RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
자동완성 버튼

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력
    あ ぁ か が さ ざ た だ な は ば ぱ ま や ゃ ら わ ゎ ん い ぃ き ぎ し じ ち ぢ に ひ び ぴ み り う ぅ く ぐ す ず つ づ っ ぬ ふ ぶ ぷ む ゆ ゅ る え ぇ け げ せ ぜ て で ね へ べ ぺ め れ お ぉ こ ご そ ぞ と ど の ほ ぼ ぽ も よ ょ ろ を
    ア ァ カ サ ザ タ ダ ナ ハ バ パ マ ヤ ャ ラ ワ ヮ ン イ ィ キ ギ シ ジ チ ヂ ニ ヒ ビ ピ ミ リ ウ ゥ ク グ ス ズ ツ ヅ ッ ヌ フ ブ プ ム ユ ュ ル エ ェ ケ ゲ セ ゼ テ デ ヘ ベ ペ メ レ オ ォ コ ゴ ソ ゾ ト ド ノ ホ ボ ポ モ ヨ ョ ロ ヲ ―

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    ㅥ ㅦ ㅧ ㅨ ㅩ ㅪ ㅫ ㅬ ㅭ ㅮ ㅯ ㅰ ㅱ ㅲ ㅳ ㅴ ㅵ ㅶ ㅷ ㅸ ㅹ ㅺ ㅻ ㅼ ㅽ ㅾ ㅿ ㆀ ㆁ ㆂ ㆃ ㆄ ㆅ ㆆ ㆇ ㆈ ㆉ ㆊ ㆋ ㆌ ㆍ ㆎ
    Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ ν ξ ο π ρ σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω
    á à Á À é è É È ç Ç ê
    Ä Ö Ü ä ö ü ß
    ְ ֳ ֲ ֱ ָ ַ ֵ ֶ ִ ֹ ּ ֻ ׂ ׁ ּ פ ם ן ו ט א ר ק ף ך ל ח י ע כ ג ד ש ץ ת צ מ נ ה ב
    ‘ ’ “ ” 〔 〕 〈 〉 「 」 『 』 【 】 ＂ （ ） ［ ］ ｛ ｝
    ± × ÷ ≠ ≤ ≥ ∞ ∴ ♂ ♀ ∠ ⊥ ⌒ ∂ ∇ ≡ ≒ ≪ ≫ √ ∽ ∝ ∵ ∫ ∬ ∈ ∋ ⊆ ⊇ ⊂ ⊃ ∪ ∩ ∧ ∨ ￢ ⇒ ⇔ ∀ ∃ ∮ ∑ ∏ ＋ － ＜ ＝ ＞
    、 。 · ‥ … ¨ 〃 ― ∥ ＼ ∼ ´ ～ ˇ ˘ ˝ ˚ ˙ ¸ ˛ ¡ ¿ ː ！ ＇ ， ． ／ ： ； ？ ＾ ＿ ｀ ｜
    ½ ⅓ ⅔ ¼ ¾ ⅛ ⅜ ⅝ ⅞ ¹ ² ³ ⁴ ⁿ ₁ ₂ ₃ ₄
    Æ Ð Ħ IJ Ł Ø Œ Þ Ŧ Ŋ æ đ ð ħ ı ij ĸ ŀ ł ø œ ß þ ŧ ŋ ʼn
    А Б В Г Д Е Ё Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Ъ Ы Ь Э Ю Я а б в г д е ё ж з и й к л м н о п р с т у ф х ц ч ш щ ъ ы ь э ю я
    ′ ″ ℃ Å ￠ ￡ ￥ ¤ ℉ ‰ ＄ ％ Ｆ ￦ ㎕ ㎖ ㎗ ℓ ㎘ ㏄ ㎣ ㎤ ㎥ ㎦ ㎙ ㎚ ㎛ ㎜ ㎝ ㎞ ㎟ ㎠ ㎡ ㎢ ㏊ ㎍ ㎎ ㎏ ㏏ ㎈ ㎉ ㏈ ㎧ ㎨ ㎰ ㎱ ㎲ ㎳ ㎴ ㎵ ㎶ ㎷ ㎸ ㎹ ㎀ ㎁ ㎂ ㎃ ㎄ ㎺ ㎻ ㎽ ㎾ ㎿ ㎐ ㎑ ㎒ ㎓ ㎔ Ω ㏀ ㏁ ㎊ ㎋ ㎌ ㏖ ㏅ ㎭ ㎮ ㎯ ㏛ ㎩ ㎪ ㎫ ㎬ ㏝ ㏐ ㏓ ㏃ ㏉ ㏜ ㏆
    § ※ ☆ ★ ○ ● ◎ ◇ ◆ □ ■ △ ▽ → ← ↑ ↓ ↔ 〓 ◁ ◀ ▷ ▶ ♤ ♠ ♡ ♥ ♧ ♣ ⊙ ◈ ▣ ◐ ◑ ▒ ▤ ▥ ▨ ▧ ▦ ▩ ♨ ☏ ☎ ☜ ☞ † ‡ ↕ ↗ ↙ ↖ ↘ ♭ ♩ ♪ ♬ ㉿ ㈜ № ㏇ ™ ㏂ ㏘ ℡ ＃ ＆ ＊ ＠ ª º
    ⅰ ⅱ ⅲ ⅳ ⅴ ⅵ ⅶ ⅷ ⅸ ⅹ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ Ⅵ Ⅶ Ⅷ Ⅸ Ⅹ
    ا ب ت ث ج ح خ د ذ ر ز س ش ص ض ط ظ ع غ ف ق ک ل م ن ه و ی
    닫기

    百濟 漢城期 對中關係 硏究 : 4~5세기 對高句麗政策의 推移와 관련하여

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15362709

    • 0

      상세조회

    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    영어
    한국어
    In the 4th century, the subject of Baekje relations with China changed from the Chinese local government to the central government. There were two ways of Baekje 's relations with China during this period: diplomatic methods through tribute and tribute, and economic methods through exchange of logistics and culture. However, this dramatic change of public relations in the 4th century was not carried out independently, but was carried out by receiving and influencing other foreign relations of Baekje. Since the fourth century, Baekje's greatest diplomatic issue has been to counter the military invasions of Goguryeo facing borders. The military confrontation between Baekje and Goguryeo was completed in 475 when the capital of Baekjae, Hansung, was captured by Goguryeo. Therefore, the top priority of Baekje foreign policy in the 4th ∼ 5th century was the Goguryeo policy and the Chinese policy had to be influenced.
    Baekje and Goguryeo faced the border for the first time as the Daebang which was located in the northern part of Baekje in 314, was destroyed by Goguryeo. And Baekje, who imported Chinese artifacts through the Daebang and Nakrang commendary, had to establish a new trade route to trade with China. With the imminent military invasion of Goguryeo, Baekje hastily pioneered a new trade route with China, and as a result, succeeded in trading with Eastern Jin(東晉) in the middle of the 4th century. In general, it is common for economic relations between countries to be established after diplomatic relations are established. At the time, however, Eastern Jin was not able to control the central government, and the aristocratic power was strong. Thus, before the formal diplomatic relations between Baekje and Eastern Jin, Baekje and Eastern Jin nobles were able to open their trade first.
    Baekje officially established diplomatic relations with Eastern Jin in 372, during the course of the war with Goguryeo in earnest. At that time, Baekje and Goguryeo were fighting over the territorial rights of Nakrang and Daebang areas, and Paekje was able to reinforce the justification for dominating these areas by being formally fired from Eastern Jin. The tribute to the tribunal of the period from the Geunchogo-king to the Ashin King was carried out with such a very political purpose. Baekje was defeated in the territorial dispute by declaring surrender to King Asukin and finally to King Gwangyogyeong. At the same time, the tributary relationship with Eastern Jin was cut off for a while. Baekje wanted to reinforce its relationship with Eastern Jin at the beginning of the 5th century. Baekje needed to strengthen its political and economic exchanges with China in order to defeat itself in the war against Goguryeo and to secure internal stability. This movement was reinforced by the fact that the clan Jin , which had led the war with Goguryeo in Baekje, collapsed and the defenders of Koguryo clan Hae were defended. However, there was a change in the inside of Eastern Jin in China at the time, such as the destruction of Eastern Jin and the newly founding of Liu Song(劉宋) and the full-scale public relations resumed in Liu Song.
    In order to control the movement of the aristocracy, Liu Song was to strengthen the control of the province and to establish a power system centered on the imperial court. As a result, the private trade between Baekje and China was greatly reduced, and Baekje changed its policy to strengthen the postal services. Until the 4th century, the relation between the tribute and the tribute was stronger than the political character, but the relationship between the tribute and the tribute in the 5th century was strengthened.
    In 455, Goguryeo resumed attacks against Baekje and Silla, and Baekje had to choose whether to continue to defend itself or to attack. King Gogol tried to push the aggressive force by changing the existing policy on Goguryeo, which was placed in the position of the Sun power. So King Gaero tried to strengthen his position by reorganizing the power system centered on the royal family. In this process, King Gaero was asked to fill out the royal family for the relocation and approved the public relations to strengthen the kingship. For the first time in the history of Baekje, King Gaero promoted a military alliance with Northern Wei. King Gongo proposed to attack the Goguryeo by the union of Northern Wei and Baekje, which were behind Goguryeo. This is the first example of military use of Koguryeo by Chinese forces. Although King Gaero's attempt was abandoned by the Northern Wei's refusal, the fact that he attempted to use the public relations for military purposes was different from the previous period. As King Gaero continued to attack Goguryeo, Goguryeo felt the need to stop Baekje's oppression. King Jangsoo Goguryeo invaded Baekje in 475 BC by using the period when the Northern Wei army abandoned the military activities, and destroyed Hansung and removed King Gaero. Baekje used public relations in accordance with his purpose for each period, and the pattern of public relations was also affected by the situation with Goguryeo.
    번역하기

    In the 4th century, the subject of Baekje relations with China changed from the Chinese local government to the central government. There were two ways of Baekje 's relations with China during this period: diplomatic methods through tribute and tribut...

    In the 4th century, the subject of Baekje relations with China changed from the Chinese local government to the central government. There were two ways of Baekje 's relations with China during this period: diplomatic methods through tribute and tribute, and economic methods through exchange of logistics and culture. However, this dramatic change of public relations in the 4th century was not carried out independently, but was carried out by receiving and influencing other foreign relations of Baekje. Since the fourth century, Baekje's greatest diplomatic issue has been to counter the military invasions of Goguryeo facing borders. The military confrontation between Baekje and Goguryeo was completed in 475 when the capital of Baekjae, Hansung, was captured by Goguryeo. Therefore, the top priority of Baekje foreign policy in the 4th ∼ 5th century was the Goguryeo policy and the Chinese policy had to be influenced.
    Baekje and Goguryeo faced the border for the first time as the Daebang which was located in the northern part of Baekje in 314, was destroyed by Goguryeo. And Baekje, who imported Chinese artifacts through the Daebang and Nakrang commendary, had to establish a new trade route to trade with China. With the imminent military invasion of Goguryeo, Baekje hastily pioneered a new trade route with China, and as a result, succeeded in trading with Eastern Jin(東晉) in the middle of the 4th century. In general, it is common for economic relations between countries to be established after diplomatic relations are established. At the time, however, Eastern Jin was not able to control the central government, and the aristocratic power was strong. Thus, before the formal diplomatic relations between Baekje and Eastern Jin, Baekje and Eastern Jin nobles were able to open their trade first.
    Baekje officially established diplomatic relations with Eastern Jin in 372, during the course of the war with Goguryeo in earnest. At that time, Baekje and Goguryeo were fighting over the territorial rights of Nakrang and Daebang areas, and Paekje was able to reinforce the justification for dominating these areas by being formally fired from Eastern Jin. The tribute to the tribunal of the period from the Geunchogo-king to the Ashin King was carried out with such a very political purpose. Baekje was defeated in the territorial dispute by declaring surrender to King Asukin and finally to King Gwangyogyeong. At the same time, the tributary relationship with Eastern Jin was cut off for a while. Baekje wanted to reinforce its relationship with Eastern Jin at the beginning of the 5th century. Baekje needed to strengthen its political and economic exchanges with China in order to defeat itself in the war against Goguryeo and to secure internal stability. This movement was reinforced by the fact that the clan Jin , which had led the war with Goguryeo in Baekje, collapsed and the defenders of Koguryo clan Hae were defended. However, there was a change in the inside of Eastern Jin in China at the time, such as the destruction of Eastern Jin and the newly founding of Liu Song(劉宋) and the full-scale public relations resumed in Liu Song.
    In order to control the movement of the aristocracy, Liu Song was to strengthen the control of the province and to establish a power system centered on the imperial court. As a result, the private trade between Baekje and China was greatly reduced, and Baekje changed its policy to strengthen the postal services. Until the 4th century, the relation between the tribute and the tribute was stronger than the political character, but the relationship between the tribute and the tribute in the 5th century was strengthened.
    In 455, Goguryeo resumed attacks against Baekje and Silla, and Baekje had to choose whether to continue to defend itself or to attack. King Gogol tried to push the aggressive force by changing the existing policy on Goguryeo, which was placed in the position of the Sun power. So King Gaero tried to strengthen his position by reorganizing the power system centered on the royal family. In this process, King Gaero was asked to fill out the royal family for the relocation and approved the public relations to strengthen the kingship. For the first time in the history of Baekje, King Gaero promoted a military alliance with Northern Wei. King Gongo proposed to attack the Goguryeo by the union of Northern Wei and Baekje, which were behind Goguryeo. This is the first example of military use of Koguryeo by Chinese forces. Although King Gaero's attempt was abandoned by the Northern Wei's refusal, the fact that he attempted to use the public relations for military purposes was different from the previous period. As King Gaero continued to attack Goguryeo, Goguryeo felt the need to stop Baekje's oppression. King Jangsoo Goguryeo invaded Baekje in 475 BC by using the period when the Northern Wei army abandoned the military activities, and destroyed Hansung and removed King Gaero. Baekje used public relations in accordance with his purpose for each period, and the pattern of public relations was also affected by the situation with Goguryeo.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 序論 1
    • 1. 연구의 주제와 목적 1
    • 2. 연구사와 연구방법 6
    • Ⅱ. 45세기 對中關係의 형식과 시기구분 13
    • 1. 4세기 對中關係형식의 변화 13
    • I. 序論 1
    • 1. 연구의 주제와 목적 1
    • 2. 연구사와 연구방법 6
    • Ⅱ. 45세기 對中關係의 형식과 시기구분 13
    • 1. 4세기 對中關係형식의 변화 13
    • 2. 45세기 對中關係의 時期區分 35
    • Ⅲ. 4세기 對東晉關係의 형성 46
    • 1. 4세기 초 百濟-東晉간 交易의 성립 46
    • 1) 사료와 유물에 나타난 對東晉交易 46
    • 2) 百濟-東晉간 交易의 배경과 성격 55
    • 3) 對東晉交易路의 개척 61
    • 2. 近肖古王代 高句麗와의 대립과 朝貢冊封關係의 성립 65
    • 3. 4세기 말 對高句麗전쟁의 추이와 對東晉關係 78
    • 1) 對高句麗戰爭期 佛敎受容의 정치적 의미 78
    • 2) 阿莘王代 對高句麗전쟁의 패배와 對東晉朝貢의 단절 86
    • Ⅳ. 5세기 전반 對南朝關係의 확립 95
    • 1. 支王代 지배층의 재편과 對東晉朝貢의 재개 95
    • 2. 久爾辛王代 對中交易의 변화 103
    • 3. 毗有王代 對劉宋關係의 전개 117
    • 1) 對劉宋關係의 강화와 그 원인 117
    • 2) 毗有王代 對劉宋關係의 성격 127
    • Ⅴ. 蓋鹵王代 對南北朝關係의 전개 138
    • 1. 蓋鹵王代 高句麗의 남하와 지배층의 개편 138
    • 2. 蓋鹵王의 王侯制 시행과 對劉宋關係 149
    • 3. 對高句麗 공세정책과 對北魏外交 161
    • 1) 對北魏外交의 목적과 추진과정 161
    • 2) 漢城陷落의 국제적 요인 174
    • Ⅵ. 結論 182
    • 參考文獻 191
    • Abstract 201
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. 중국과의 관계, 徐榮洙, 충남도역사문화연구원 , 百濟의 對外關係, , 2007

    2. 韓中朝貢關係考, 全海宗, 동양사학회, 東洋史學硏究1, , 1966

    3. 낙랑군연구, 權五重, 일조각, , 1992

    4. 고구려사 연구, 노태돈, 사계절, , 1999

    5. 北燕에 대하여(III), 지배선, 東洋史學硏究32, , 1990

    6. 三國史記硏究, 盧重國, 일조각, , 1990

    7. 韓國史古代篇, 李丙燾, 을유문화사, , 1959

    8. 三韓과 樂浪의 교섭, 尹龍九, 한국고대사연구34, , 2004

    9. 晋書의 馬韓과 百濟, 兪元載, 韓國上古史學會, 韓國上古史學報17, , 1994

    10. (國譯)三國史記, 李丙燾, 을유문화사, , 1977

    1. 중국과의 관계, 徐榮洙, 충남도역사문화연구원 , 百濟의 對外關係, , 2007

    2. 韓中朝貢關係考, 全海宗, 동양사학회, 東洋史學硏究1, , 1966

    3. 낙랑군연구, 權五重, 일조각, , 1992

    4. 고구려사 연구, 노태돈, 사계절, , 1999

    5. 北燕에 대하여(III), 지배선, 東洋史學硏究32, , 1990

    6. 三國史記硏究, 盧重國, 일조각, , 1990

    7. 韓國史古代篇, 李丙燾, 을유문화사, , 1959

    8. 三韓과 樂浪의 교섭, 尹龍九, 한국고대사연구34, , 2004

    9. 晋書의 馬韓과 百濟, 兪元載, 韓國上古史學會, 韓國上古史學報17, , 1994

    10. (國譯)三國史記, 李丙燾, 을유문화사, , 1977

    11. 『韓國古代史硏究』, 李丙燾, 박영사, , 1976

    12. 百濟政治史硏究, 盧重國, 일조각, , 1988

    13. 韓中關係史硏究, 全海宗, 일조각, , 1970

    14. 木棺墓에서 木槨墓로, 李盛周, 新羅文化14, , 1997

    15. 百濟의 對中關係小考, 崔槿黙, 百濟硏究2, , 1971

    16. 백제불교사 연구, 趙景徹, 지식산업사, , 2015

    17. 육조시대의 남경, 劉淑芬, 경인문화사, , 2007

    18. 南朝와 高句麗의 關係, 金鍾完, 高句麗硏究14, , 2002

    19. 目支國에 대한 一考察, 盧重國, 百濟論叢2, , 1990

    20. 羅濟同盟에 관한 연구, 金秉柱, 韓國史硏究 46, , 1984

    21. 朝貢의 起源과 그 意味, 李春植, 中國學報10, , 1969

    22. 영역 확장과 국가 성장, 金起燮, 서울역사편찬원 , 서울 2천년사3-한성백제 건국과 발전, , 2015

    23. 4세기 백제사 연구, 姜鍾元, 서경문화사, , 2002

    24. 高句麗佛敎傳來의 一考, 지배선, 漢城大論文集, , 1987

    25. 魏晉南北朝의 東夷校尉, 李周鉉, 소나무, 한중관계 2000년, , 2008

    26. 漢城百濟의 中央과 地方, 朴淳發, 충남대 백제연구소, 百濟의 中央과 地方, , 1997

    27. 한성기 중국의 문물교류, 임영진, 충남역사문화연구원 , 百濟의 文物交流, , 2007

    28. 傳統的東アジア秩序試論, 猪口孝, 國際法外交雜誌73-5호, , 1975

    29. 고대 삼국의 불교와 정치, 趙景徹, 百濟文化51., , 2014

    30. 백제학 연구 현황과 과제, 盧重國, 한성백제박물관 , 백제, 누가 언제 세웠나, , 2013

    31. 中國正史百濟傳硏究, 兪元載, 학연문화사, , 1993

    32. 백제사회사상사연구, 盧重國, 지식산업사, , 2010

    33. ‘樂浪史’ 時代區分試論, 權五重, 한국고대사연구53, , 2009

    34. 高句麗佛敎傳來의 諸問題, 金煐泰, 佛敎學報23, , 1986

    35. 韓國古代史의 新硏究, 申瀅植, 일조각, , 1984

    36. 韓國古代史의 新硏究, 盧重國, 일조각, , 1990

    37. 三國과 南北朝交涉의 性格, 徐榮洙, 東洋學11, , 1981

    38. 伯濟國에서 百濟로의 전환, 權五榮, 역사와 현실40, , 2001

    39. 對外關係史에서 본 樂浪郡, 徐榮洙, 史學志31, , 1998

    40. 弁辰韓鐵器의 初現과 展開, 孫明助, 伽倻文化11, , 1998

    41. 韓國史講座Ⅰ(古代篇), 李基白, 李基東, 일조각, , 1982

    42. 三韓의 對中交涉과 그 성격, 尹龍九, 國史館論叢85, , 1999

    43. 帶方郡의 盛衰에 대한 硏究, 宋知娟, 史學硏究74, , 2004

    44. 漢城期百濟對中國交涉一例, 朴淳發, 호서고고학11, , 2004

    45. 三國時代王의 統治形態硏究, 金瑛河, 고려대 박사학위논문, , 1989

    46. 北朝前期佛敎의 高句麗傳來, 李龍範, 東國大論文集12, , 1973

    47. 羅濟同盟期新羅와 百濟關係, 鄭雲龍, 白山學報46, , 1996

    48. 古代韓中關係史의 硏究, 金庠基, 삼지사, , 1987

    49. 北魏의 對外政策과 胡漢體制, 朴漢濟, 歷史學報116, , 1987

    50. 漢城百濟의 對外交流와 佛敎, 吉基泰, 백제연구55, , 2012

    51. 馬韓領域에서의 百濟의 成長, 李基東, 馬韓百濟文化10, , 1987

    52. 중국의 역사-위진남북조, 川勝義雄, 혜안, , 2004

    53. 동진과 전연의 관계에 대하여, 지배선, 동양사학연구62, , 1998

    54. 古代中國的世界秩序硏究, 김한규, 일조각, , 1982

    55. 백제의 대외 교섭과 교류, 盧重國, 지식산업사, , 2012

    56. 百濟의 對中國郡縣關係一考察, 文安植, 傳統文化硏究96, , 1996

    57. 5∼6세기 고구려와 백제의 관계, 盧重國, 북방사논총11, , 2006

    58. 三國時代人質의 성격에 대하여, 양기석, 史學志15, , 1981

    59. 樂浪郡의 推移와 嶺西地域樂浪, 李道學, 東아시아古代學34, , 2014

    60. 漢城百濟의 時間的上限과 下限, 權五榮, 백제연구53, , 2011

    61. 高句麗의 遼西進出企圖와 突厥, 李龍範, 史學硏究4, , 1959

    62. 중국과의 대외관계와 문물교류, 尹龍九, 서울시사편찬위원회 , 漢城百濟史4, , 2008

    63. 중국과의 대외관계와 문물교류, 尹龍九, 서울시사편찬위원회 , 漢城百濟史4, , 2009

    64. 4세기 百濟의 地方統制方式一例, 權五榮, 韓國史論18, , 1988

    65. 三韓의 朝貢貿易에 대한 一考察, 尹龍九, 역사학보162, , 1999

    66. 백제전제왕권성립과정연구, 양기석, 단국대 박사논문, , 1990

    67. 三國時代韓中外交의 전개와 성격, 徐榮洙, 삼지원 , 古代韓中關係史의 硏究, , 1987

    68. 百濟熊津奠都와 貴族勢力의 動向, 姜鍾元, 한국고대사연구52, , 2008

    69. 백제 한성시대 통치체제연구, 金起燮, 한국정신문화연구원 박사논문, , 1997

    70. 百濟의 王侯號將軍號制와 그 運營, 盧重國, 백제연구55, , 2012

    71. 백제의 발흥과 대왜국관계의 성립, 李基東, 정신문화연구원 , 고대한일문화교류연구, , 1990

    72. 三國史記에 보이는 貊의 實體, 金澤均, 白山學報69, , 2004

    73. 사창리 山10-1번지 출토유물의 소개, 權五榮, 權度希, 한신대 박물관 , 吉城里土城, , 2003

    74. 3세기 이전 마한백제의 성장과 중국, 尹龍九, 한성백제박물관 , 백제의 성장과 중국, , 2015

    75. 5세기 百濟의 王 侯 太守制에 대하여, 양기석, 史學硏究38, , 1984

    76. 百濟初期史에 관한 文獻資料의 檢討, 李道學, 한국학논집23, , 1993

    77. 百濟王室의 南遷과 支配勢力의 變遷, 盧重國, 韓國史論4, , 1978

    78. 백제의 대중교섭의 진전과 문화변동, 權五榮, 강좌 한국고대사4, , 2003

    79. 웅진시대 백제의 영역재편과 왕후제, 田中俊明, 충남대 백제연구소 , 백제의 중앙과 지방, , 1997

    80. 三國史記에 보이는 靺鞨의 實體, 金澤均, 高句麗硏究3, , 1997

    81. 4세기 백제-왜 관계의 성립과 그 배경, 姜鍾薰, 역사와 현실40, , 2001

    82. 개로왕의 왕권 강화 시도와 한성 함락, 文安植, 서울역사편찬원 , 한성백제의 건국과 발전, , 2015

    83. 4∼5세기 高句麗의 佛敎수용과 그 성격, 趙宇然, 韓國古代史探究7, , 2011

    84. 장순용譯, 漢魏兩晉南北朝佛敎史2, 湯用彤, 학고방, , 2014

    85. 5세기 高句麗의 南方進出과 對新羅關係, 張彰恩, 고구려발해연구44, , 2012

    86. 中國史書에 보이는 百濟王牟都에 대하여, 李基東, 역사학보62, , 1974

    87. 漢城後期의 百濟王權과 支配體制의 整備, 李道學, 百濟論叢2, , 1990

    88. 韓倭의 政治勢力과 樂浪郡帶方郡의 關係, 이종욱, , 1986

    89. 고구려의 대외관계와 북아시아 유목국가, 盧泰敦, 동양학58, , 2015

    90. 三國史記本紀에 나타난 靺鞨의 性格, 金鎭光, 高句麗渤海硏究35, , 2009

    91. 三國史記에 보이는 靺鞨의 軍事活動, 李康來, 領土問題硏究2, , 1985

    92. 5世紀韓日關係史-宋書 倭人傳의 檢討, 盧重國, 한일역사공동연구위원회, 한일역사 공동연구보고서1, , 2005

    93. 신라 상고기 정치변동과 고구려 관계, 장창은, 신서원, , 2008

    94. 4∼5世紀高句麗의 南下와 三國의 領域向方, 張彰恩, 한국학논총34, , 2010

    95. 章輝玉譯, 中國佛敎史1-初傳期의 佛敎, 鎌田茂雄, 장승, , 1992

    96. 樂浪前期郡縣支配勢力의 種族系統과 性格, 尹龍九, 歷史學報126, , 1990

    97. 百濟文化의 이해를 위한 中國六朝文化탐색, 權五榮, 한국고대사연구37, , 2005

    98. 백제 漢城時代불교수용과 정치세력의 변화, 趙景徹, 韓國思想史學18, , 2002

    99. 北伐을 통해 본 東晉朝廷의 國家權과 皇帝權, 金裕哲, 魏晉隋唐史硏究6, , 1995

    100. 三國史記羅濟本紀의 靺鞨史料에 대하여, 文安植, 한국고대사연구13, , 1998

    101. 三國志 韓傳對外關係記事에 대한 一檢討, 尹龍九, 충남대학교, 馬韓史硏究, , 1998

    102. 한성말 웅진시대 백제왕위계승과 왕권의 성격, 李道學, 韓國史硏究50 51합집, , 1985

    103. 三國史記<新羅本紀> 上代靺鞨記事의 檢討, 宣石悅, 釜山史學17, , 1993

    104. 樂浪郡을 통해 본 古代中國內屬郡의 性格, 權五重, 서강대 박사학위논문, , 1987

    105. ｢요동 공손씨정권의 대방군 설치와 그 의미｣, 權五重, 대구사학105, , 2011

    106. 4∼5세기 동아시아 국제정세와 백제의 외교정책, 金起燮, 백제문화56, , 2017

    107. 「廣開土王碑文에 보이는 倭關係記事의 檢討」, 延敏洙, 『東國史學』21, , 1987

    108. 광개토대왕비문에 보이는 백제관계기사의 검토, 李基東, 백제연구17, , 1987

    109. 개로왕의 왕권강화와 국정운영의 변화에 대하여, 文安植, 사학연구78, , 2005

    110. 東晉時代敎權과 王權의 대립에 대한 비판적 고찰, 차차석, 東國思想22, , 1989

    111. 한성시기 백제의 宋 北魏와의 외교 배경과 그 양상, 박현숙, 선사와 고대51, , 2017

    112. 三國史記 初期記錄에 보이는 ‘樂浪’의 實體, 姜鍾薰, 韓國古代史硏究10, , 1995

    113. 5∼6世紀東아시아의 國際情勢와 高句麗의 對外關係, 盧泰敦, 동방학지44, , 1984

    114. 馬韓과 樂浪帶方郡과의 군사 충돌과 目支國의 쇠퇴, 盧重國, 大丘史學71, , 2003

    115. 南北朝時代의 中國的世界秩序와 古代韓國의 幕府制, 金翰奎, 일조각, 韓國古代의 國家와 社會, 歷史學會編, , 1985

    116. 高句麗, 百濟, 新羅사이의 力關係변천에 대한 일고찰, 盧重國, 동방학지28, , 1981

    117. 개로왕의 체제개혁과 그 한계 , 漢城都邑期의 百濟, 주보돈, 충남역사문화연구원, , 2007

    118. 三國史記 초기기록에 보이는 낙랑의 실체에 대하여, 文安植, 전통문화논총6, , 2008

    119. 한성후기 백제 대외관계의 변화가 지방통치에 미친 영향, 姜鍾元, 역사와 담론81, , 2017

    120. 「廣開土王陵碑再論」, 『全海宗博士華甲紀念史學論叢』, 千寬宇, 일조각, , 1979

    121. 北魏文明太后의 時代- 政治勢力間의 對立樣相을 中心으로-, 金聖熙, 中國古代史硏究7, , 2001

    122. 越州窯靑瓷를 伴出한 忠南의 百濟土器-4世紀百濟土器 其二, 小田富士雄, 忠南大學校開校30周年記念特輯號, 百濟硏究, , 1982

    123. 三國史記 道林記事檢討를 통해 본 百濟蓋鹵王代政治狀況, 李道學, 선사와 고대27, , 2007

    124. 百濟初期東界의 形成에 관한 一考察; 靺鞨과의 關係를 中心으로, 張元燮, 淸溪史學7, , 1990

    125. 불교의 중국 정복-중국에서의 불교의 수용과 변용, 최연식譯, Erik Z rcher, C I R, , 2010

    126. 三國史記 百濟本紀에 보이는 靺鞨과 樂浪의 位置에 대한 再檢討, 金起燮, 淸溪史學8, , 1991

    127. 晉書慕容皝載記와 資治通鑑 晉穆帝紀所載‘百濟’관련 기사의 사료적가치, 姜鍾薰, 大丘史學121, , 2015

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼