Background: Sasang Constitutional Medicine (SCM), originating in Korea, categorizes individuals into four types based on physiological imbalances. Recent studies integrate AI like Random Forest to condense these questionnaires, simplifying diagnosis w...
Background: Sasang Constitutional Medicine (SCM), originating in Korea, categorizes individuals into four types based on physiological imbalances. Recent studies integrate AI like Random Forest to condense these questionnaires, simplifying diagnosis while maintaining accuracy, enhancing the potential of SCM for personalized medicine and preventive care.
Aim: The purpose of this study is to develop the Sasangin Diagnosis Inventory (SDI), and verify its reliability and validity.
Methods: A questionnaire was developed for constitution diagnosis with reference to the Clinical Practice Guideline, and was subjected to expert consensus and linguistic validation for its final form. In toto, 230 patients were recruited, with 169 assigned to the training group, and 61 to the test group for the questionnaire. The reference standard was agreement in Sasang constitutional diagnosis by at least 2 of 3 experts. A predictive model was built using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm, and based on this, the diagnostic accuracy of the model was assessed in the test group.
Results: The overall Cronbach’s α for the entire set of questionnaire items was 0.72. The diagnostic accuracy of the model for the three constitutions was 68.97 % (kappa coefficient 0.5403). The diagnostic accuracy of the model for the Symptomatology Groups was 47.54 % (kappa coefficient 0.3606).
Discussions and Conclusions: SDI using the model diagnosing the three constitutions has reliability and validity in Sasang constitutional diagnosis.