RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    集合建物의 區分所有權에 관한 硏究 = A Study on the divided ownership of the collective building

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T135608

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      광주: 朝鮮大學校, 1986. -

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 朝鮮大學校 大學院 , 法學科(私法) , 1986

    • 발행연도

      1986

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      346.043

    • 발행국(도시)

      전라남도

    • 형태사항

      144p.; 26cm

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 동국대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 동신대학교 학술문화정보원 소장기관정보
      • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 동의대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 명지대학교 자연캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 부산대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 숭실대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 인하대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전남대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전주대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 제주대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 조선대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 충북대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한국학중앙연구원 한국학도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 호남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper attemptes to study on the divided ownership of the collective building.
    The demand for housing has been increased greatly by concentrating Population on cities followed by urbanization and industrialization since the 1960's in Korea. As a result, the collective building such as apartment building has been made to solve this problem and possessed according to the forms of the divided ownership by owners.
    But different from the absolute ownership, the divided ownership is an exemplary exception to the law of one right for one asset, and has peculiar legal characteristics in relation to integrity and collective usage.
    In foreign advanced countries, special acts have been legislated or civil code has been reinforced to cope with the legal problems in the divided ownership.
    In korea, the article 215 of civil code has regulated the divided ownership of a building. Due to the substantial increase of collective buildings nowadays, however, this article seems to become inadequate to deal with the various kinds of current and potential problems which are concerned with the divided ownership, As a result, the Law of the Ownership and Management for Collective Building was enacted on April 10, 1984, This law consists of 66 articles, which has been effective since April 10, 1985. However, this law is, in fact, founded on the Japanese Law related to the divided ownership of collective building, which was enacted in 1962 and revised in 1983, In this respect, the law may not be fit to the problems in our society.
    The contents of the study for reguirements above are as follows;
    Chapter Ⅰ. Introduction
    The arising of the problems, the purpose of the study, the method of the study, and the scopes of the study are described in introduction
    Chapter Ⅱ. The basis on legal theory of the right of divided ownership
    Here is defined and characterized the right of divided ownership.
    Chapter Ⅲ. Some examples on the legislative act in the foreign countries including in west Germany, France, the United States of America, and Japan : to analyse the legal system in Korea, the survey of foreign legal system is researched by comparative laws.
    Chapter Ⅵ. The legal status of divided owner Rights and duties of an owner of the divided pants of the collectine building are explained in this place.
    Chapter Ⅴ. The management of the collective building
    The machinery of administration, and reconstruction or repair of the collective building are explained in this place.
    Chapter Ⅶ. The public theory of the collective building on the registration of the collective building and its site.
    Chapter Ⅷ. Conclusion
    The problems and proposals in the present divided ownership of the collective building are suggested in conclusion;
    Problems in the present divided ownership of the collective building can be pointed out as follows;
    1. Problems in the definition and category of exclusive possession part and the common utilizing part of this law.
    2. Problems in rightd the duties of an owner of the collective building.
    3. Problems in the registration of the divided ownership
    4. Problems in the adaptation of the appropriate law in our society.
    Proposals for the establishment of reasonable legal system in korea are as follows;
    1. The definition and category of the exclusive possession part and the common utilizing part of the collective building should be provided precisely.
    2. The rights and duties of the co-owners of the collective building should be provided in detail.
    3. The system of the management ownership in the registration of the divided ownership of a building should be adapted.
    4. The law of the ownership and management of the collective building should be revised and dapted to the individual characteristics of collective building.
    In short it is necessary to develop the basic formations for the law of the divided ownership, which will be appropriate to rule in our social problems.
    번역하기

    This paper attemptes to study on the divided ownership of the collective building. The demand for housing has been increased greatly by concentrating Population on cities followed by urbanization and industrialization since the 1960's in Korea. As a ...

    This paper attemptes to study on the divided ownership of the collective building.
    The demand for housing has been increased greatly by concentrating Population on cities followed by urbanization and industrialization since the 1960's in Korea. As a result, the collective building such as apartment building has been made to solve this problem and possessed according to the forms of the divided ownership by owners.
    But different from the absolute ownership, the divided ownership is an exemplary exception to the law of one right for one asset, and has peculiar legal characteristics in relation to integrity and collective usage.
    In foreign advanced countries, special acts have been legislated or civil code has been reinforced to cope with the legal problems in the divided ownership.
    In korea, the article 215 of civil code has regulated the divided ownership of a building. Due to the substantial increase of collective buildings nowadays, however, this article seems to become inadequate to deal with the various kinds of current and potential problems which are concerned with the divided ownership, As a result, the Law of the Ownership and Management for Collective Building was enacted on April 10, 1984, This law consists of 66 articles, which has been effective since April 10, 1985. However, this law is, in fact, founded on the Japanese Law related to the divided ownership of collective building, which was enacted in 1962 and revised in 1983, In this respect, the law may not be fit to the problems in our society.
    The contents of the study for reguirements above are as follows;
    Chapter Ⅰ. Introduction
    The arising of the problems, the purpose of the study, the method of the study, and the scopes of the study are described in introduction
    Chapter Ⅱ. The basis on legal theory of the right of divided ownership
    Here is defined and characterized the right of divided ownership.
    Chapter Ⅲ. Some examples on the legislative act in the foreign countries including in west Germany, France, the United States of America, and Japan : to analyse the legal system in Korea, the survey of foreign legal system is researched by comparative laws.
    Chapter Ⅵ. The legal status of divided owner Rights and duties of an owner of the divided pants of the collectine building are explained in this place.
    Chapter Ⅴ. The management of the collective building
    The machinery of administration, and reconstruction or repair of the collective building are explained in this place.
    Chapter Ⅶ. The public theory of the collective building on the registration of the collective building and its site.
    Chapter Ⅷ. Conclusion
    The problems and proposals in the present divided ownership of the collective building are suggested in conclusion;
    Problems in the present divided ownership of the collective building can be pointed out as follows;
    1. Problems in the definition and category of exclusive possession part and the common utilizing part of this law.
    2. Problems in rightd the duties of an owner of the collective building.
    3. Problems in the registration of the divided ownership
    4. Problems in the adaptation of the appropriate law in our society.
    Proposals for the establishment of reasonable legal system in korea are as follows;
    1. The definition and category of the exclusive possession part and the common utilizing part of the collective building should be provided precisely.
    2. The rights and duties of the co-owners of the collective building should be provided in detail.
    3. The system of the management ownership in the registration of the divided ownership of a building should be adapted.
    4. The law of the ownership and management of the collective building should be revised and dapted to the individual characteristics of collective building.
    In short it is necessary to develop the basic formations for the law of the divided ownership, which will be appropriate to rule in our social problems.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = 4
    • 第一章 序論 = 7
    • 第一節 問題의 提起 = 7
    • 第二節 硏究의 目的 = 7
    • 第三節 硏究의 範圍 = 8
    • 목차 = 4
    • 第一章 序論 = 7
    • 第一節 問題의 提起 = 7
    • 第二節 硏究의 目的 = 7
    • 第三節 硏究의 範圍 = 8
    • 第二章 區分所有權의 法理的 基礎 = 10
    • 第三章 主要各國의 立法狀況 = 12
    • 第一節 一般的 動向 = 12
    • 第二節 各國의 立法動向 = 12
    • 1. 프랑스 = 12
    • 2. 西獨 = 15
    • 3. 美國 = 22
    • 4. 日本 = 24
    • 第三節 各國立法의 比較的 檢討 = 28
    • 第四章 集合建物法의 成立과 그 構造 = 33
    • 第一節 集合建物法의 成立 = 33
    • 1. 立法的 背景 = 33
    • 2. 法制定의 經緯 = 34
    • 第二節 集合建物의 形態的 分析 = 37
    • 1. 區分所有의 對象 = 37
    • 2. 區分所有權의 客體 = 39
    • 第三節 分所有權의 變動理論 = 45
    • 1. 區分所有權의 成立 = 45
    • 2. 區分所有權의 消滅 = 50
    • 第四節 垈地使用權 = 52
    • 1. 序言 = 52
    • 2. 垈地使用權의 法的性格 = 57
    • 3. 一體性理論의 分析 = 61
    • 第5章 區分所有者의 法的地位 = 70
    • 第一節 集合建物에 대한 法的關係 = 70
    • 第二節 構成員으로서의 法的 關係 = 78
    • 第六章 集合建物法의 管理的 側面 = 82
    • 第1節 序言 = 82
    • 第2節 現行 管理制度의 檢討 = 83
    • 第三節 管理團 = 85
    • 1. 法的 性格 = 85
    • 2. 管理團의 設立 및 組織 = 86
    • 3. 消滅 = 102
    • 第四節 集合建物의 再建築과 復舊 = 102
    • 1. 序言 = 102
    • 2. 再建築의 法的處理 = 103
    • 3. 復舊의 法的處理 = 109
    • 第七章 集合建物의 公示理論 = 113
    • 第一節 改正不動産登記法의 成立 = 113
    • 1. 沿革 = 113
    • 2. 內容 = 115
    • 第二節 改正不動産登記法의 構造 = 119
    • 1. 建物의 登記 = 119
    • 2. 垈地의 登記 = 122
    • 第八章 結論的 考察 = 129
    • 第一節 集合建物法의 問題點 = 129
    • 第二節 立法論的 方向 = 136
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼