RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    신제도주의적 관점에서 본 한국 재외선거제도의 실효성 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13556028

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to deduce effectiveness by evaluating and analyzing overseas election system. Korean citizens residing foreign countries had been deprived of their political rights, the fundamental right of a citizen, only because they are out of country until 2009 when overseas voting was initiated in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s “Unconformable to「Public Official Election Act」Constitution” decision. In 2012, they exercised their right to vote for the 19th election of members of the National Assembly and the 18th presidential election, for the first time in the constitutional history. Legislation of overseas voting was decision of the judicature, not the National Assembly’s. The new law was enacted, considering concerns of the fairness of the first overseas voting and the uncertainty of election result, based on the fairness of election rather than the convenience of overseas Koreans’ voting.
    However, sole suffrage does not complete the voting right of an overseas Korean. A system shall be established for a voter with voting intention to be able to participate in the election without a trouble. The fairness shall be secured during the election process, and an inexpensive but efficient overseas voting administration system shall be prepared. In addition, the overseas Korean society must be motivated to participate in the overseas voting.
    As the result of the two major elections in 2012, the voting rate of the 19th overseas election of members of the National Assembly turned out to be 2.53% of presumed number of voters while that of the 18th overseas presidential election was 7.08%. Such rates are obviously low, considering keen interest of Korean citizens in politics and strong homeland-orientation of overseas Korean. Inconvenience of overseas voting system that may block overseas Koreans with voting intention from further election shall be avoided. Even though there had been arguments brought up against overseas voting due to high cost election expense and low voting rate after the 19th overseas election of members of the National Assembly, overseas voting is very crucial to national harmony and the development of national politics, gathering together the minds of Korean citizens scattered all over the world. Therefore, there must be efforts made for further overseas voting to settle down more expansively and stably.
    For further overseas voting to be more developmental and stable, the freedom and justice of election shall be well-matched. There shall be no inconvenience in the overseas election system and election administration structure and lack of election information and motivation which will cause political indifference of overseas voters with voting intention. Accordingly, this study proposes an effective reform measure through the institutional․organizational․actor-related factors evaluation and analysis of the results of two major elections in 2012 in the standpoint of new-institutionalism.
    번역하기

    This study aims to deduce effectiveness by evaluating and analyzing overseas election system. Korean citizens residing foreign countries had been deprived of their political rights, the fundamental right of a citizen, only because they are out of coun...

    This study aims to deduce effectiveness by evaluating and analyzing overseas election system. Korean citizens residing foreign countries had been deprived of their political rights, the fundamental right of a citizen, only because they are out of country until 2009 when overseas voting was initiated in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s “Unconformable to「Public Official Election Act」Constitution” decision. In 2012, they exercised their right to vote for the 19th election of members of the National Assembly and the 18th presidential election, for the first time in the constitutional history. Legislation of overseas voting was decision of the judicature, not the National Assembly’s. The new law was enacted, considering concerns of the fairness of the first overseas voting and the uncertainty of election result, based on the fairness of election rather than the convenience of overseas Koreans’ voting.
    However, sole suffrage does not complete the voting right of an overseas Korean. A system shall be established for a voter with voting intention to be able to participate in the election without a trouble. The fairness shall be secured during the election process, and an inexpensive but efficient overseas voting administration system shall be prepared. In addition, the overseas Korean society must be motivated to participate in the overseas voting.
    As the result of the two major elections in 2012, the voting rate of the 19th overseas election of members of the National Assembly turned out to be 2.53% of presumed number of voters while that of the 18th overseas presidential election was 7.08%. Such rates are obviously low, considering keen interest of Korean citizens in politics and strong homeland-orientation of overseas Korean. Inconvenience of overseas voting system that may block overseas Koreans with voting intention from further election shall be avoided. Even though there had been arguments brought up against overseas voting due to high cost election expense and low voting rate after the 19th overseas election of members of the National Assembly, overseas voting is very crucial to national harmony and the development of national politics, gathering together the minds of Korean citizens scattered all over the world. Therefore, there must be efforts made for further overseas voting to settle down more expansively and stably.
    For further overseas voting to be more developmental and stable, the freedom and justice of election shall be well-matched. There shall be no inconvenience in the overseas election system and election administration structure and lack of election information and motivation which will cause political indifference of overseas voters with voting intention. Accordingly, this study proposes an effective reform measure through the institutional․organizational․actor-related factors evaluation and analysis of the results of two major elections in 2012 in the standpoint of new-institutionalism.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구목적 1
    • 2. 연구범위와 방법 6
    • Ⅱ. 재외선거제도와 신제도주의 이론 고찰 10
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구목적 1
    • 2. 연구범위와 방법 6
    • Ⅱ. 재외선거제도와 신제도주의 이론 고찰 10
    • 1. 재외선거제도 개요 10
    • (1) 재외선거제도의 개념정의 10
    • (2) 재외선거제도의 법적근거 11
    • (3) 재외선거의 특성 11
    • 2. 외국의 재외선거제도 13
    • (1) 외국의 재외선거제도 도입배경 13
    • (2) 외국의 재외선거제도 주요내용 16
    • 3. 신제도주의 이론의 고찰 26
    • (1) 신·구제도주의 이론의 비교 26
    • (2) 신제도주의 이론 28
    • 4. 제도분석의 틀 36
    • (1) IAD 분석틀 36
    • (2) 재외선거 분석요소 : 제도, 환경·구조, 행위자 38
    • Ⅲ. 재외선거의 제도적 요인에 대한 실효성분석 43
    • 1. 재외선거제도의 도입 및 입법과정 43
    • (1) 재외선거제도의 도입과정 43
    • (2) 재외선거제도의 입법과정 46
    • 2. 재외선거 적용대상 및 재외선거권자의 범위 48
    • (1) 재외선거 적용대상 48
    • (2) 재외선거권자의 범위 52
    • 3. 재외선거인등록 및 재외선거인명부 55
    • (1) 국외부재자 및 재외선거인 신고·신청방법 55
    • (2) 국외부재자신고인명부 및 재외선거인명부 작성·관리 63
    • 4. 재외선거 투·개표 64
    • (1) 재외선거 투표 64
    • (2) 재외투표 회송 73
    • (3) 재외선거 개표 74
    • 5. 재외선거운동 및 공정성확보 장치 77
    • (1) 재외선거운동 77
    • (2) 재외선거의 공정성확보 장치 80
    • Ⅳ. 재외선거의 환경·구조적 요인에 대한 실태분석 84
    • 1. 재외선거제도의 정책결정 및 입법구조 84
    • (1) 재외선거제도의 정책결정 84
    • (2) 재외선거제도의 입법구조 93
    • 2. 재외선거의 환경구조 97
    • (1) 재외국민 거주분포 97
    • (2) 재외공관 설치현황 99
    • 3. 재외선거관리 조직구조 101
    • (1) 국내 재외선거관리 전담기구 설치·운영 101
    • (2) 국외 재외선거관리위원회 설치·운영 102
    • 4. 재외선거관리 지원·협조체제 104
    • (1) 재외선거관계기관협의회 구성·운영 104
    • (2) 국외 인적네트워크 구성·운영 105
    • (3) 주재국 정부와의 협조체제 구축 107
    • 5. 재외선거관리 구조 108
    • (1) 재외선거관리 기반 조성 108
    • (2) 재외선거관리 비용 118
    • (3) 재외선거인등록 및 투표관리 시스템 119
    • Ⅴ. 재외선거의 행위자집단 요인에 대한 행태분석 124
    • 1. 재외동포사회와 재외선거인집단 124
    • (1) 재외동포사회의 태도 124
    • (2) 재외선거인집단의 규모와 영향력 128
    • 2. 정당 및 후보자의 재외선거운동 129
    • (1) 국내 송출 재외선거운동 129
    • (2) 현지 재외선거운동 131
    • 3. 재외선거관리자 132
    • (1) 중앙선거관리위원회 132
    • (2) 재외공관 132
    • 4. 재외선거 정보제공 및 홍보활동 137
    • (1) 국외설명회 등 대면 안내·홍보 138
    • (2) 언론·인터넷매체 등 이용 홍보 139
    • (3) 인쇄물·시설물 이용 홍보 140
    • (4) 공명선거추진단체 홍보활동 및 토론회 등 개최 141
    • 5. 재외유권자의 투표참여 143
    • (1) 재외국민의 재외선거참여 의향 143
    • (2) 재외유권자 참여현황 144
    • Ⅵ. 재외선거의 안정화를 위한 대안 제시 146
    • 1. 제도적 요인 146
    • (1) 재외선거제도 입법과정의 심의절차 확대 146
    • (2) 적용대상 선거 및 선거권자 범위의 확대 147
    • (3) 재외선거인등록 및 명부작성관리 방법의 개선 150
    • (4) 재외투표 및 개표방법의 개선 156
    • (5) 재외선거운동 및 공정성 규제의 실효적 운영 160
    • 2. 환경·구조적 요인 161
    • (1) 재외선거제도의 정책결정 및 입법구조의 개선 161
    • (2) 재외선거관리 기반조성 완비 164
    • (3) 재외선거관리조직의 상시체제 유지 165
    • (4) 재외선거관리 지원·협조체제 강화 167
    • (5) 고비용 재외선거관리구조의 개선 168
    • 3. 행위자집단 요인 170
    • (1) 재외동포정책 개발 및 민주시민교육 확대 170
    • (2) 정당 및 후보자의 정보수준 제고 171
    • (3) 재외선거홍보의 효과성 제고 172
    • (4) 재외선거인의 투표참여 동기부여 174
    • (5) 재외선거인의 투표참여 편의성 제고 176
    • Ⅶ. 결 론 178
    • 참고문헌 186
    • 부 록 199
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼