RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국어 말하기 숙달도 평가 도구 개발

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13112352

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study aims at developing and proposing a Korean speaking proficiency test tool. It is speaking that is one of the most important language skills in communication, and communicative speaking proficiency means how accurately, fluently a speaker use a language and how properly and consistently he or she reacts in communication and the relationship among the participants.
      The number of Korean learners has been growing continuously and so has the number of applicants for Test of Proficiency in Korean(TOPIK), however, TOPIK doesn't include speaking. It deprives Korean learners of a chance to get a objective test on what they have learned and teachers of a chance not only to check what the learners are lack of but also to fill the lack. In addition, Korean educational institutes don't get any help to set a curriculum and a syllabus accordingly. There must be an appropriate speaking proficiency test developed for a balanced language education with other language skills.
      Chapter 1 presents the purpose and needs of this study based on statistics and the causes of Korean speaking test absence. The scope of this study is determined within the topic of web-based Korean speaking proficiency test, and this study reviews previous studies in four different categories of general speaking tests, Korean speaking tests, Korean speaking test models, and Korean speaking test items. It also reviews the limitations of each study.
      Chapter 2 reviews the existing definitions of communicative skills and speaking proficiency for a theoretical background to designing a Korean speaking proficiency test.
      Chapter 3 examines if those definitions of speaking proficiency are reflected on existing English speaking tests and a Korean speaking test. It also reviews the limitations of each test.
      Chapter 4 determines constructs of speaking test based on the definitions in chapter 3. And then proposes Test of Korean Speaking(TOKS) as a new Korean speaking proficiency test model to overcome the limitations of existing speaking tests.
      Chapter 5 defines the significance of this study as this study presents a test tool that contains essential constructs which has been considered vital in existing theories on communicative skills and speaking proficiency. Moreover, this speaking test model has its facility, economic efficiency, and practicality. However, there are limitations of this Korean speaking proficiency test model that it hasn't gone through any verification and the programs utilized for the test model may change in accordance with the development of technology.
      번역하기

      This study aims at developing and proposing a Korean speaking proficiency test tool. It is speaking that is one of the most important language skills in communication, and communicative speaking proficiency means how accurately, fluently a speaker use...

      This study aims at developing and proposing a Korean speaking proficiency test tool. It is speaking that is one of the most important language skills in communication, and communicative speaking proficiency means how accurately, fluently a speaker use a language and how properly and consistently he or she reacts in communication and the relationship among the participants.
      The number of Korean learners has been growing continuously and so has the number of applicants for Test of Proficiency in Korean(TOPIK), however, TOPIK doesn't include speaking. It deprives Korean learners of a chance to get a objective test on what they have learned and teachers of a chance not only to check what the learners are lack of but also to fill the lack. In addition, Korean educational institutes don't get any help to set a curriculum and a syllabus accordingly. There must be an appropriate speaking proficiency test developed for a balanced language education with other language skills.
      Chapter 1 presents the purpose and needs of this study based on statistics and the causes of Korean speaking test absence. The scope of this study is determined within the topic of web-based Korean speaking proficiency test, and this study reviews previous studies in four different categories of general speaking tests, Korean speaking tests, Korean speaking test models, and Korean speaking test items. It also reviews the limitations of each study.
      Chapter 2 reviews the existing definitions of communicative skills and speaking proficiency for a theoretical background to designing a Korean speaking proficiency test.
      Chapter 3 examines if those definitions of speaking proficiency are reflected on existing English speaking tests and a Korean speaking test. It also reviews the limitations of each test.
      Chapter 4 determines constructs of speaking test based on the definitions in chapter 3. And then proposes Test of Korean Speaking(TOKS) as a new Korean speaking proficiency test model to overcome the limitations of existing speaking tests.
      Chapter 5 defines the significance of this study as this study presents a test tool that contains essential constructs which has been considered vital in existing theories on communicative skills and speaking proficiency. Moreover, this speaking test model has its facility, economic efficiency, and practicality. However, there are limitations of this Korean speaking proficiency test model that it hasn't gone through any verification and the programs utilized for the test model may change in accordance with the development of technology.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론 1
      • 1.1 연구의 목적과 필요성 2
      • 1.2 연구의 내용과 범위 3
      • 1.3 선행 연구 4
      • II. 이론적 배경 10
      • I. 서론 1
      • 1.1 연구의 목적과 필요성 2
      • 1.2 연구의 내용과 범위 3
      • 1.3 선행 연구 4
      • II. 이론적 배경 10
      • 2.1 의사소통능력 10
      • 2.2 말하기 능력 14
      • III. 현행 말하기 평가 분석 16
      • 3.1 ACTFL-OPIc 16
      • 3.2 TOEFL iBT Speaking 18
      • 3.3 TOEIC Speaking 19
      • 3.4 ESPT General 20
      • 3.5 KPE 말하기 21
      • IV. 한국어 말하기 평가 도구 개발 24
      • 4.1 한국어 말하기 평가 모형 24
      • 4.1.1 평가 대상과 평가 범주 24
      • 4.1.2 평가 모형 26
      • 4.2 한국어 말하기 평가 도구 29
      • 4.2.1 평가 내용과 문항 유형 29
      • 4.2.2 평가 방식과 평가 기준 33
      • 4.3 한국어 말하기 평가의 실행 53
      • 4.3.1 문항 53
      • 4.3.2 채점 56
      • V. 결론 62
      • 참고 문헌 64
      • 부록 67
      • 영문 초록 78
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼