As Korea’s economic growth was originally based on manufacturing, it should rapidly correspond to changes and actively develop cooperation strategies. To secure the competitive advantage of SMEs, the cooperation between S...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13278934
강릉 : 관동대학교, 2013
2013
한국어
324.3 판사항(5)
338.642 판사항(21)
강원특별자치도
ix, 84장 ; 26 cm
권말부록: 설문지
참고문헌: 장 73-80
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
As Korea’s economic growth was originally based on manufacturing, it should rapidly correspond to changes and actively develop cooperation strategies. To secure the competitive advantage of SMEs, the cooperation between S...
As Korea’s economic growth was originally based on manufacturing, it should rapidly correspond to changes and actively develop cooperation strategies. To secure the competitive advantage of SMEs, the cooperation between SMEs is essential as the polarization of wealth between SMEs and conglomerates is deepening. In order to make up for their functional deficiencies, SMEs often aim at joint research and co-development which are extremely difficult for them to carry out alone. In R&D of future- oriented new products and growth products, alliance companies often aim at product development or entering new markets by combining each company’s technologies.
They concentrate their management resources on core capabilities, strengthen their competitiveness while as a measure for survival, SMEs have increased risks actively introduce practical cooperation and alliance strategy towards concrete performances. Thus, at the stage prior to strategic alliance, they should have a clear aim of participation and a solid intent of cooperation by their chief executive officers. At the enterprise level, the intent of cooperation can be understood as a mechanism to enhance
performances by promoting the strategy through the joint investment of resources.
As a theoretical background related to the alliance between SMEs, based on transaction cost theory, resource-based theory and learning theory, the relationship between organizational capability and intent of cooperation, the impacts of organizational capability on alliance performance and the relationship between the intent of cooperation and alliance performance were verified.
This study carried out an analysis on the impacts of SMEs’ organizational capability, that is, the impact of marketing capability and technological capability on the intent of cooperation and alliance performances for
manufacturing-based companies with experiences on SMEs alliance.
The conceptual formation of this study is as follows: First, marketing capability is a capability to grasp knowledge and information necessary for exploration of the target of proper alliance and make smooth sales and distribution. Second, technological capability is a capability to maintain an enterprise’s sustainable competitive advantage. Third, intent of cooperation is a future-oriented will to maintain the mutual cooperative relations between alliance companies in spite of unexpected problems that may occur in the process of the alliance. Fourth, financial performances were defined as the degree of improvement by strategic alliance and fifth,
non-financial performances were defined as the status of achievement of the goals of alliance by strategic alliance.
For the main theories of the conclusion of strategic alliance and the results of empirical studies on performance decision factors in various fields, based on the results of a comprehensive analysis, research hypotheses that can be introduced in the future empirical studies were
proposed: SME’ organizational capabilities, that is, marketing capability and technological capability will have positive (+) impacts on intent of cooperation. SMEs’ organizational capabilities (marketing capability and technological capability) will have positive (+) impacts on the financial and non-financial performances of strategic alliance. SME’ intent of
cooperation will have positive (+) impacts on the financial and non-financial performances of strategic alliance.
For the actual investigation of the hypotheses of this study, research has been carried out for 30 days from April 1, 2013 to April 30, 2013, and a total of 134 copies were used for an analysis. With the collected data, the relationships of influence of independent variables on dependent variables were analyzed by proposing path coefficients by structural equation using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) Ver. 19.0 statistical package program and AMOS 7.0.
The results of the actual analysis are as follows: First, technological capability has a positive impact on intent of cooperation and alliance performances. In contrast, marketing capability does not have a significant impact on the intent of cooperation and alliance performance. Second, the intent of cooperation has a significant impact on alliance performance.
The results of this study demonstrated that manufacturing-based SMEs’ marketing capability does not have a significant impact on the intent of cooperation and alliance performance. The study shows that in manufacturing-based companies, technological capability rather than
marketing capability are likely to be an important criterion for the intent of cooperation and alliance performance. Thus, it suggests that for manufacturing-based SMEs, technological capability rather than marketing capability could act as a criterion for a cooperation partner. If this study
had inquired into the small and medium sized service firms, it is possible to have produced different results. In other words, the results of this
study only apply to certain sectors of business.
This study is significant in that it systematically organized the existing determinants of alliance performance from a
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1. e-Business, Rayport, Jeffrey F, McGraw-Hill Korea, , 2002
2. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, Psychometric theory, , 2000
3. On Strategic Networks, Jarrilo, , 1988
4. The Era of Open Innovation, Henry W.Chesbrough, , 2003
5. The entrepreneurial mindset, MacMillan I.C, McGrath R.M, , 2000
6. 일류 중견기업의 성공요인, 진현, , 2005
7. Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.), Hair, J. F., Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.), , 2006
8. The Relationship among Social Capital, Cheng-Nan, , 2007
9. AMOS 16.0 구조방정식 모형 분석, 김계수, Amos 160 구조방정식모형분석, , 2008
10. Gaining Insights Through Strategy Analysis, Day G.S, , 1983
1. e-Business, Rayport, Jeffrey F, McGraw-Hill Korea, , 2002
2. Psychometric Theory, Pummer, Psychometric theory, , 2000
3. On Strategic Networks, Jarrilo, , 1988
4. The Era of Open Innovation, Henry W.Chesbrough, , 2003
5. The entrepreneurial mindset, MacMillan I.C, McGrath R.M, , 2000
6. 일류 중견기업의 성공요인, 진현, , 2005
7. Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.), Hair, J. F., Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.), , 2006
8. The Relationship among Social Capital, Cheng-Nan, , 2007
9. AMOS 16.0 구조방정식 모형 분석, 김계수, Amos 160 구조방정식모형분석, , 2008
10. Gaining Insights Through Strategy Analysis, Day G.S, , 1983
11. Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion, Robert, , 1986
12. Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage, Barney, Jay B, Prentice Hall, Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, , 2002
13. A Resource-Based Theory of StrategicAlliances, Teng, Das, , 2000
14. LISREL 구조방정식모델 : 이해와 활용, 배병렬, 청람, LISREL 구조방정식 모델 : 이해와 활용, , 2005
15. 생태계 경영 시대의 동반 성장 전략, 김국태, , 2005
16. Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer, Silverman, Mowery, Oxley, , 1996
17. 중소기업간 협력에 관한 수요조사 결과, 중소기업청, , 2005
18. Joint Ventures: Theortical and Empirical Perspectives, Kogut,B., , 1988
19. Learning Knowledge Acquisition, and StrategicAlliances, Inkpen, "Learning Knowledge Acquisition, , 1998
20. 전략적 제휴의 성과 결정요인에 관한 고찰, 김용식, 윤수걸, , 2004
21. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance:, Lee,C., Pennings,J.M., "Internal Capabilities, , 2001
22. 혁신형 중소기업의 성공사례 연구와 시사점, 김승일, 과학기술정책연구원, , 2007
23. A regional industrial perspective on canadaunder free trade, Britton, , 1993
24. Neither Market nor Hierarchy : Network Forms of Organization, Powel, , 1990
25. Relative absorptive capacityand inter-organizational learning, Lubatkin, Lane, , 1998
26. 한국 제조기업의 국제 전략적제휴 성공결정요인, 송우용, 한국무역학회, , 1997
27. Innovation, Organizational Capabilities, and the Born-Global Firm, S.T.Cavusgil, Knight, , 2004
28. 중소기업-대기업의 관계: 협력유형 및 산업정책??, 홍장표, , 2000
29. The Effect of Strategic TechnologyAlliances on Company Performance, Hargadoorn, Schakenraad.J., , 1994
30. The knowledge link: How firms compete through strategic alliance, Badaracco, , 1991
31. An investigation of partnersimilarity dimensions on knowledge transfer, Kurtzberg T.R, Darr E.D, , 2000
32. Uncertainty reduction mechanismsin cross-sector alliances in Latin America, Koljatic Mladen, Silva M?nica, , 2008
33. “Interfirm Alliances in the Small Business: The Role of Social Networks”, BarNir A, Smith K.A, Interfirm alliances in the smallbusiness: The role of social networks, , 2002
34. Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach, Debackere K, Faems,D., , 2005
35. 개방형 혁신이 기업성과에 미치는 영향 : 흡수능력의 역할, 한평호 (, , 2010
36. 제품개발요인이 경영성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구, 이상복, 이광수, , 2011
37. StrategicTypes Distinctive Marketing Competencies and OrganizationalPerformance:, Varadarajan P.R, Conant J.S., , 1990
38. R&D 역량 강화를 위한 IT 지원정책에 관한 연구: 철강산업 사례, 김성홍, 김진한, , 2009
39. 우리나라 기업의 국제 전략적 제휴 성과에 관한연구 ITBI 리뷰, 정태영, 이광철, , 2008
40. 한국 제조기업의 시장지향적 기술혁신 전략에 관한실증 연구, 김기영, 허대식, 대한민국 학술원, , 2011
41. 서비스기업 전략적 제휴의 제휴역량이 제휴성과에미치는 영향, 정준이, 조인환, , 2007
42. Validity of exploratory factoranalysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis, Gerbing W, Hamilton.J.G, , 1996
43. Performance implications ofstrategic fit between alliance attributes and alliance forms, M.Kotabe, Murray, , 2004
44. The Network as a GovernanceStructure: Interfirm Cooperation beyond Markets and Hierarchies, J.Johanson, Hakansson H, , 1994
45. 중소기업의 산업환경 기술협력 및 성과간의 구조적 관계에관한 연구, 나상균, , 2009
46. 중소기업 융합활동 실태 및 활성화 방안: 기업간기술융합을 중심으로, 양현봉, 박종복, , 2011
47. 온라인 벤처기업의 전략적 제휴에 대한 공시가 기업가치에 미치는 영향, 이선로, 김문주, , 2004
49. Don't go italone: Alliance network composition and startups'performance in Canadian biotechnology, B.Silverman, Baum.J, , 2000
50. 이동통신사업자간의 서로 다른 제휴형태가 성과에미치는 영향에 관한 연구, 정지범, 차태훈, , 2001
51. Cooperative strategy and new ventureperformance: The role of business strategy and managementexperience, McGee, , 1995
52. 아웃소싱 활성화을 통한 제조업 경쟁력 강화방안: 계약생산서비스를 중심으로, 이항구, , 2003
53. Linking Business Relationship to MarketingStrategy and Export Performance: A Proposed conceptualFramework, Felicitas U.Evangelista, , 1996
54. Technology S-curves in renewable energyalternative: Analysis and implications for industry and government, Schilling M.A, , 2009
55. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms, Schoonhoven, Eisenhardt, , 1996
56. Structural equation modeling in practicesa review and recommended two-step approach psychologicalbulletin vol, Gerbing, Anderson, , 1988
57. 섬유업체간 전략적 제휴성과의 결정요인 : 대구·경북지역 중소섬유업체를 중심으로, 박경애, 박광희, , 2004
58. Achieving Superior Innovation-basedPerformance Outcomes in SMEs through Innovation Resource-capabilityComplementarity, O’Cass Aron, Sok Phyral, , 2011
59. Technology Strategy and Software NewVentures’ Performance: Exploring the Moderating Effect of the CompetitiveEnvironment, Zahra,Shaker A., Bogner W.C, , 1999
60. Strategic Flexibility inInformation Technology Alliances: The Influence of TransactionCost Economics and Social Exchange Theory, Wiersema, Young-Ybarra, , 1999
61. Understanding the Rationale of Strategic TechnologyPartnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and SectoralDifferences, Hargadoorn, Understanding the rationale of strategic technologypartnering: inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoraldifferences, , 1993
62. The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Reuben, D.A.Kenny, , 1986
64. 중소기업의 경쟁역량조사 평가에 관한 연구: 지식관점의 경쟁역량 평가모델프레임워크를 중심으로, 김승일, , 2005
65. Value Rareness, Competitive Advantage, andPerformance: A Conceptual-level Empirical Investigation of theResource-based View of the Firm, Newbert S.L, "Value Rareness, , 2008
66. 중소수출기업의 역량과 해외마케팅 제휴선의 역량간의 상호작용이 수출성과에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석, 이병호, , 2008
67. An Examination into the Causal Logic ofRent Generation: Contrasting Porter’ Competitive Strategy Frameworkand the Resource-based Perspective, Spanos Y.E, , 2001
68. Vendor 기업의 핵심역량과 기업성과간의 관계에 관한 연구: 파트너십의 조절효과 및 경쟁우위의 매개효과를 중심으로, 김동원, , 2010