RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국어 학습자를 위한 비판적 문식성 교육 방안 연구 : 문학 텍스트를 활용하여

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13542836

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 고려대학교 대학원, 2014

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 고려대학교 대학원 , 국어국문학과 , 2014. 8

      • 발행연도

        2014

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 기타서명

        (A) study on critical literacy education for Korean language learners : based on the use of literature

      • 형태사항

        v, 232 p. ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 최동호
        부록: 1. 전사 표시, 2. 비판적 문식성 수업 후 수정된 강의 일정표
        참고문헌: p. 211-227

      • DOI식별코드
      • 소장기관
        • 고려대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
        • 고려대학교 세종학술정보원 소장기관정보
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The goal of this study is to suggest a definition for critical literacy and, based on its educational values and strategies, to present a set of guidelines for a critical literacy education based on the use of literature texts.
      In this study, I advocated the necessity for a critical literacy education by demonstrating its value through its application Korean for academic purpose foreign students language class. The subjects of this study has been chosen among undergraduate foreign students because their language education is often based on language skills, while the sociocultural context is often less considered. Thus, in this study I first defined critical literacy and then I revised a model for critical literacy that suit the needs of Korean language education. The revised model has been applied to a Korean language critical literacy classroom of 15 foreign undergraduate students.
      I collected students’ essays assignment and registered classroom discussions, I conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews, and I kept a teacher’s journal. By analyzing this material I searched for developments in students’ critical literacy. Results of this analysis are as follow. First, students’ attention switched with time from gathering and interpreting information to the analysis, evaluation and critics of practice. In particular, they began to reflect on their own academic practice. Secondly, students began to understand the importance of class objectives and purposes of a text. Third, it was possible to observe a better understanding of the sociocultural context of texts through the acknowledgement of the identity of people from other cultures. Fourth, students recognized that what can be criticized is not only the content, but the language as well. In this teaching context, the teacher participates in the classroom by exchanges with students, and his/her role is of assistance, helping students to extent their critical thinking to their academic life.
      I defined the guidelines for a critical literacy education with the content from real classroom experience and these are divided into guidelines for a critical practice and in guidelines for discussions about intercultural practice.
      This study is important for three aspects. First, it is the first study analyzing critical literacy education in Korean language teaching. Classes was successful because students were able to understand not only the language, but the sociocultural context too, and they also understood the importance of a practice focused on intercultural comprehension. Third, this study shows how literature can be effective in the teaching of critical literacy.
      Literacy, whom importance is stressed in foreign language education, and moreover critical literacy, expands the subject of the interpretation to the society and it is important because let the students understand it critically. In the future, critical literacy education should be applied to students with different learning purposes.
      번역하기

      The goal of this study is to suggest a definition for critical literacy and, based on its educational values and strategies, to present a set of guidelines for a critical literacy education based on the use of literature texts. In this study, I advo...

      The goal of this study is to suggest a definition for critical literacy and, based on its educational values and strategies, to present a set of guidelines for a critical literacy education based on the use of literature texts.
      In this study, I advocated the necessity for a critical literacy education by demonstrating its value through its application Korean for academic purpose foreign students language class. The subjects of this study has been chosen among undergraduate foreign students because their language education is often based on language skills, while the sociocultural context is often less considered. Thus, in this study I first defined critical literacy and then I revised a model for critical literacy that suit the needs of Korean language education. The revised model has been applied to a Korean language critical literacy classroom of 15 foreign undergraduate students.
      I collected students’ essays assignment and registered classroom discussions, I conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews, and I kept a teacher’s journal. By analyzing this material I searched for developments in students’ critical literacy. Results of this analysis are as follow. First, students’ attention switched with time from gathering and interpreting information to the analysis, evaluation and critics of practice. In particular, they began to reflect on their own academic practice. Secondly, students began to understand the importance of class objectives and purposes of a text. Third, it was possible to observe a better understanding of the sociocultural context of texts through the acknowledgement of the identity of people from other cultures. Fourth, students recognized that what can be criticized is not only the content, but the language as well. In this teaching context, the teacher participates in the classroom by exchanges with students, and his/her role is of assistance, helping students to extent their critical thinking to their academic life.
      I defined the guidelines for a critical literacy education with the content from real classroom experience and these are divided into guidelines for a critical practice and in guidelines for discussions about intercultural practice.
      This study is important for three aspects. First, it is the first study analyzing critical literacy education in Korean language teaching. Classes was successful because students were able to understand not only the language, but the sociocultural context too, and they also understood the importance of a practice focused on intercultural comprehension. Third, this study shows how literature can be effective in the teaching of critical literacy.
      Literacy, whom importance is stressed in foreign language education, and moreover critical literacy, expands the subject of the interpretation to the society and it is important because let the students understand it critically. In the future, critical literacy education should be applied to students with different learning purposes.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목 차
      • 1. 서론 1
      • 1.1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 1.2. 선행 연구 검토 6
      • 목 차
      • 1. 서론 1
      • 1.1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 1.2. 선행 연구 검토 6
      • 1.3. 연구 방법 및 범위 16
      • 2. 비판적 문식성의 개념과 교육적 효용 20
      • 2.1. 비판적 문식성의 개념 20
      • 2.1.1. 문식성 개념의 변화 20
      • 2.1.2. 비판적 문식성의 출현 배경 26
      • 2.1.3. 비판적 문식성의 개념 29
      • 2.2. 비판적 문식성 개념의 재조명 39
      • 2.3. 비판적 문식성의 교육적 효용 46
      • 2.3.1. 사회 이해 차원 47
      • 2.3.2. 자아 이해 차원 50
      • 2.3.3. 비판적 실천 차원 53
      • 3. 학문 목적 한국어 교육과 비판적 문식성 57
      • 3.1. 학문 목적 한국어 교육 현황 57
      • 3.1.1. 학부 내 학문 목적 한국어 수업 현황 57
      • 3.1.2. 학부 내 학문 목적 한국어 교재 분석 62
      • 3.1.3. 학문 목적 한국어 교육 내 비판적 문식성의 위치 77
      • 3.2. 한국어 학습자를 위한 비판적 문식성 교육의 적용 81
      • 3.2.1. 한국어 교육에서의 비판적 문식성 교육 수정 모델 81
      • 3.2.2. 한국어 교육에서의 비판적 문식성 교육 전략 90
      • 4. 문학 텍스트를 활용한 비판적 문식성 수업 설계 및 실제 100
      • 4.1. 수업 설계 100
      • 4.1.1. 수업의 목표 및 일정 100
      • 4.1.2. 학습자와 연구자 정보 103
      • 4.1.3. 문학 텍스트 선정 105
      • 4.1.4. 수업 단계 109
      • 4.2. 담화 분석 자료 113
      • 4.2.1. 교사의 수업 일지 113
      • 4.2.2. 학습자의 작문 114
      • 4.2.3. 토론 수업 녹음 자료 114
      • 4.2.4. 반구조화된 인터뷰 117
      • 4.2.5. 포커스 그룹 인터뷰 119
      • 4.3. 담화 분석의 실제 120
      • 4.3.1. 부호 실천 123
      • 4.3.2. 텍스트 의미 실천 126
      • 4.3.3. 화용적 실천 136
      • 4.3.4. 비판적 실천 141
      • 4.4. 결과 및 논의 164
      • 5. 문학 텍스트를 활용한 비판적 문식성 교육 방안 173
      • 5.1. 교육 대상 및 목표 173
      • 5.2. 문학 텍스트 선정 기준 175
      • 5.3. 비판적 문식성 교수 단계와 교육 방안 179
      • 5.3.1. 비판적 실천을 위한 질문 방안 182
      • 5.3.2. 상호문화적 실천을 위한 대화적 토론 방안 190
      • 5.4. 비판적 문식성 수업의 예시 194
      • 6. 결론 206
      • 참고문헌 211
      • <부록 1> 전사 표시 229
      • <부록 2> 비판적 문식성 수업 후 수정된 강의 일정표 230
      • ABSTRACT 231
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼