수영참여자의 여가제약협상전략이 여가몰입 및 사회적행복감에 미치는 영향 = (The) effect of swimming leisure constraints negotiation, leisure flow experience and social happiness

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is aimed to investigate differences in leisure constraints negotiation, leisure flow experience and social happiness of adults that participate in swimming program and examine empirically on what causality exists among variable. To achieve this goal, adults participating swimming program in Busan region in 2012 were chosen as the population and for sampling, the valid sample of 480 persons have been used for the analysis using purposeful sampling.
Questionnaires for this study consisted of 70questions: 10demographic questions, 22leisure constraints negotiation questions, 12leisure flow experience questions, 26social happiness questions. As a data analysis, t-test, One-way ANOVA and multiple regression analysis have been executed, using Window SPSS Ver. 18.0 program. The major results are as follow:
1) Leisure constraints negotiation strategies according to gender, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First, define the cognitive immersion factor was found to be higher in women than in men, according to gender commitment immersion factor was higher in men than in women.
Second, Leisure constraints negotiation strategies according to gender, activity fees and raising time management appeared to be higher in men than in women.
Third, there was no significant difference according to gender, social euphoria.
2) According to the age of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First, the commitment from the immersion factor defined according to age group 20, 30, 50, 60 higher than the large group was
Second, according to the age of leisure constraints negotiation strategy skills factors, activity fees and raising factors in the time-management was found to be higher than the group 30 group 60, 20s, 40s, 50s, 20s, 30s, 40 groups were higher than the group of the 50s and 60s. Eager to changes in the factor group of 30 was higher than the group of 20, 60.
Third, according to the age of social euphoria showed that interpersonal factors in the 40s, 50s, 60s, factors higher than 20 factors.
3) According to the Education of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First, according to the Education commitment, there was no significant difference.
Second, according to the Education of leisure constraints negotiation strategy, there was no significant difference.
Education in the social euphoria, there was no significant difference.
4) According to the occupation of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First, it was higher than the group sales / service groups, housewives, students from the immersion factor defined according to occupational commitment.
Second, according to the occupation of leisure constraints negotiation strategies laid activity fee and time management factors management / managerial, sales / service industry group to be higher than the group of housewives, students, respectively.
Third euphoria, according to the profession of social factors in the sale of health promotion / management / managerial, professional / technical, business owners / freedom directly, housewives, students, unemployed, higher than the other groups, showed interpersonal relationship factors in the service industry group housewife , was higher than other groups of students, sales / service industry groups.
5) A career in leisure constraints negotiation strategies, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First, there was no significant difference according to career commitment.
Second, according to the career of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, factors in the search effort for more than two years, the participants higher than the less than one year, participants appeared, skills, and higher than the less than one year, participants from more than two years, participants were eager to change factors.
Third, career in the social euphoria, there was no significant difference.
6) The level of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First, according to the level of commitment appeared to be higher than the group Beginners Intermediate Advanced group, cognitive immersion factor, and define the immersion factor was the beginner, intermediate, advanced collective group is higher than
Leisure constraints negotiation strategies according to the level of activity costs and raising factors in the time-management, the advanced group is higher than beginner group showed skills factors were intermediate, advanced beginner group higher than the group.
Third, according to the level of social happiness, health promotion, and interpersonal relationship factors in the advanced group of beginner, was higher than the intermediate group.
7) Participation in leisure constraints negotiation strategies, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First commitment according to participation status, cognitive immersion factor in the 4-6 days was higher than the 1 to 3 participants who participate.
Second, the search effort of leisure constraints negotiation strategies according to participation status, skills, eager to change factors were 1-3 participants to be higher than the 4 to 6 participants.
Third, social participation according to the status of the euphoria, there was no significant difference.
8) On the time interval of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First, there was no significant difference according to the time required commitment.
Second, leisure constraints, negotiation strategies according to the time required search effort, skills, aspirations change factors appeared to be higher than the less than 1 hour to 1 hour or more participants Contributors.
Third, the social euphoria due to the time required, there was no significant difference.
9) Hours of leisure constraints negotiation strategy, commitment, and leisure and social differences of euphoria
First, the commitment according to the hours were not significantly different.
Second, according to the hours of leisure constraints negotiation strategies factors dawn on the collective skills higher than the AM group showed activity fee raise, and time management factors in the dawn, the evening group was higher than the AM group, showed
Third, the social hours of happiness was the evening of the dawn, the PM group than the group higher in the health-promoting factors.
10) Participated for the purpose of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, leisure flow, the difference between the social euphoria
First, according to the purpose of participating Immersion from the immersion factor, the cognitive weight control groups were higher than the friendship group.
Second, participation in accordance with the purpose of leisure constraints negotiation strategies navigation factors in the rehabilitation efforts, that the friendship group is higher than the group health was friendship group was higher than the group health, activity fee and raising the time management factor.
Third, participation in accordance with the purpose of social euphoria, there was no significant difference.
11) The impact of leisure constraints negotiation strategies Leisure Flow
Leisure flow adjust the intensity of leisure constraints negotiation strategies of the sub-factors, cognitive commitment showed positive impact.
Second, adjust the intensity of leisure constraints negotiation strategies showed positive impact on affective commitment of the sub-factors of Leisure Flow
12) The impact of leisure constraints negotiation strategies social euphoria
First, it was to adjust the intensity of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, energy charge of the social euphoria sub-factors which have a positive impact on the enjoyment of
Second, the activity fee raise, and time management, energy charge, sub-factors of social euphoria, a sense of accomplishment in a positive impact of leisure constraints negotiation strategies of the search effort, was
Charging activity fees and raising time management, energy has a positive impact on the social euphoria of the sub-factors of interpersonal relationships, leisure constraints negotiation strategies of the search effort, was
Fourth, the search effort of leisure constraints negotiation strategies, showed activity fee raise, and time management, positive impact on energy charge in promoting the health of the sub-factors of social euphoria.
Fifth, the charging activity fees and raising time management, energy sub-factors of the social euphoria challenge has a positive impact on the sense of leisure constraints negotiation strategies of the search effort, was
13) Leisure Immersion impact of social euphoria
Social euphoria of the three factors has a positive impact on the enjoyment, leisure flow of cognitive commitment was
Second, the cognitive leisure flow showed a positive impact sub-factors of social euphoria, a sense of accomplishment in immersive.
Third, cognitive immersion of Leisure Flow showed a positive impact on the social euphoria of the sub-factors of interpersonal relationships.
Fourth, cognitive immersion of Leisure Flow showed a positive impact on the sub-factors of social happiness health promotion.
Fifth, leisure flow of cognitive immersion showed a positive impact sub-factors of social happiness in the sense of challenge.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 1
• 1. 연구의 목적 및 필요성 1
• 2. 연구가설 5
• 3. 연구의 제한점 7
• 4. 용어의 정의 8
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 10
• 1. 여가제약협상전략 10
• 2. 여가몰입 13
• 3. 사회적 행복감 17
• 4. 선행연구 고찰 19
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 22
• 1. 연구대상 22
• 2. 조사도구 24
• 3. 연구모형 32
• 4. 연구절차 33
• 5. 자료분석 34
• Ⅳ. 연구결과 35
• 1. 인구통계학적 특성에 따른 여가제약협상전략, 여가몰입, 사회적 행복감의 차이 35
• 2. 여가제약협상전략이 여가몰입에 미치는 영향 60
• 3. 여가제약협상전략이 사회적 행복감에 미치는 영향 63
• 4. 여가몰입이 사회적 행복감에 미치는 영향 72
• Ⅴ. 논의 79
• 1. 인구통계학적 특성에 따른 여가제약협상전략, 여가몰입, 사회적 행복감의 차이 79
• 2. 여가제약협상전략이 여가몰입에 미치는 영향 97
• 3. 여가제약협상전략이 사회적 행복감에 미치는 영향 92
• 4. 여가몰입이 사회적 행복감에 미치는 영향 94
• Ⅵ. 결론 96
• 1. 결론 96
• 2. 제언 101
• 참고문헌 102
• 부록 113
• Abstract 118