RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    사회복지사의 조직몰입에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 : 사회복지 이용시설과 생활시설의 차이를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13444322

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대전 : 忠南大學校 行政大學院, 2014

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2014

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      360 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      대전

    • 기타서명

      Study on the Factors Affecting Organizational Commitment of Social Workers : Focusing on the Differences Between the Living Facilities and the Facilities for Use

    • 형태사항

      76 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수: 오정수
      부록: 설문지
      참고문헌 : p. 60-64

    • 소장기관
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study is located in social welfare facilities separated by welfare facilities and living facilities in Daejeon to investigate the impact of Job factors, organizational factors, organizational atmosphere factors and job satisfaction factors on organizational commitment of social workers. Through this we presented the implications of social workers' organizational commitment on theoretical and practical levels.
    For the purpose of conducting the research we distributed 233 questionnaires to social workers in the welfare facilities and 133 questionnaires to workers in the living facilities and we analyzed 365 pieces of data in the end. The data analysis was conducted by using factor analysis, t-test, ANOVA, correlations analysis, and the multiple regression analysis.
    The results of the study were as follows :
    Firstly, the average level of social workers' organizational commitment in welfare facilities and living facilities were 3.72, 3.82 respectively and were both slightly higher than the median (3). Secondly, as a result of inspecting differences in organizational commitment from sociological variables, we could only see significant differences in gender and age for workers in living facilities.
    Thirdly, from the regression analysis of factoral influences on organizational commitment, relatively influential job factors in the welfare facilities were found to be job autonomy, task significance, feedback and in the living facilities were job autonomy and task significance. Influential factors for organizational atmosphere for both welfare and living facilities were cooperative atmosphere and achievement atmosphere. Leadership factors for welfare and living facilities were transformational leadership rather than transactional leadership. Amongst influential job satisfaction factors on organizational commitment were promotion, supervisor, overall job satisfaction for welfare facilities and colleagues, supervisor and overall job satisfaction for living facilities.
    Fourthly, results of multiple regression analysis of differences in influencing factors on social workers' organizational commitment separated by social work facilities showed that in welfare facilities task significance, promotion and cooperative atmosphere were most influential. On the other side, in the living facilities, boss satisfaction had the biggest influence, then followed by job autonomy and task significance.
    When you focus on the theoretical implications of organizational commitment based on the above results, research has expanded according to differences in forms of social welfare facilities, organizational factors, organizational atmosphere factors, leadership factors, job satisfaction factors were identified as multifaceted and integrated.
    The main practical implications of the current research were that in order to strengthen organizational commitment of members of social welfare facilities the factors of task significance, cooperativeness and achivement-orientated organizational atmosphere which can make workers feel the importance of their job, needed to be strongly formed. Furthermore, promotion and maintenance systems needs to be developed through a fair assessment of job details, and finally in living facilities consideration of one's superiors as part of work conduct is more important than anything.
    번역하기

    This study is located in social welfare facilities separated by welfare facilities and living facilities in Daejeon to investigate the impact of Job factors, organizational factors, organizational atmosphere factors and job satisfaction factors on org...

    This study is located in social welfare facilities separated by welfare facilities and living facilities in Daejeon to investigate the impact of Job factors, organizational factors, organizational atmosphere factors and job satisfaction factors on organizational commitment of social workers. Through this we presented the implications of social workers' organizational commitment on theoretical and practical levels.
    For the purpose of conducting the research we distributed 233 questionnaires to social workers in the welfare facilities and 133 questionnaires to workers in the living facilities and we analyzed 365 pieces of data in the end. The data analysis was conducted by using factor analysis, t-test, ANOVA, correlations analysis, and the multiple regression analysis.
    The results of the study were as follows :
    Firstly, the average level of social workers' organizational commitment in welfare facilities and living facilities were 3.72, 3.82 respectively and were both slightly higher than the median (3). Secondly, as a result of inspecting differences in organizational commitment from sociological variables, we could only see significant differences in gender and age for workers in living facilities.
    Thirdly, from the regression analysis of factoral influences on organizational commitment, relatively influential job factors in the welfare facilities were found to be job autonomy, task significance, feedback and in the living facilities were job autonomy and task significance. Influential factors for organizational atmosphere for both welfare and living facilities were cooperative atmosphere and achievement atmosphere. Leadership factors for welfare and living facilities were transformational leadership rather than transactional leadership. Amongst influential job satisfaction factors on organizational commitment were promotion, supervisor, overall job satisfaction for welfare facilities and colleagues, supervisor and overall job satisfaction for living facilities.
    Fourthly, results of multiple regression analysis of differences in influencing factors on social workers' organizational commitment separated by social work facilities showed that in welfare facilities task significance, promotion and cooperative atmosphere were most influential. On the other side, in the living facilities, boss satisfaction had the biggest influence, then followed by job autonomy and task significance.
    When you focus on the theoretical implications of organizational commitment based on the above results, research has expanded according to differences in forms of social welfare facilities, organizational factors, organizational atmosphere factors, leadership factors, job satisfaction factors were identified as multifaceted and integrated.
    The main practical implications of the current research were that in order to strengthen organizational commitment of members of social welfare facilities the factors of task significance, cooperativeness and achivement-orientated organizational atmosphere which can make workers feel the importance of their job, needed to be strongly formed. Furthermore, promotion and maintenance systems needs to be developed through a fair assessment of job details, and finally in living facilities consideration of one's superiors as part of work conduct is more important than anything.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 1
    • 제1절 문제제기 1
    • 제2절 연구문제 6
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 7
    • 제1절 개념의 정의 7
    • 제1장 서론 1
    • 제1절 문제제기 1
    • 제2절 연구문제 6
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 7
    • 제1절 개념의 정의 7
    • 1. 조직몰입 7
    • 2. 직무 13
    • 3. 조직분위기 14
    • 4. 리더십 14
    • 5. 직무만족 16
    • 6. 사회복지 생활시설과 이용시설 18
    • 제2절 조직몰입에 영향을 미치는 요인 20
    • 1. 인구사회학적 요인 22
    • 2. 직무 요인 24
    • 3. 조직분위기 요인 24
    • 4. 리더십 요인 25
    • 5. 직무만족 요인 26
    • 제3장 연구방법 27
    • 제1절 연구모형 27
    • 제2절 변수의 정의 및 측정 28
    • 1. 종속변수 28
    • 2. 독립변수 29
    • 3. 통제변수 32
    • 제3절 자료수집 및 분석방법 32
    • 1. 자료수집 32
    • 2. 분석방법 33
    • 제4장 연구분석결과 34
    • 제1절 조사대상자의 일반적 특성과 조직몰입 수준 34
    • 1. 조사대상자의 일반적 특성 34
    • 2. 조직몰입 수준 37
    • 제2절 사회복지시설 형태에 따른 사회복지사의 조직몰입 분석 38
    • 1. 인구사회학적 요인과 조직몰입 수준의 차이 38
    • 2. 직무 요인과 조직몰입 수준의 상관관계 41
    • 3. 조직분위기 요인과 조직몰입 수준의 상관관계 41
    • 4. 리더십 요인과 조직몰입 수준의 상관관계 42
    • 5. 직무만족 요인과 조직몰입 수준의 상관관계 43
    • 제3절 사회복지사의 조직몰입에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 44
    • 1. 다중공선성 검토 44
    • 2. 사회복지사의 조직몰입에 영향을 미치는 결정요인 47
    • 제5장 결론 55
    • 제1절 분석결과의 요약 55
    • 제2절 연구의 함의 및 한계 57
    • 참고문헌 60
    • 부록: 설문지 65
    • ABSTRACT 73
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼