주요한(朱耀翰) 시문학 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Ju Yo-han's poetic literature can be examined according to the "period of studying in Tokyo, Shanghai period, period of the folk poetry movement, and that of pro-Japanese literature." This study recognized that the first three periods did not have a big interval between them and shared commonalities such as accepting the modern Western poetry and exploring the possibility of creating "creative national literature," thus binding them together as the his former poetic world and re-sorting the period of pro-Japanese literature that began after a ten-year literary break in his life as his latter poetic world. The study then set out to investigate the changing process of his poetry, the consciousness he pursued, the characteristics of his poetic consciousness, the internal and external contexts and continuity with the previous literature in relation to pro-Japanese literature, and the significance in the history of poetry.
Chapter II covered the characteristics of his poetry by the periods and the changing process of consciousness that he pursued until the period of the folk poetry movement, finding that he experimented with and created free verses, seeking after the West and modern times while studying in Tokyo, expressed the national consciousness in the form of free verse and reflected his nostalgia in the form of folk poetry, orienting himself toward his hometown and childhood, during the Shanghai period, and developed the movement of the folk(popular) poetry movement in full scale, reflecting on the Western inclination in the middle 1920s, with the merits and demerits of the folk poetry movement. In addition, the study pointed out that those changes to his poetry were attributed to his experiences with Western literature and the resulting changes to his attitude.
Chapter III looked into the biographic situations and the period context that converted him into a pro-Japanese poet during the period of pro-Japanese literature. The chapter examined the causes behind the Joseon spirit, which he advocated for being Joseon but had limitations as just something out of imagination, and popular orientation, which remained at the ideological level, being transformed or refracted into the Japanese spirit and popular instigation, respectively. It also addressed the internal pro-Japanese logic embodied in his poetic texts and the continuity or connection to the previous literature.
Finally, Chapter IV mentioned his significance in the history of poetry, enumerating his contributions to the formation and development process of modern Korean poetic literature.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 1
• 1. 연구의 목적 1
• 2. 연구사 검토 5
• 3. 연구의 범위와 방법 13
• Ⅱ. 근대성 지향의 전기 시세계 20
• 1. 전기 시세계의 전개와 특성 21
• 1) 민족의식의 형성과 민족문학 지향 21
• 2) 서구문학 체험과 시의식의 영향관계 26
• 2. 서구적 근대 수용과 자유시의 실험 33
• 1) 일역(日譯)된 서구 근대문학의 수용과불노리 33
• 2) 자긔의 발견과 내면의식의 표출 42
• 3. 민족의식의 형상화와 망향(望鄕)의 시 47
• 1) 상해(上海) 활동과독립신문수록 시 47
• 2) 민족의식의 시련과 망향시의 창작 55
• 4. 민요시 운동의 전개와 민중지향 64
• 1) 새로운 곡조의 모색과 조선혼의 주창(主唱) 65
• 2) 민요시 추구의 의미와 관념성 74
• Ⅲ. 일본정신 수용의 후기 시세계 89
• 1. 문학적 방향전환의 요인과 의미 91
• 2. 마쓰무라 고이치(松村紘一)와 팔굉일우(八紘一宇) 99
• 3. 상상된 조선혼의 굴절과 아시아 민족주의 109
• 4. 군국주의 동조와 전쟁동원을 위한 민중선동 118
• Ⅳ. 시사적 의의와 한계 127
• Ⅴ. 결론 133
• 참고문헌 138
• ABSTRACT 143