlation between the outer self standardization and the inner self standardization and low variable of learning style was done. As the result of the test, the moral ethical self of outer self standardization and personal self showed that the duration of learning style has someting to do with the calm correlation and low variable wanting to study with classmates. According to the result of the test, self satisfaction score and self behavior score showed that the structurizing of the learning style and low variable to want to study with classmates have something to do with calm correlation.
    As the results of the above tests, the self-concept and the charateristics of learning style of up and down classes can be roughly known by finding out the variable according to the level of learning achievements. In addition to these tests after the differnce of these fields was considered, the characteristics of each class must be searched, the suitable teaching method must be projected and succeeding study must be continued.
    번역하기

    This study is aimed to examine the difference of the connection between self-concept and learning style and the level of learning achievement. In order to settle this study, the following hypothesises are formed by the the grond Dunn and Duun's patter...

    This study is aimed to examine the difference of the connection between self-concept and learning style and the level of learning achievement. In order to settle this study, the following hypothesises are formed by the the grond Dunn and Duun's patterns of learning style.
    <Hypothesis I> Self-concept will have a significant difference according to the level of learning achievement.
    <Hypothesis II> Learning style will have a significant difference according to the learning achievement.
    <Hypothesis III> Between self-concept and learning style will have a significant correlation.
    In order to test the above hypothesises, self-concept Inventory and Learning style Inventory were tested by the 112 girls an boys students of high schools in Iri, who were divided into two groups, up and down.
    In order to test <Hypothesis I>, two-way analysis of variable was tested, independent variable of up and down classes in school record and attatched variables down class in self-concept.
    As the result, all variables, except sell-identity have turned out to have some differences in accordance with the level of school record, but not in the sexes and the mutual effects between school record and sexes.
    In order to test <Hypothesis II> for the correlation between the school record and the four fields of learning style, the significant correlation was revealed in the environmental, calm and social stimulations as the result of pearson's product-moment Correlation coeffience. And to findout the differences of the low variable of each field by the school record, two-way analysis of variable, independent variable of up and down classes in school record and sexes and attatched variable of down class in learning style was tested.
    As the result of the test, the differences of the sexes turned out to be different in the visual preferrence, morning, evening, and transferability as an adult and the difference of school record in thermometer, design, motivation, durability, structurism, auditory sensation and tranferability.
    In order to test <Hypothesis III>, canonical correlation between the outer self standardization and the inner self standardization and low variable of learning style was done. As the result of the test, the moral ethical self of outer self standardization and personal self showed that the duration of learning style has someting to do with the calm correlation and low variable wanting to study with classmates. According to the result of the test, self satisfaction score and self behavior score showed that the structurizing of the learning style and low variable to want to study with classmates have something to do with calm correlation.
    As the results of the above tests, the self-concept and the charateristics of learning style of up and down classes can be roughly known by finding out the variable according to the level of learning achievements. In addition to these tests after the differnce of these fields was considered, the characteristics of each class must be searched, the suitable teaching method must be projected and succeeding study must be continued.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • ·英文抄錄 = 4
    • I. 緖論 = 7
    • 1. 硏究의 必要性 = 7
    • 2. 硏究의 目的 = 9
    • 목차
    • ·英文抄錄 = 4
    • I. 緖論 = 7
    • 1. 硏究의 必要性 = 7
    • 2. 硏究의 目的 = 9
    • II. 理論的 背景 = 10
    • 1. 學習樣式 = 10
    • 가. 學習樣式의 槪念 = 10
    • 나. 學習樣式의 構成要因 = 12
    • 다. 學習樣式과 學習成就度와의 關係 = 15
    • 2. 自我槪念 = 17
    • 가. 自我와 自我開念 = 17
    • 나. 自我槪念의 特性 = 18
    • 다. 自我槪念과 學業成就 = 20
    • III. 硏究 方法 = 22
    • 1. 硏究 假說 = 22
    • 2. 硏究 對象 = 22
    • 3. 道具 = 22
    • 4. 統計 處理 = 24
    • IV. 結果解析 및 論議 = 26
    • 1. 成績과 自我槪念의 關係 = 26
    • 2. 成績과 學習樣式의 關係 = 29
    • 3. 自我槪念과 學習樣式의 關係 = 38
    • V. 要約 및 結論 = 43
    • 1. 要約 = 43
    • 2. 結論 = 43
    • 3. 提言 = 44
    • ·參考文獻 = 45
    • ·附錄 = 49
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼