跆拳道 審判判定에 對한 調査硏究 = (A) Study on the Judgement for Taekwondo Competition

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The objective of this study is to provide a stepping-stone for the development of TAEKWONDO competition by improving the judge talents, regulation of scoring, and competition rules.
The athletes who are well acquainted with TAEKWONDO were inquired of the factors influencing the decision of judges. The results obtained in this study were summarized as follows;
1. Most athletes had a fixed purpose as well as a positive attitude.
2. Decisions made by the Refereeing Officials showed no fairness to the athletes because it was believed that Jury may be involved in a dishonest act.
3. As a rule, the contestants were satisfied with the decision of judges. But there was room for improvement in the competition rules and regulations.
Athletes had a preference for 5-Judge System rather than 3-Judge system.
4. The new scientific method of decision, which uses the mean of scores excluded the maximum and minimum scores, is necessary for the fair decision of Refereeing officials.
In conclusion, we must eliminate a false show of power to make TAEKWONDO the national health sports and then it will lead the improvement of TAEKWONDO more successfully.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• Ⅰ. 序論 = 1
• 1. 硏究의 必要性 = 1
• 2. 硏究의 目的 = 2
• 3. 硏究의 制限點 = 3
• Ⅱ. 理論的 背景 = 4
• 1. 跆拳道의 歷史 = 4
• 1) 原始時代 및 部族時代 跆拳道 胎動背景 = 4
• 가) 原始時代 = 4
• 나) 部族時代 = 4
• 2) 三國時代 = 5
• 가) 高句麗時代 = 6
• 나) 百濟時代 = 7
• 다) 新羅時代 = 7
• Ⅲ. 硏究方法 = 8
• 1. 硏究節次 및 日程 = 8
• 2. 調査對象 = 8
• 3. 說問紙 作成方法 = 9
• 4. 說問紙 配付 및 回收 = 9
• 5. 資料 處理 = 9
• Ⅳ. 硏究結果 및 解析 = 10
• 1. 태권도 수련경력과 수련하게된 동기 = 10
• 2. 審判員 構成과 권한 = 11
• 3. 심판원의 자질문제 = 14
• 4. 競技規則과 審判判定 = 17
• Ⅴ. 結論 = 22
• 附錄 設問紙 = 25
• 參考文獻 = 30
• ABSTRACT = 32