正常集團과 不適應集團間의 合理的 信念의 差異 = (The) difference of rational belief between normal group and maladjustment group

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

PROBLEM
The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences of the way of thinking and the beliefs between normal students and maladjusted students.
According to Ellis' theory, the human maladaptive behaviors are caused by irrational beliefs. The hypothesis of the study is that the maladjustment students have more irrational beliefs than normal students.
METHOD
The subject in this study were 77 normal and 56 malajusted students.
They were selected from 330 boys and 290 girls of middle school in Kong ju through The Short Form MMPI.
To these two groups, Personal Beliefs Inventroy revised from Par's Questionnaire was administered, Which was developed from following tests-Personal Inventroy by Hartman, Rational Scale by Ellis, Adult Irrational Idea Inventory by Fox and Davies, Self Inventory by Pluchick and Test of Irrational Idea by Laughridge.
Personal Beliefs Inventory is consisted of 99 items, nine items for each belief respectively.
RESULTS
According to th results of testing it can be said that the differnce between the total scores of maladaptive group and of normal group is significant at 1 per cent level.
In subscale 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9, the difference is between two groups is significant at 1 per cent level, In subscale 3 at 5 per cent level, and in subscale 10, 11 non - significant.
It was proved that maladaptive group has a more II logical, irrational tendency than normal group.
CONCLUSION
On the grounds of the results, the conclusions can be made as following:
1. The maldjustment students has more irrational beliefs than normal group. In concreteness, maladjustment students has a greater expectation for affection and recognition from others considers the punishment of deliqencies more sincerely than normal students. And the characteristics of maladjustment, depdency on others, pasr-deterministic way of thought, external and evasive tendency for the bad things.
2. Maladjusted students show more maladaptive behavior by keeping such irrational beliefs than students in normal students.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 緖論 = 1
• II. 理論的 背景 = 6
• A. Ellis의 RET 理論 = 6
• 1. RET의 槪要 = 6
• 2. RET의 主要 命制 = 8
• 3. RET의 性格 理論 = 10
• 4. RET의 他 理論과의 比較 = 16
• 5. RET의 技法 = 19
• B. 不適應 行動 = 22
• 1. 異常性格의 定義 = 22
• 2. 異常的性格의 柳型 = 24
• C. 不的應 行動과 信念의 特徵 = 27
• 1. 信念과 行動과의 關界 = 27
• 2. 非合理的 信念과 不籍應 行動 = 29
• III. 假設 = 32
• IV. 硏究의 方法 = 33
• A. 硏究對象 = 33
• B. 側定導具 = 33
• C. 檢査實時 = 37
• D. 資料處理 = 38
• V. 結果 = 39
• VI. 論議 = 43
• 參考文獻 = 46
• 附錄 = 49
• 英問抄錄 = 58