RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      중등학생용 간편형 과학 학습정서 검사지 개발 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14388720

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        공주 : 공주대학교 대학원, 2017

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(석사) -- 공주대학교 대학원 , 물리교육학과 , 2017. 2

      • 발행연도

        2017

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 발행국(도시)

        충청남도

      • 기타서명

        (The) Development of a Concise Science Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Secondary School Students

      • 형태사항

        ⅴ, 49 장 : 표 ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 이희복
        참고문헌(41-43 장) 수록

      • 소장기관
        • 국립공주대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to develop a concise Science Achievement Emotions Questionnaire(S-AEQ) suitable for the secondary school students using the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire(AEQ) created by Pekrun et al.(2002). The original questionnaire consists of 232 questions related to the Achievement Emotions, and is geared towards university students. There are several complications when trying to adapt this AEQ to Korean secondary school students. First, the cultural differences in the learning experience of Korean students and students from other countries. Second, we thought 232 questions are too many for secondary school students to answer. As a result, the questions were translated to Korean by three research scientists and six Korean science teachers, who were also graduate students. The learning environment in Korea as well as question comprehension of Korean secondary school students were considered. The translated questions were revised and verified for content validity by specialists in gifted education and science education. A test using the S-AEQ was given to 426 middle and high school students; 305 available test questions were used. We used probability factor analysis on the results of the 305 questions and simplified the three situations of class, learning, and test into two categories: class-learning, test. Through exploratory factor analysis, we were able to narrow down the questions to 42 for class-learning situations and 37 for test situation. These results came from the 4-6 categories we distinguished based on commonalities we detected in the test questions. Finally, the reliability of the chosen questions was reanalyzed and 7 more questions were removed. As a result of our study, we developed a concise S-AEQ for secondary school students consisting of 39 questions for class-learning situations and 33 questions for the test situation.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to develop a concise Science Achievement Emotions Questionnaire(S-AEQ) suitable for the secondary school students using the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire(AEQ) created by Pekrun et al.(2002). The original questionnaire...

      The purpose of this study is to develop a concise Science Achievement Emotions Questionnaire(S-AEQ) suitable for the secondary school students using the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire(AEQ) created by Pekrun et al.(2002). The original questionnaire consists of 232 questions related to the Achievement Emotions, and is geared towards university students. There are several complications when trying to adapt this AEQ to Korean secondary school students. First, the cultural differences in the learning experience of Korean students and students from other countries. Second, we thought 232 questions are too many for secondary school students to answer. As a result, the questions were translated to Korean by three research scientists and six Korean science teachers, who were also graduate students. The learning environment in Korea as well as question comprehension of Korean secondary school students were considered. The translated questions were revised and verified for content validity by specialists in gifted education and science education. A test using the S-AEQ was given to 426 middle and high school students; 305 available test questions were used. We used probability factor analysis on the results of the 305 questions and simplified the three situations of class, learning, and test into two categories: class-learning, test. Through exploratory factor analysis, we were able to narrow down the questions to 42 for class-learning situations and 37 for test situation. These results came from the 4-6 categories we distinguished based on commonalities we detected in the test questions. Finally, the reliability of the chosen questions was reanalyzed and 7 more questions were removed. As a result of our study, we developed a concise S-AEQ for secondary school students consisting of 39 questions for class-learning situations and 33 questions for the test situation.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구 내용 3
      • II. 이론적 배경 4
      • I. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구 내용 3
      • II. 이론적 배경 4
      • 1. 정서의 개념 4
      • 2. 학습정서의 가치-통제 이론 5
      • 1) 학습정서 5
      • 2) 가치-통제 이론 6
      • 3) 다양한 학습정서 10
      • 3. 학습정서의 영역 특수성 13
      • 4. 학습정서 검사지 14
      • 1) 영어판 학습정서 검사지의 체계 14
      • 2) 다양한 학습정서 검사지 14
      • 3) AEQ의 이론적 체계 15
      • 4) AEQ에 측정되는 정서들이 선택된 이유 16
      • 5) AEQ의 개발 과정 16
      • III. 연구 방법 17
      • 1. 연구 절차 17
      • 2. 자료 처리 방법 18
      • 1) 과학 학습정서 검사지 문항 수정 18
      • 2) 전문가 내용타당도 검증 18
      • 3) 대규모 집단에 대한 검사 실시 19
      • 4) 요인분석 가능성 점검 20
      • 5) 탐색적 요인분석을 통한 문항 추출 20
      • 6) 신뢰도 분석 21
      • IV. 연구 결과 22
      • 1. 검사문항별 평균과 표준편차 22
      • 2. 요인분석 가능성 점검 33
      • 3. 탐색적 요인분석 34
      • 4. 신뢰도 분석 35
      • 5. 간편형 과학 학습정서 검사지 37
      • V. 결론 및 제언 39
      • 1. 결론 39
      • 2. 제언 40
      • 참고문헌 41
      • ABSTRACT 44
      • 부록 47
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼