언어노출환경에 따른 한국어 학습자의 조사 결합 습득 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to show the ‘acquisition order’ and ‘acquisition pattern’ of Korean particle combination under different language exposure.
Three group of Chinese learners under different language exposure were enrolled in test which was designed to examine development of learner language in the acquisition of particle combination. (1)Instruction Only: Subjects came from a university in China. They are majoring in Korean, and their only exposure to and conversation with Korean speakers came through classroom and textbook instruction. (2)Naturalistic: Subjects are married female immigrants, and their exposure to and conversation with Korean speakers came from residence in the Korean-speaking community, and (3)Mixed (a combination of 1 and 2): Subjects in this group were attending an intensive Korean program at a university in Korea, and their exposure to and conversation with Korean speakers came from both classroom and textbook instruction and the wider community.
Effects of the three conditions of second language exposure were revealed in the acquisition order and acquisition pattern of particle combination. It was tested by analyzing using the implicational table for implicational scaling. The test results are following:
First, 「semantic case markers(의미격 조사)+particle(첨사)」, 「postposition(후치사)+particle(첨사)」 are most easily acquired, and lastly acquired are「combination with grammatical case markers(문법격 조사) ‘의’」, 「combination with ‘이/가’, ‘을/를’ which has ‘semantic functions’」 in all group. There is a difference with Naturalistic group between Instruction Only & Mixed group. The difference is that Naturalistic subjects easily acquired 「semantic combination between postposition and semantic case markers」than 「semantic case markers+postposition」.
Second, Combination with particle such as 「semantic case markers+particle」, 「postposition+particle」 shows the highest percentage of correct answers in Mixed group, and 「semantic combination between postposition and semantic case markers」shows the highest percentage of correct answers in Naturalistic group.
Third, In terms of proficiency, the levels of proficiency is related to acquisition of particle combination in Naturalistic group. In this study, cause the levels of proficiency in Naturalistic group was determined by period of residence in Korea. so this result means that acquiring particle combination is related to period of residence in Korea in Naturalistic group.
Through this study I tried to find the ‘acquisition order’ and ‘acquisition pattern’ of Korean particle combination under different language exposure.. This study implies the need for an organized teaching order and teaching methods of particle combination and will assist teachers to develop the effective teaching methods.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론 1
• 1.1 연구 목적 1
• 1.2 선행 연구 3
• 1.2.1 조사 습득 3
• 1.2.2 발달 패턴 6
• 1.2.3 조사 결합 10
• 1.3 연구 방법 15
• 2. 언어노출환경과 제2언어 습득 16
• 2.1 언어노출환경 16
• 2.2 제2언어 습득 이론 17
• 2.2.1 Krashen의 입력 가설 17
• 2.2.2 McLaughlin의 주의 집중처리 모형 19
• 3. 연구 대상 및 절차 22
• 3.1 연구 대상 22
• 3.2 연구 도구 23
• 3.3 분석 항목 설정 25
• 3.4 분석 방법 32
• 4. 연구 결과 분석 36
• 4.1 함축적 평가를 통한 조사 결합 습득 순서 36
• 4.1.1 학습 환경 한국어 학습자의 조사 결합 습득 순서 36
• 4.1.2 자연적 환경 한국어 학습자의 조사 결합 습득 순서 40
• 4.1.3 혼합 환경 한국어 학습자의 조사 결합 습득 순서 43
• 4.1.4 언어노출환경에 따른 조사 결합 습득 순서 비교 46
• 4.2 조사 결합 유형별 습득 양상 52
• 4.2.1 의미격 조사+첨사의 습득 양상 52
• 4.2.2 의미격 조사+후치사의 습득 양상 54
• 4.2.3 문법격 조사 의와의 결합의 습득 양상 56
• 4.2.4 후치사+첨사의 습득 양상 58
• 4.2.5 의미기능의 주격조사, 목적격조사와의 결합의 습득 양상 60
• 4.2.6 후치사, 의미격 조사 간의 의미적 결합의 습득 양상 62
• 4.2.7 조사 결합의 습득 양상 비교 64
• 5. 결론 68
• 참고문헌 71
• ABSTRACT 85