RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    유방암 환자의 회복탄력성과 외상후 스트레스장애가 삶의 질에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13372405

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: The purpose of this study is to grasp
    relationships of resilience, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD), and quality of life of breast cancer patients, and provide baseline data needed for nursing intervention that can enhance breast cancer patients’ quality of life by improving resilience and lowering PTSD.
    Methods: Data collection period was August 16-October 16, 2013, and after gaining approval of Institutional Review Board of S University Hospital(2013-SCMC-32-00), it
    targeted 129 breast cancer patients who had visited department of internal medicine, department of surgery, or department of rehabilitation medicine in S University Hospital or two Women's Hospitals located in C City, Gyeongsangnam-do. The patients were notified of the necessity and purpose of this study, benefits, data collection methods, time required, and secret security, and it was fully explained to the subjects that they could participate in this study, or stop or deny it according to their own decisions. And then only those who understood the purpose of this study and agreed on their voluntary participations were selected as subjects. Written consents were received from the subjects, and data was collected by distributing structuralized questionnaires to them.

    For research tools, a tool that Yangsuk Song(2004) translated and modified Resilience Scale developed by Wagnild & Young(1993), Impact of Event Scale-Revised Korean Version that Hunjung Eun et al. (2005) standardized Impact of Event Scale-Revised(IES-R) produced by Weiss & Marmar(1997), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Version 4(FACT-B, Korean Version) developed by Brady, et al. (1997) were used after gaining approval.
    The collected data was analyzed through frequency, percentage, average and standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA, Duncan multiple range test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Multiple Stepweiss regression, by using the PASW 18.0 window program.

    The study results can be summarized as below.

    1) The resilience average score of the subjects was 89.27±14.95(range 25~125).
    2) The PTSD average score of the subjects was 29.25±17.52(range 0~88). Here, 53.5% of the subjects was included in the PTSD high-risk group and 16.3% was in the PTSD risk group, indicating that 69.8% of the subjects had PTSD higher than a risk level.
    3) The quality of life average score of the subjects was 93.34±19.34(range 0~148). For the average scores of sub-areas of quality of life, breast cancer area was 22.55±5.06(range 0~40), body area 19.51±6.51(range 0~28), function area 18.39±6.02(range 0~28), society/family area 16.61±6.18(range 0~28), and emotion area 16.27±4.69(range 0~24).
    4) Resilience according to general characteristics of the subjects showed statistically significant differences on age(F=5.848, p=.017) and job(F=4.219, p=.042). PTSD according to general characteristics of the subjects showed statistically significant differences on age(F=5.240, p=.024). Quality of life according to general characteristics of the subjects showed statistically significant differences on religion(t=2.114, p=.033) and hobby(t=2.790, p=.006).
    5) Resilience, PTSD, and quality of life according to disease-related characteristics of the subjects showed no significant difference.
    6) Resilience and quality of life of the subjects had a positive correlation(r=.588, p<.001), and resilience and PTSD had a negative correlation(r=-.225, p=.010). PTSD and quality of life had a negative correlation(r=-.459, p<.001).
    7) A factor that had a biggest effect on quality of life of the subjects turned out to be resilience. For the influence of resilience and PTSD on quality of life, resilience regression coefficient β=.511 and PTSD regression coefficient β=-.344, and explanatory power of resilience and PTSD on quality of life was 44.9%.

    Conclusion: As above, it turned out that as resilience of breast cancer patients was higher and PTSD was lower, quality of life increased. Thus, based on this result, a study to develop and apply nursing intervention programs to improve resilience and relieve PTSD is proposed. And a long-term longitudinal study to examine factors related to changes of PTSD and quality of life of breast cancer patients depending on time elapsing is proposed.
    Keywords: Resilience, Breast cancer patients, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD), Quality of life
    번역하기

    Purpose: The purpose of this study is to grasp relationships of resilience, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD), and quality of life of breast cancer patients, and provide baseline data needed for nursing intervention that can enhance breast cancer p...

    Purpose: The purpose of this study is to grasp
    relationships of resilience, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD), and quality of life of breast cancer patients, and provide baseline data needed for nursing intervention that can enhance breast cancer patients’ quality of life by improving resilience and lowering PTSD.
    Methods: Data collection period was August 16-October 16, 2013, and after gaining approval of Institutional Review Board of S University Hospital(2013-SCMC-32-00), it
    targeted 129 breast cancer patients who had visited department of internal medicine, department of surgery, or department of rehabilitation medicine in S University Hospital or two Women's Hospitals located in C City, Gyeongsangnam-do. The patients were notified of the necessity and purpose of this study, benefits, data collection methods, time required, and secret security, and it was fully explained to the subjects that they could participate in this study, or stop or deny it according to their own decisions. And then only those who understood the purpose of this study and agreed on their voluntary participations were selected as subjects. Written consents were received from the subjects, and data was collected by distributing structuralized questionnaires to them.

    For research tools, a tool that Yangsuk Song(2004) translated and modified Resilience Scale developed by Wagnild & Young(1993), Impact of Event Scale-Revised Korean Version that Hunjung Eun et al. (2005) standardized Impact of Event Scale-Revised(IES-R) produced by Weiss & Marmar(1997), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Version 4(FACT-B, Korean Version) developed by Brady, et al. (1997) were used after gaining approval.
    The collected data was analyzed through frequency, percentage, average and standard deviation, t-test, ANOVA, Duncan multiple range test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Multiple Stepweiss regression, by using the PASW 18.0 window program.

    The study results can be summarized as below.

    1) The resilience average score of the subjects was 89.27±14.95(range 25~125).
    2) The PTSD average score of the subjects was 29.25±17.52(range 0~88). Here, 53.5% of the subjects was included in the PTSD high-risk group and 16.3% was in the PTSD risk group, indicating that 69.8% of the subjects had PTSD higher than a risk level.
    3) The quality of life average score of the subjects was 93.34±19.34(range 0~148). For the average scores of sub-areas of quality of life, breast cancer area was 22.55±5.06(range 0~40), body area 19.51±6.51(range 0~28), function area 18.39±6.02(range 0~28), society/family area 16.61±6.18(range 0~28), and emotion area 16.27±4.69(range 0~24).
    4) Resilience according to general characteristics of the subjects showed statistically significant differences on age(F=5.848, p=.017) and job(F=4.219, p=.042). PTSD according to general characteristics of the subjects showed statistically significant differences on age(F=5.240, p=.024). Quality of life according to general characteristics of the subjects showed statistically significant differences on religion(t=2.114, p=.033) and hobby(t=2.790, p=.006).
    5) Resilience, PTSD, and quality of life according to disease-related characteristics of the subjects showed no significant difference.
    6) Resilience and quality of life of the subjects had a positive correlation(r=.588, p<.001), and resilience and PTSD had a negative correlation(r=-.225, p=.010). PTSD and quality of life had a negative correlation(r=-.459, p<.001).
    7) A factor that had a biggest effect on quality of life of the subjects turned out to be resilience. For the influence of resilience and PTSD on quality of life, resilience regression coefficient β=.511 and PTSD regression coefficient β=-.344, and explanatory power of resilience and PTSD on quality of life was 44.9%.

    Conclusion: As above, it turned out that as resilience of breast cancer patients was higher and PTSD was lower, quality of life increased. Thus, based on this result, a study to develop and apply nursing intervention programs to improve resilience and relieve PTSD is proposed. And a long-term longitudinal study to examine factors related to changes of PTSD and quality of life of breast cancer patients depending on time elapsing is proposed.
    Keywords: Resilience, Breast cancer patients, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder(PTSD), Quality of life

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목 차
    • I. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 목 차
    • I. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 3
    • 3. 용어의 정의 4
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 5
    • Ⅱ. 문헌고찰 6
    • 1. 유방암 환자의 삶의 질 6
    • 2. 유방암 환자의 회복탄력성 10
    • 3. 유방암 환자의 외상후 스트레스장애 15
    • 4. 유방암 환자의 회복탄력성과 외상후 스트레스장애가 삶의 질에 미치는 영향
    • 20
    • Ⅲ.연구방법 25
    • 1. 연구 설계 25
    • 2. 연구 대상 25
    • 3. 연구 도구 26
    • 4. 연구의 윤리적인 측면 27
    • 5. 자료수집 방법 28
    • 6. 자료 분석 29
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 30
    • 1. 대상자의 일반적 특성 및 질병관련 특성 30
    • 2. 대상자의 회복탄력성, 외상후 스트레스장애, 삶의 질 34
    • 1) 대상자의 회복탄력성 34
    • 2) 대상자의 외상후 스트레스장애 34
    • 3) 대상자의 삶의 질 35
    • 3. 대상자의 일반적 특성에 따른 회복탄력성, 외상후 스트레스장애 및 삶의 질
    • 36
    • 4. 대상자의 질병관련 특성에 따른 회복탄력성, 외상후 스트레스장애 및 삶의 질
    • 40
    • 5. 대상자의 회복탄력성, 외상후 스트레스장애 및 삶의 질과의 관계 43
    • 6. 대상자의 회복탄력성, 외상후 스트레스장애가 삶의 질에 미치는 영향 44
    • Ⅴ. 논의 45
    • 1. 대상자의 회복탄력성, 외상후 스트레스장애 및 삶의 질과의 관계 45
    • 2. 대상자의 회복탄력성, 외상후 스트레스장애가 삶의 질에 미치는 영향 51
    • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 53
    • 1. 결론 53
    • 2. 제언 55
    • 참고문헌 56
    • 부록 68
    • 부록-1. 연구자 참여 동의서 68
    • 부록-2. 일반적 특성 및 질병관련 특성 설문지 69
    • 부록-3. 회복탄력성 설문지 70
    • 부록-4. 외상후 스트레스장애 설문지 71
    • 부록-5. 삶의 질 설문지 72
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼