RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    대학생의 완벽주의적 자기제시와 대인관계문제에 따른 집단 분류와 스트레스 대처방식, 자기격려, 사회적 자기효능감의 집단 간 차이 = Clustering by perfectionistic self-presentation and interpersonal problems and group differences in stress coping strategies, self-encouragement ,social self-efficacy among college students

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14709745

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      진주 : 경상대학교, 2018

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 경상대학교 대학원 , 심리학과 , 2018

    • 발행연도

      2018

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      180 판사항(6)

    • DDC

      150 판사항(23)

    • 발행국(도시)

      경상남도

    • 형태사항

      vi, 69장 : 도표 ; 30 cm

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수: 양난미
      권말부록: 설문지
      참고문헌: 장 53-62

    • 소장기관
      • 경상국립대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine natural grouping of people in terms of level of perfectionistic self-presentation and sub-factors of interpersonal problems. For this purpose of the study, a sample of 450 college students completed a survey packet including Perfectionistic Self
    Presentation Scale-K(PSPS-K), Inventory of Interpersonal Problem Circumplex(IIP-C), The Ways of Coping Check-list, Self-encouragement Scale, Social Self-efficacy Scale. As a result of cluster analysis using 433 copies of data except for 17 copies of the collected questionnaires that were inadequately responded or missing information, it was classified into four groups as follows. First, the hiding imperfection group showed higher perfectionistic self-presentation and interpersonal problems, higher emotion
    relaxation coping than the other groups, and lower levels of
    self-encouragement and social self–efficacy. On the other hand, the perfectionistic self-presentation available group is a group with high perfectionistic self-presentation tendency but low interpersonal problems. It uses problem-focused coping, emotional relaxation coping, wishful thinking coping, and higher levels of self-encouragement and social self-efficacy. Also, the group experiencing genuine relationships showed the lowest level of perfectionistic self-presentation and interpersonal problems, and the most common use of seeking social support among the four groups, and emotional relaxation coping and wishful thinking coping showed the lowest level. This group also showed the highest self-encouragement and social self-efficacy. Finally, the Interpersonal dissatisfaction group showed lower perfectionistic self-presentation than the average, but showed a higher score than the average in ’moving toward people’ and ’moving away from people’. And showing lower stress coping strategies than the other groups, The level of self-encouragement and social self-efficacy was also low. The purpose of this study is to find out the ways in which Korean university student’s efforts to present themselves perfectly related to the interpersonal problems in order to devise a differentiated intervention plan for university students who have difficulties in interpersonal relations.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine natural grouping of people in terms of level of perfectionistic self-presentation and sub-factors of interpersonal problems. For this purpose of the study, a sample of 450 college students completed a survey pa...

    The purpose of this study was to examine natural grouping of people in terms of level of perfectionistic self-presentation and sub-factors of interpersonal problems. For this purpose of the study, a sample of 450 college students completed a survey packet including Perfectionistic Self
    Presentation Scale-K(PSPS-K), Inventory of Interpersonal Problem Circumplex(IIP-C), The Ways of Coping Check-list, Self-encouragement Scale, Social Self-efficacy Scale. As a result of cluster analysis using 433 copies of data except for 17 copies of the collected questionnaires that were inadequately responded or missing information, it was classified into four groups as follows. First, the hiding imperfection group showed higher perfectionistic self-presentation and interpersonal problems, higher emotion
    relaxation coping than the other groups, and lower levels of
    self-encouragement and social self–efficacy. On the other hand, the perfectionistic self-presentation available group is a group with high perfectionistic self-presentation tendency but low interpersonal problems. It uses problem-focused coping, emotional relaxation coping, wishful thinking coping, and higher levels of self-encouragement and social self-efficacy. Also, the group experiencing genuine relationships showed the lowest level of perfectionistic self-presentation and interpersonal problems, and the most common use of seeking social support among the four groups, and emotional relaxation coping and wishful thinking coping showed the lowest level. This group also showed the highest self-encouragement and social self-efficacy. Finally, the Interpersonal dissatisfaction group showed lower perfectionistic self-presentation than the average, but showed a higher score than the average in ’moving toward people’ and ’moving away from people’. And showing lower stress coping strategies than the other groups, The level of self-encouragement and social self-efficacy was also low. The purpose of this study is to find out the ways in which Korean university student’s efforts to present themselves perfectly related to the interpersonal problems in order to devise a differentiated intervention plan for university students who have difficulties in interpersonal relations.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 개관 10
    • 1) 완벽주의적 자기제시 10
    • (1) 완벽주의적 자기제시의 개념 및 특징 10
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 이론적 배경 및 선행연구 개관 10
    • 1) 완벽주의적 자기제시 10
    • (1) 완벽주의적 자기제시의 개념 및 특징 10
    • 2) 대인관계문제 13
    • (1) 대인관계문제의 개념 및 특징 13
    • (2) 완벽주의적 자기제시와 대인관계문제 15
    • 3) 완벽주의적 자기제시와 대인관계문제 및 관련 변인과의 관계 17
    • (1) 완벽주의적 자기제시와 대인관계문제 및 스트레스 대처방식 17
    • (2) 완벽주의적 자기제시와 대인관계문제 및 자기격려 20
    • (3) 완벽주의적 자기제시와 대인관계문제 및 사회적 자기효능감 22
    • 3. 연구문제 및 가설 24
    • Ⅱ. 연구방법 25
    • 1. 연구대상 25
    • 2. 연구절차 26
    • 3. 측정도구 27
    • 1) 한국판 완벽주의적 자기제시 척도(Perfectionistic Self Presentation Scale-Korean version: PSPS-K) 27
    • 2) 단축형 한국판 대인관계문제검사 원형척도 (Short form of the Korean Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex Scale: KIIP-SC) 28
    • 3) 스트레스 대처방식 척도(The Ways of Coping Check-list) 30
    • 4) 자기격려 척도(Self Encouragement Inventory) 31
    • 5) 사회적 자기효능감 척도(Social Self-efficacy Scale) 32
    • 4. 분석방법 33
    • Ⅲ. 연 구 결 과 34
    • 1. 각 변인들의 기술통계 및 상관관계 34
    • 2. 완벽주의적 자기제시와 대인관계문제에 따른 적정 군집 탐색 37
    • 3. 군집유형별 인구통계학적 특성 및 스트레스 대처방식, 자기격려, 사회적 자기효능감의 차이 40
    • 1) 군집유형에 따른 인구통계학적 차이 40
    • 2) 군집유형에 따른 스트레스 대처방식, 자기격려, 사회적 자기효능감의 차이 42
    • Ⅳ. 논의 45
    • Ⅴ. 참고문헌 53
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼