This study aims to understand existential tension surrounding lives of Korean youth generation by focusing on youth ‘activity’. It investigates how youth activity as a new way of life is beingconstituted from discursive, institutional and practica...
This study aims to understand existential tension surrounding lives of Korean youth generation by focusing on youth ‘activity’. It investigates how youth activity as a new way of life is beingconstituted from discursive, institutional and practical dimensions. By discourse analysis and in-depth interview, I examined representations of youth generation, Seoul Youth Hub as youth managing institution and practical orientation of youth activists.
Chapter Ⅱ discusses the discursive moment of youth activity, arguing that the concept of activity has appeared on a double crisis of youth caused by the fall of youth representation as subjects of political movement and the rise of youth representation as problematized workforce. Youth activity, suggested as a way of life ensuring both economic survival and social influence, has been interpellating new subjects of youth overcoming political and economic failure.
Chapter Ⅲ focuses on the institutional moment by explaining the role of Seoul Youth Hub in materializing and diffusing youth activity as an alternative lifestyle. After the election of civic activist Park, Won Soon as the mayor, Seoul has been promoting youth participation in proposing and performing its youth policy. Seoul Youth Hub, established in 2013 by suggestion from civic activists and youth themselves, is formally designed as an institution managing youth job policies. However, in actuality it is operating as an open space for youth supporting their social activities and voluntary communities, while educating youth individuals as active citizens and innovative activists. The subjectification project of youth in Seoul Youth Hub was made possible by materializing an ideal way of life called activity, that is at the same time socially meaningful, voluntary and economically
sustainable.
Chapter Ⅳ demonstrates how youth activists from Seoul Youth Hub partially reflect the logic of discursive representation and institutional subjectification, but also express unsolvable tension of the actual site. They were heterogeneous individuals having different reasons for beginning activity and different focus of social issues. Nevertheless, they had similar practical orientation―being aware of the impossibility of systemic revolution and therefore pursuing cultural change. Youth activists who were realizing activity as their job showed a rejection toward normative transition to adulthood and an experiment to reorganize their life plans. Even though they were bearing social recognition struggle and unstable economic condition, they tried to sustain their activities in reflexive struggle to discover authentic meanings of life. Youth activity is chosen as an only strategy of survival for those who dream of sustaining socially-individually meaningful life in today’s Korean society.
Though it has its limits occuring from dealing with ongoing case and using qualitative methods, this study tried to observe a specific type of youth made in specific time and space―youth activity―to overcome social projects that seek to generalize and evaluate this heterogeneous group. Conceptually, youth activity is a hybrid practice to recover lost meanings in economic labor and lost sustainability in political movement. In Seoul city in particular, it is taking place in dilemmatic field of governmentality project of institution and reflexivity project of subject. How can we interpret this dilemmatic way of life that youth activists choose, and how bright is their prospect? This study attempted to open up a space to discuss these new problems of youth in theoretical and practical context.