한국 성 주류화의 틀짜기에 대한 분석 : 성별영향분석평가와 성인지예산을 초점으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis analyses framing of Gender Mainstreaming(GM) in Korea, taking as a conceptional framework four framing components of GM: Political Opportunities, Policy Actors, Policy Contents, Gender-Mainstreaming Learning.
The study of Gender Impact Assessment(GIA) and Gender Responsive Budget(GRB) offers significant opportunity for exploring how gender has been mainstreamed in Korea government. So I studied GIA and GRB as two cases to examine framing of GM in Korea, observing GIA practice of local government “A” in 2008, interviewing 37 people (related GIA or GRB including local government “A”, “B”) in 2011 or 2012, and analysing the 2008 GIA final reports and the 2011 Gender Budgeting.
I found the framing of GM had ‘institutionalised approach’ as a peculiarity in Korea. Especially in the institutions South Korea focused on how governments to adjust for GM more than what issues to change for GM. In terms of Political Opportunities GM agenda entered government mainstream and has been institutionalised. But government officials for GIA practice tried to select as target policies businesses whose the objects divided into women and men, except for a specified businesses related female only. Also government officials in GRB institution created Gender Budgeting on detailed business units, keeping step with mainstream budget system(Program budget system). Thus structural issues related gender inequality can be questions hard to solve in both the institutions. In the result, I can say the framing of GM in Korea respects the conventional report preparation, not substantial GM. So far, I propose the framing of GM in Korea as a huge Gender-Mainstreaming Learning, because government officials have mainly created GIA report and Gender Budgeting in many years.
This Thesis has a theoretical implication in materializing concept of GM, conceptualizing GM not as a strategy but as a process. And the framing components of GM also has meaning analytically to policy research related GM, so they can contribute theoretically. In government policy area, I emphasize the need for structural effort for GM. Particularly governments had better consider the roles and mutual strategy of framing components of GM as the structural effort for GM.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 1
• Ⅱ. 이론 검토: 성 주류화의 틀짜기(framing) 5
• 1. 성 주류화의 개념 5
• 1) 성 주류화란? 5
• 2) 젠더와 주류 간의 문제 7
• 2. 성 주류화의 틀짜기 13
• 1) 틀짜기 논의 13
• 2) 성 주류화의 틀짜기에 관한 기존 논쟁 14
• 3. 성 주류화의 틀짜기 구성 요소 19
• Ⅲ. 연구 설계 26
• 1. 사례연구방법 26
• 2. 연구의 대상 29
• 3. 연구조사의 일정 및 연구윤리 32
• Ⅳ. 한국 성 주류화에 대한 이해 37
• 1. 성 주류화 관련 정책의 현황 37
• 2. 한국 성 주류화 관련 제도화 연혁 40
• Ⅴ. 성별영향분석평가 46
• 1. 정치적 기회: 정권의 변화와 지방분권화의 영향 46
• 2. 정책 행위자: 젠더 전문가의 협력에 의한 공무원 중심 54
• 3. 정책 내용: 성별이 드러나는 정책 중심 66
• 4. 성 주류화 학습: 성별영향분석평가보고서 작성 컨설팅 위주 76
• Ⅵ. 성인지예산 85
• 1. 정치적 기회: 성인지예산운동과 국회청원 85
• 2. 정책 행위자: 여성단체 활동가에서 공무원 중심으로 변화 94
• 3. 정책 내용: 기능적 예산체계의 세부사업 단위 110
• 4. 성 주류화 학습: 성인지예산서 작성을 위한 실무교육 위주 119
• Ⅶ. 결론 및 정책적 함의 127
• 참고문헌 138
• ABSTRACT 160