RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      인지양식·정의적 특성과 학업 성취도와의 관계

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T2169227

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울: 숙명여자대학교, 1989

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        1989

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        370.18

      • DDC

        370.15 판사항(19)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 형태사항

        v,110,18장; 26cm

      • 소장기관
        • 강원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 경남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 경상국립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 숙명여자대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 용인대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 청주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 초당대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국교원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역


      I Purpose
      The purpose of this study is
      1. The purpose of this study was to clear the difference between learner's cognitive style and academic records in school.
      2. The second purpose of this study was to find out the difference between field independent-field dependent style and IQ.
      3. The third purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between field independent-field dependent and academic self concept and interest.
      4. The fourth purpose of this study was to define the effect of Cognitive style and IQ as cognitive characteristics of academy self concept and academy interest as emotional characteristics on academy records about each subject and total subjects.
      II. Hypothess
      In order to research the aforementioned assumptions, the following hypotheses were established:
      1. There will be difference in academic achievements field independent-field dependent style.
      2. There will be difference in intelligence according to field independent-field dependent style.
      3. There will be difference in emotional characteristic according to field independent-field dependent style.
      3-1 There will be difference of academic self concept according to field independent-field dependent style.
      3-2 There will be difference in academic interest on each subject and total subjcts according to field independent-field dependent style
      4. There will be difference in influence of Cognitive and Emotional Characteristics.
      III. Methods
      1. Sample: For the subjects of this study, 4 schools(N=494) were selected from the second and third grade students of two middle schools in Seoul city, and 248 students of then were male and 246 students were female.
      2. Tools: a) Field-Dependent Field-Independent Test: Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles were measured with the standardized 'Group Embedded Figures Test A-I' Which is constructed by Joun Yoon Sik and Chang Hyuk Pho (1980).
      b) Emotional Characteristics Test: Emotional characteristics test is made by researcher based on academic self concept test of park hun sik and Jin Wi Gyo et.
      c) School Academic Achievements Test: The academic achievements of Students based on the evaluationed records of 1988 year
      d) IQ Test: IQ data used data which was carried by school
      3. Statistic Methods: All of the data were verified by the statistical of students analysis such as t-test, Pearson t, multiple r, partial r.
      IV. Conclusion
      Major findings were as follows:
      There were significant relationships between field independent-field dependent style and IQ
      There were partially significant relationships between field independent-field dependent and academic self concept
      There were partially significant relationships between field independent-field dependent and academic interest, too.
      Effect of Cognitive style and IQ as cognitive characteristics and Academic Self Concept and Interest on School academy achievement is different.

      번역하기

      I Purpose The purpose of this study is 1. The purpose of this study was to clear the difference between learner's cognitive style and academic records in school. 2. The second purpose of this study was to find out the difference between field ind...


      I Purpose
      The purpose of this study is
      1. The purpose of this study was to clear the difference between learner's cognitive style and academic records in school.
      2. The second purpose of this study was to find out the difference between field independent-field dependent style and IQ.
      3. The third purpose of this study was to investigate the difference between field independent-field dependent and academic self concept and interest.
      4. The fourth purpose of this study was to define the effect of Cognitive style and IQ as cognitive characteristics of academy self concept and academy interest as emotional characteristics on academy records about each subject and total subjects.
      II. Hypothess
      In order to research the aforementioned assumptions, the following hypotheses were established:
      1. There will be difference in academic achievements field independent-field dependent style.
      2. There will be difference in intelligence according to field independent-field dependent style.
      3. There will be difference in emotional characteristic according to field independent-field dependent style.
      3-1 There will be difference of academic self concept according to field independent-field dependent style.
      3-2 There will be difference in academic interest on each subject and total subjcts according to field independent-field dependent style
      4. There will be difference in influence of Cognitive and Emotional Characteristics.
      III. Methods
      1. Sample: For the subjects of this study, 4 schools(N=494) were selected from the second and third grade students of two middle schools in Seoul city, and 248 students of then were male and 246 students were female.
      2. Tools: a) Field-Dependent Field-Independent Test: Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles were measured with the standardized 'Group Embedded Figures Test A-I' Which is constructed by Joun Yoon Sik and Chang Hyuk Pho (1980).
      b) Emotional Characteristics Test: Emotional characteristics test is made by researcher based on academic self concept test of park hun sik and Jin Wi Gyo et.
      c) School Academic Achievements Test: The academic achievements of Students based on the evaluationed records of 1988 year
      d) IQ Test: IQ data used data which was carried by school
      3. Statistic Methods: All of the data were verified by the statistical of students analysis such as t-test, Pearson t, multiple r, partial r.
      IV. Conclusion
      Major findings were as follows:
      There were significant relationships between field independent-field dependent style and IQ
      There were partially significant relationships between field independent-field dependent and academic self concept
      There were partially significant relationships between field independent-field dependent and academic interest, too.
      Effect of Cognitive style and IQ as cognitive characteristics and Academic Self Concept and Interest on School academy achievement is different.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • II. 이론적 배경 = 4
      • A. 인지양식 = 4
      • 1. 인지양식 이론 = 4
      • 목차
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • II. 이론적 배경 = 4
      • A. 인지양식 = 4
      • 1. 인지양식 이론 = 4
      • 2. 장독립 - 장의존 인지양식 = 13
      • B. 정의적 특성 = 27
      • 1. 정의적 특성 이론 = 27
      • 2. 학업적 자아개념 = 35
      • 3. 학업 흥미 = 42
      • C. 인지양식·정의적 특성과 학업성취도와의 관계 = 49
      • 1. 인지양식·정의적 특성 = 49
      • 2. 인지양식·정의적 특성과 학업성취도 = 51
      • D. 연구 가설 = 55
      • III. 연구 방법 및 절차 = 56
      • A. 연구 대상 = 56
      • B. 검사 도구 = 56
      • C. 연구 절차 = 62
      • D. 자료 처리 = 63
      • E. 연구의 제한점 = 63
      • IV. 연구 결과 = 64
      • V. 논의 = 87
      • VI. 요약 및 결론 = 96
      • A. 요약 = 96
      • B. 결론 = 101
      • * 참고문헌 = 104
      • * 부록 = 1
      • * 영문초록 = 16
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼