RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    학교폭력에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13232826

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    School violence is depicted as a serious social problem, but still the concept and scope of violence in schools is unclear. This study aimed to provide a definitive depiction of the actual situation of school violence by analyzing students and teachers’ perceptions of the violence index with 10 levels of violence, and help have sensitivity to school violence. Depending on the purpose of this study, the following research questions were set.
    First, from which level of violence do teachers and students perceive as violence?
    Second, from which level of violence do they think needs teachers’ intervention?
    Third, which level of violence occurs most frequently in schools?
    Fourth, How would they reconstruct(rearrange) 10 levels of violence?
    These questions were explored in a survey of 110 teachers and 250 students of secondary schools in the west Gyeongnam province. Their perceptions of school violence using the survey questions were analyzed and the results are as follows.
    First, for levels of violence they perceive as violence, it is advisable to provide a single perspective for teachers and students because of disparity in evaluating levels of violence between teachers and students.
    Second, for teachers’ intervention, teachers found it necessary to intervene from the early stage of violence but students needed it from more serious levels of violence, which calls for the professional development of teachers to strengthen students’ trust in teachers.
    Third, the most frequent violence in schools was mental (psychological) violence below level 5. Considering that students did not perceive lower levels of violence as violence, more active guidance is needed for developing students’ awareness.
    Fourth, there was a disparity in the responses of teachers and students about serious levels of mental (psychological) violence, and it requires guidance for students’ perspective of mental violence. For reconstruction of levels of physical violence, there was no significant difference between students and teachers.
    In order to discover and prevent violence from the early stages, it is necessary to perceive all the levels of violence from level 1 to 10 as violence and to take a careful look at students.
    Based on the findings of this study, the main proposals are as follows.
    First, to create uniformity in perceiving violence, more active consensus is needed for developing awareness of 10 levels of violence and perceiving lower levels of violence as violence.
    Second, teachers’ credible intervention should be performed with the support of the institutional device to strengthen teachers’capability.
    Third, it is advisable to create an atmosphere of embracing both the victims and perpetrators of school violence by strengthening the education that builds students' character as well as the ongoing prevention education.
    Finally, in follow-up studies, rearranging 10 levels of violence in accordance with frequent types of violence in schools is needed, and recreating a school violence index is also needed because verbal and psychological violence in the early stages is not necessarily lower level of violence than physical violence.
    번역하기

    School violence is depicted as a serious social problem, but still the concept and scope of violence in schools is unclear. This study aimed to provide a definitive depiction of the actual situation of school violence by analyzing students and teacher...

    School violence is depicted as a serious social problem, but still the concept and scope of violence in schools is unclear. This study aimed to provide a definitive depiction of the actual situation of school violence by analyzing students and teachers’ perceptions of the violence index with 10 levels of violence, and help have sensitivity to school violence. Depending on the purpose of this study, the following research questions were set.
    First, from which level of violence do teachers and students perceive as violence?
    Second, from which level of violence do they think needs teachers’ intervention?
    Third, which level of violence occurs most frequently in schools?
    Fourth, How would they reconstruct(rearrange) 10 levels of violence?
    These questions were explored in a survey of 110 teachers and 250 students of secondary schools in the west Gyeongnam province. Their perceptions of school violence using the survey questions were analyzed and the results are as follows.
    First, for levels of violence they perceive as violence, it is advisable to provide a single perspective for teachers and students because of disparity in evaluating levels of violence between teachers and students.
    Second, for teachers’ intervention, teachers found it necessary to intervene from the early stage of violence but students needed it from more serious levels of violence, which calls for the professional development of teachers to strengthen students’ trust in teachers.
    Third, the most frequent violence in schools was mental (psychological) violence below level 5. Considering that students did not perceive lower levels of violence as violence, more active guidance is needed for developing students’ awareness.
    Fourth, there was a disparity in the responses of teachers and students about serious levels of mental (psychological) violence, and it requires guidance for students’ perspective of mental violence. For reconstruction of levels of physical violence, there was no significant difference between students and teachers.
    In order to discover and prevent violence from the early stages, it is necessary to perceive all the levels of violence from level 1 to 10 as violence and to take a careful look at students.
    Based on the findings of this study, the main proposals are as follows.
    First, to create uniformity in perceiving violence, more active consensus is needed for developing awareness of 10 levels of violence and perceiving lower levels of violence as violence.
    Second, teachers’ credible intervention should be performed with the support of the institutional device to strengthen teachers’capability.
    Third, it is advisable to create an atmosphere of embracing both the victims and perpetrators of school violence by strengthening the education that builds students' character as well as the ongoing prevention education.
    Finally, in follow-up studies, rearranging 10 levels of violence in accordance with frequent types of violence in schools is needed, and recreating a school violence index is also needed because verbal and psychological violence in the early stages is not necessarily lower level of violence than physical violence.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 및 연구문제 3
    • 3. 용어의 정의 3
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 4
    • Ⅰ. 서론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
    • 2. 연구의 목적 및 연구문제 3
    • 3. 용어의 정의 3
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 4
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 5
    • 1. 학교폭력의 개념과 유형 5
    • 2. 학교폭력에 영향을 미치는 요인 8
    • 3. 학교폭력의 경향 및 특징 11
    • 4. 학교폭력의 실태 12
    • 5. 선행연구 분석 13
    • Ⅲ. 조사방법 17
    • 1. 조사대상 17
    • 2. 조사 도구 18
    • 3. 자료처리방법 18
    • Ⅳ. 조사 결과 분석 19
    • 1. 학교폭력의 범위 19
    • 2. 학교폭력에 대한 교사의 개입 24
    • 3. 학교에서 많이 발생하는 폭력의 유형 27
    • 4. 폭력지수 10단계의 재구성 30
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 35
    • 1. 요약 35
    • 2. 논의 37
    • 3. 결론 및 제언 38
    • 참고문헌 41
    • 부록: 설문지 43
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼