RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Development of the Sasangin Diagnosis Inventory Using the Random Forest Modeling

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16960429

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 경희대학교 대학원, 2024

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2024

    • 작성언어

      영어

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      vii, 42 p. : 삽화, 도표 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      경희대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수: 이의주
      참고문헌: p. 32-33.

    • UCI식별코드

      I804:11006-200000736050

    • 소장기관
      • 경희대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Background: Sasang Constitutional Medicine (SCM), originating in Korea, categorizes individuals into four types based on physiological imbalances. Recent studies integrate AI like Random Forest to condense these questionnaires, simplifying diagnosis while maintaining accuracy, enhancing the potential of SCM for personalized medicine and preventive care.
    Aim: The purpose of this study is to develop the Sasangin Diagnosis Inventory (SDI), and verify its reliability and validity.
    Methods: A questionnaire was developed for constitution diagnosis with reference to the Clinical Practice Guideline, and was subjected to expert consensus and linguistic validation for its final form. In toto, 230 patients were recruited, with 169 assigned to the training group, and 61 to the test group for the questionnaire. The reference standard was agreement in Sasang constitutional diagnosis by at least 2 of 3 experts. A predictive model was built using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm, and based on this, the diagnostic accuracy of the model was assessed in the test group.
    Results: The overall Cronbach’s α for the entire set of questionnaire items was 0.72. The diagnostic accuracy of the model for the three constitutions was 68.97 % (kappa coefficient 0.5403). The diagnostic accuracy of the model for the Symptomatology Groups was 47.54 % (kappa coefficient 0.3606).
    Discussions and Conclusions: SDI using the model diagnosing the three constitutions has reliability and validity in Sasang constitutional diagnosis.
    번역하기

    Background: Sasang Constitutional Medicine (SCM), originating in Korea, categorizes individuals into four types based on physiological imbalances. Recent studies integrate AI like Random Forest to condense these questionnaires, simplifying diagnosis w...

    Background: Sasang Constitutional Medicine (SCM), originating in Korea, categorizes individuals into four types based on physiological imbalances. Recent studies integrate AI like Random Forest to condense these questionnaires, simplifying diagnosis while maintaining accuracy, enhancing the potential of SCM for personalized medicine and preventive care.
    Aim: The purpose of this study is to develop the Sasangin Diagnosis Inventory (SDI), and verify its reliability and validity.
    Methods: A questionnaire was developed for constitution diagnosis with reference to the Clinical Practice Guideline, and was subjected to expert consensus and linguistic validation for its final form. In toto, 230 patients were recruited, with 169 assigned to the training group, and 61 to the test group for the questionnaire. The reference standard was agreement in Sasang constitutional diagnosis by at least 2 of 3 experts. A predictive model was built using the Random Forest machine learning algorithm, and based on this, the diagnostic accuracy of the model was assessed in the test group.
    Results: The overall Cronbach’s α for the entire set of questionnaire items was 0.72. The diagnostic accuracy of the model for the three constitutions was 68.97 % (kappa coefficient 0.5403). The diagnostic accuracy of the model for the Symptomatology Groups was 47.54 % (kappa coefficient 0.3606).
    Discussions and Conclusions: SDI using the model diagnosing the three constitutions has reliability and validity in Sasang constitutional diagnosis.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ iii
    • List of Tables of the Appendix .................................................................................................. iii
    • List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... iv
    • Nomenclature ............................................................................................................................ v
    • Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... vi
    • List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ iii
    • List of Tables of the Appendix .................................................................................................. iii
    • List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... iv
    • Nomenclature ............................................................................................................................ v
    • Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... vi
    • Ⅰ. Background ........................................................................................................................... 1
    • Ⅱ. Materials and Methods ...................................................................................................... 4
    • 2.1. Study Design and Setting
    • 2.2. Questionnaire Development Process
    • 2.3. Reliability and Validity Test
    • 2.3.1. Participants and Sample Size
    • 2.3.2. Data Measure
    • 2.3.3. Reliability Test
    • 2.3.4. Validity Test
    • 2.3.4.1. Random Forest Modeling
    • 2.3.4.2. Variable Selection
    • 2.3.4.2. The Model to Diagnose Sasangin
    • 2.3.4.3. The Model to Diagnose Symptomatology Groups
    • 2.4. Statistical Analysis
    • Ⅲ. Result ................................................................................................................................ 14
    • 3.1. Questionnaire
    • 3.1.1. Design Concept of the Questionnaire
    • 3.1.2. Item Development
    • 3.1.3. Questionnaire Construction
    • 3.2. General Characteristics of Subjects
    • 3.3. Reliability Test
    • 3.4. Validity Test
    • 3.4.1. Variable Selection
    • 3.4.1.1. Response Rate of Items
    • ii
    • 3.4.1.2. Feature Importance of Explanatory Variables
    • 3.4.2. Model to Diagnose Sasangin
    • 3.4.3. Model to Diagnose Sasangin except Taeyang Type
    • 3.4.4. Model to Diagnose Symptomatology Groups
    • Ⅳ. Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 26
    • Ⅴ. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 31
    • Ⅵ. Reference .......................................................................................................................... 32
    • Appendix
    • A1. Literature Basis of the SDI
    • A2. Questionnaire
    • A3. Response Rate of All Items
    • A4. Feature Importance of Explanatory Variables
    • iii
    • List of Tables
    • Table 1. Sasang Constitutional Diagnosis Factors by Items .................................................... 17
    • Table 2. General Characteristic of Subjects ............................................................................. 18
    • Table 3. General Characteristic of the Training Group and Test Group .................................. 19
    • Table 4. Cronbach’s α of the Questionnaire ............................................................................ 20
    • Table 5. Response Rate of Items ............................................................................................. 21
    • Table 6. Confusion Matrix of the SDI model to Diagnose Sasangin ....................................... 23
    • Table 7. Validation of the SDI model to Diagnose Sasangin ................................................... 23
    • Table 8. Confusion Matrix of the SDI model to Diagnose Sasangin except Taeyang Type .... 24
    • Table 9. Validation of the SDI model to Diagnose Sasangin except Taeyang Type ................ 24
    • Table 10. Confusion Matrix of the SDI model to Diagnose Symptomatology Groups ........... 25
    • Table 11. Validation Coefficients of the SDI model to Diagnose Symptomatology Groups ... 25
    • List of Tables of the Appendix
    • Table A1. Literature Basis of the SDI ............................................................................................... 34−36
    • Table A2. Questionnaire ................................................................................................................... 37−39
    • Table A3. Response Rate of All Items .............................................................................................. 40−41
    • Table A4. Feature Importance of Explanatory Variables ........................................................................ 42
    • iv
    • List of Figures
    • Figure 1. Study design and setting ............................................................................................. 4
    • Figure 2. Random forest machine learning model ................................................................... 10
    • Figure 3. Random forest and statistical analysis flowchart ..................................................... 12
    • Figure 4. Main concept of SDI category ................................................................................. 14
    • Figure 5. Feature importance of explanatory variables ........................................................... 22
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼