RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    영어의 시간 은유에 대한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13316672

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대전 : 충남대학교 대학원, 2013

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2013

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      420 판사항(22)

    • 발행국(도시)

      대전

    • 형태사항

      ii, 60 p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      충남대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
      지도교수: 백미현
      참고문헌 : p. 56-58

    • 소장기관
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to explore the aspect of conceptualization of time in view of cognitive linguistics.
    The results are summarized as follows: First, the metaphoric aspects of time are mainly characterized by the following four types of conceptual metaphors: TIME IS SPACE, TIME IS RESOURCES/MONEY, TIME IS A PERSON, TIME IS A THING.
    Second, in the TIME IS A THING metaphor, TIME is often regarded as a moving object. Most of the analyses of time so far note that there exists a relative motion between the observer(ego) and time (Lakoff & Johnson 1999). For this reason, sometimes time is conceived as a moving object and the observer(ego) as a stationary object, and vice versa (e.g., "Christmas is approaching.", "We are approaching Christmas.").
    Third, these two systems lead to different assignments of front/back to a time-line. For example, in the Moving Ego system, front is assigned to the future(later) event (e.g., "The war is behind us." or "His whole future is before him."). In the Moving Time system, in contrast, front is assigned to a past(earlier) event (e.g., "I will see you before 4 o'clock." or "The reception after the talk.").
    Lastly, even though Lakoff & Johnson(1999) mentioned a metaphorical system covering the sequencing of events which are not observer-anchored, for instance, in the following/preceding weeks, tomorrow follows today and so forth, the sequencing of events is not focused and not relevantly reflected into the accounts. The sequencing of events is dealt with enough attention by Nunez & Sweetser(2006).
    The characteristic of the sequencing of events metaphor is that there is no requirement of a canonical observer anchored in it's source domain. So in this thesis, two systems of time metaphors are reclassified based on Nunez & Sweetser(2006).
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to explore the aspect of conceptualization of time in view of cognitive linguistics. The results are summarized as follows: First, the metaphoric aspects of time are mainly characterized by the following four types of c...

    The purpose of this study is to explore the aspect of conceptualization of time in view of cognitive linguistics.
    The results are summarized as follows: First, the metaphoric aspects of time are mainly characterized by the following four types of conceptual metaphors: TIME IS SPACE, TIME IS RESOURCES/MONEY, TIME IS A PERSON, TIME IS A THING.
    Second, in the TIME IS A THING metaphor, TIME is often regarded as a moving object. Most of the analyses of time so far note that there exists a relative motion between the observer(ego) and time (Lakoff & Johnson 1999). For this reason, sometimes time is conceived as a moving object and the observer(ego) as a stationary object, and vice versa (e.g., "Christmas is approaching.", "We are approaching Christmas.").
    Third, these two systems lead to different assignments of front/back to a time-line. For example, in the Moving Ego system, front is assigned to the future(later) event (e.g., "The war is behind us." or "His whole future is before him."). In the Moving Time system, in contrast, front is assigned to a past(earlier) event (e.g., "I will see you before 4 o'clock." or "The reception after the talk.").
    Lastly, even though Lakoff & Johnson(1999) mentioned a metaphorical system covering the sequencing of events which are not observer-anchored, for instance, in the following/preceding weeks, tomorrow follows today and so forth, the sequencing of events is not focused and not relevantly reflected into the accounts. The sequencing of events is dealt with enough attention by Nunez & Sweetser(2006).
    The characteristic of the sequencing of events metaphor is that there is no requirement of a canonical observer anchored in it's source domain. So in this thesis, two systems of time metaphors are reclassified based on Nunez & Sweetser(2006).

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 서 론 1
    • 2. 은유를 통한 시간의 개념화 양상 3
    • 2.1 은유의 정의 3
    • 2.2 시간의 개념화 양상 13
    • 2.2.1 [시간은 공간(TIME IS SPACE)] 은유 15
    • 1. 서 론 1
    • 2. 은유를 통한 시간의 개념화 양상 3
    • 2.1 은유의 정의 3
    • 2.2 시간의 개념화 양상 13
    • 2.2.1 [시간은 공간(TIME IS SPACE)] 은유 15
    • 2.2.2 [시간은 자원/돈(TIME IS RESOURCES/MONEY)] 은유 18
    • 2.2.3 [시간은 사람(TIME IS A PERSON)] 은유 23
    • 2.2.4 [시간은 사물(TIME IS A THING)] 은유 26
    • 3. 시간이 사물로 개념화 될 때의 두 가지 시간 은유 27
    • 3.1 움직이는 관찰자 은유 27
    • 3.2 움직이는 시간 은유 30
    • 3.3 시간의 방향성 33
    • 3.3.1 물체의 앞과 뒤의 구분 37
    • 3.3.2 시간의 앞과 뒤의 구분 39
    • 4. Nunez & Sweetser(2006)의 참조점 모형에 의한 시간 은유 설명 42
    • 4.1 시간 은유를 두 가지로 분류하는 방식의 문제점 42
    • 4.2 시간 참조점 은유 45
    • 4.3 관찰자 참조점 은유 48
    • 4.3.1 관찰자 참조점 은유의 정적인 구조 49
    • 4.3.2 관찰자 참조점 은유의 동적인 구조 51
    • 5. 결 론 54
    • 참고문헌 56
    • 영문초록 59
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼