RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      아동의 인지양식과 귀인성향이 학업성취에 미치는 영향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T2161126

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울: 숙명여자대학교, 1995

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        1995

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        370.18

      • DDC

        370.15 판사항(19)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 형태사항

        v,80장: 삽도; 26cm

      • 소장기관
        • 강원대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 대구가톨릭대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 선문대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 숙명여자대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 전남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
        • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한국학중앙연구원 한국학도서관 소장기관정보
        • 한남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purposes of the present study are (1) to find out the relationship between cognitive style and academic achievement. (2) to find out the relationship between locus of control and academic achievement. (3) to find out the relationship between cognitive style and locus of control (4) to find out the relationship among cognitive style, locus of control and academic achievement.
      The research hypotheses were stated as follows :
      [Hypothesis 1] In academic achievement, there will be difference according to cognitive style,
      1-a> There will be a difference in academic achievement of each subject and of all subjets according to field-independent, field-dependent style.
      [Hypothesis 2] In academic achievement, there will be a difference according to locus of control.
      2-a> There will be a difference in academic achievement according to Internality, Powerful others.
      2-b> There will be a difference in accademic achievement according to Internality-Chance.
      2-c> There will be difference in academic achievement according to Powerful others-Chance.
      [Hypothesis 3] In locus of Control, there will be a difference according to cognitive style.
      3-a> The field-independent cognitive style group will be higher Internality than the field-dependent cognitive style group.
      3-b> The field-dependent cognitive style group will be higher exernality than the field-independent cognitive style group.
      [Hypothesis 4] In academic achievement, there will be a difference according to cognitive style and to locus of control.
      4-a> The field independent-internality group will show highest academic achievement.
      In order to test the hypotheses, the subjects participated in the present study were 266 sixth grade students at a primary school in Seoul.
      The instruments used for this study were Group Embedded Figure Test(G.E.F.T) and the Locus of Control Scale by Levenson consists of three subscales which are Internality, Powerful others and Chance.
      Statistics method applied for this study are T-test, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, χ²and Tukey's HSD.
      Major findings were summarized as follows:
      Hypothesis 1 was confirmed.
      1-a> In academic achievement, field-independent group shows higher score than field-dependent group.
      Hypothesis 2 was partly confirmed
      2-a> In academic achievement, internality shows higher score than powerful others.
      2-b> In academic achievement, internality shows higher score than chance.
      2-c> In academic achievement, there is no difference between powerful others and chance. Hypothesis 3 was confirmed.
      3-a> The field-independent group shows higher degree of internality than the field-dependent group.
      3-b> The field-dependent group shows higher degree of externality(powerful others & chance) than the field-independent group.
      Hypothesis 4 was confirmed.
      4-a> The field independent-internality group shows the highest score of academic achievement than other groups.
      번역하기

      The purposes of the present study are (1) to find out the relationship between cognitive style and academic achievement. (2) to find out the relationship between locus of control and academic achievement. (3) to find out the relationship between cogni...

      The purposes of the present study are (1) to find out the relationship between cognitive style and academic achievement. (2) to find out the relationship between locus of control and academic achievement. (3) to find out the relationship between cognitive style and locus of control (4) to find out the relationship among cognitive style, locus of control and academic achievement.
      The research hypotheses were stated as follows :
      [Hypothesis 1] In academic achievement, there will be difference according to cognitive style,
      1-a> There will be a difference in academic achievement of each subject and of all subjets according to field-independent, field-dependent style.
      [Hypothesis 2] In academic achievement, there will be a difference according to locus of control.
      2-a> There will be a difference in academic achievement according to Internality, Powerful others.
      2-b> There will be a difference in accademic achievement according to Internality-Chance.
      2-c> There will be difference in academic achievement according to Powerful others-Chance.
      [Hypothesis 3] In locus of Control, there will be a difference according to cognitive style.
      3-a> The field-independent cognitive style group will be higher Internality than the field-dependent cognitive style group.
      3-b> The field-dependent cognitive style group will be higher exernality than the field-independent cognitive style group.
      [Hypothesis 4] In academic achievement, there will be a difference according to cognitive style and to locus of control.
      4-a> The field independent-internality group will show highest academic achievement.
      In order to test the hypotheses, the subjects participated in the present study were 266 sixth grade students at a primary school in Seoul.
      The instruments used for this study were Group Embedded Figure Test(G.E.F.T) and the Locus of Control Scale by Levenson consists of three subscales which are Internality, Powerful others and Chance.
      Statistics method applied for this study are T-test, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, χ²and Tukey's HSD.
      Major findings were summarized as follows:
      Hypothesis 1 was confirmed.
      1-a> In academic achievement, field-independent group shows higher score than field-dependent group.
      Hypothesis 2 was partly confirmed
      2-a> In academic achievement, internality shows higher score than powerful others.
      2-b> In academic achievement, internality shows higher score than chance.
      2-c> In academic achievement, there is no difference between powerful others and chance. Hypothesis 3 was confirmed.
      3-a> The field-independent group shows higher degree of internality than the field-dependent group.
      3-b> The field-dependent group shows higher degree of externality(powerful others & chance) than the field-independent group.
      Hypothesis 4 was confirmed.
      4-a> The field independent-internality group shows the highest score of academic achievement than other groups.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제제기 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 4
      • II. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • 1. 인지양식 = 5
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 문제제기 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 4
      • II. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • 1. 인지양식 = 5
      • 2. 귀인성향 = 18
      • 3. 인지양식과 귀인성향 = 31
      • 4. 연구의 개념 모형 = 33
      • 5. 연구가설 = 34
      • III. 연구방법 = 37
      • 1. 연구대상 = 37
      • 2. 측정도구 = 38
      • 3. 통계방법 = 41
      • IV. 결과 및 해석 = 42
      • 1. 일반적 결과 = 42
      • 2. 가설검증 = 44
      • V. 연구의 통합 = 53
      • VI. 요약 및 결론 = 57
      • 1. 연구의 요약 = 57
      • 2. 결론 = 60
      • 참고 문헌 = 63
      • 영문 초록 = 67
      • 부록 = 71
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼