RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      삶의 의미 영향 요인 : 성인과 노인 비교

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T13079038

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 경희대학교 대학원, 2013

      • 학위논문사항
      • 발행연도

        2013

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • DDC

        612 판사항(22)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 기타서명

        The factors tha affect meaning of life the adult and the elderly

      • 형태사항

        66 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 김귀분
        경희대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.
        참고문헌: p. 45-56

      • 소장기관
        • 경희대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Introduction & Purpose :
      The increase in the adult and elderly population is causing problems such as a weakening of the welfare support for the adult and elderly persons, isolation, and other problems. With the rising concern on the qualitative life in relation to the satisfaction of the elderly about their lives, the necessity to recognize and control the factors which affect meaning of life has become evident.

      Methods :
      The period of collection the material was from October 23th to November 3th of 2012, by surveying 210 in adults from 45 to 64 years old and 198 in elderly above the age of 65.
      Data were analyzed with SPSS window 20.0 program. To meet the purpose of the search, descriptive statistics, Spearman Correlation, and multiple regression were performed.
      Results :
      1. The degree of meaning of life in Adults were significantly higher than in elderly(F=4.253, p=.040).
      2. The degree of meaning of life(t=3.611, p<.001), successful aging(t= 2.563, p<.011), self-transcendence value(t=4.967, p<.001) showed significantly difference between in adults and elderly.
      3. The predictors of meaning of life in adults and elders were successful aging(β=0.353), hope(β=0.289), self-transcendence value(β=0.189), and allowance(β=0.117) in adults and hope(β=0.351), life satisfaction (β=0.272), successful aging(β=0.274) in elders. The biggest factor was successful aging in adults and hope in elders. These factors enabled to explain 51.9% of the total variance in adults and 59.4 % in elders.

      Conclusion :
      Based on these findings, the above major influencing factors(successful aging in adults and hope in elderly, especially) should be considered to develop a new nursing program for the meaning of life.
      번역하기

      Introduction & Purpose : The increase in the adult and elderly population is causing problems such as a weakening of the welfare support for the adult and elderly persons, isolation, and other problems. With the rising concern on the qualitative ...

      Introduction & Purpose :
      The increase in the adult and elderly population is causing problems such as a weakening of the welfare support for the adult and elderly persons, isolation, and other problems. With the rising concern on the qualitative life in relation to the satisfaction of the elderly about their lives, the necessity to recognize and control the factors which affect meaning of life has become evident.

      Methods :
      The period of collection the material was from October 23th to November 3th of 2012, by surveying 210 in adults from 45 to 64 years old and 198 in elderly above the age of 65.
      Data were analyzed with SPSS window 20.0 program. To meet the purpose of the search, descriptive statistics, Spearman Correlation, and multiple regression were performed.
      Results :
      1. The degree of meaning of life in Adults were significantly higher than in elderly(F=4.253, p=.040).
      2. The degree of meaning of life(t=3.611, p<.001), successful aging(t= 2.563, p<.011), self-transcendence value(t=4.967, p<.001) showed significantly difference between in adults and elderly.
      3. The predictors of meaning of life in adults and elders were successful aging(β=0.353), hope(β=0.289), self-transcendence value(β=0.189), and allowance(β=0.117) in adults and hope(β=0.351), life satisfaction (β=0.272), successful aging(β=0.274) in elders. The biggest factor was successful aging in adults and hope in elders. These factors enabled to explain 51.9% of the total variance in adults and 59.4 % in elders.

      Conclusion :
      Based on these findings, the above major influencing factors(successful aging in adults and hope in elderly, especially) should be considered to develop a new nursing program for the meaning of life.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 4
      • 3. 용어의 정의 5
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 6
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 4
      • 3. 용어의 정의 5
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 6
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
      • 1. 인간과 삶의 의미 7
      • 2. 삶의 의미 영향 요인 11
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법
      • 1. 연구 설계 20
      • 2. 연구 대상 20
      • 3. 자료수집 및 기간 및 방법 20
      • 4. 연구 도구 21
      • 5. 연구진행 및 자료수집 23
      • 6. 자료 분석방법 25
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과
      • 1. 대상자의 집단 간 인구사회학적 특성 및 동질성 검증 26
      • 2. 성인과 노인의 연구 변수 간 상관관계 28
      • 3. 성인과 노인의 삶의 의미 관련 요인 비교 29
      • 4. 성인과 노인의 삶의 의미 영향 요인 32
      • Ⅴ. 논의 36
      • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 43
      • 참고문헌 45
      • 영문초록 57
      • 부록 59
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼