비선호시설 입지를 둘러싼 갈등구조분석 : 삼척시 원자력발전소 유치과정을 중심으로 = (An) Analysis on Conflict Structures in the location of Non-Preferred Facilities : Focus on the Siting Process of nuclear power plants in Samcheok.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Diversification trend of contemporary times gives rise to diversified conflicts in the various fields of the society. In this thesis, locational conflict involved in attraction of nuclear power plant, a typical case of locational conflict for non-preference facility, was analyzed. starting from a critical mind that 'policy conflict' in diversified form is inevitably taken place in selecting location of non-preference facility like nuclear poser plant, this study is intended to develop and suggest a conflict management scheme as to how to minimize conflicts among the stakeholders from the discussion stage of location selection to its selection and to systemize it so that it may be utilized for analysis and management of conflict caused by non-preference facility in the future.
As a research method, literature examination was utilized and through analysis of existing literatures, direction of study and its analysis model were established. In this study, conflict process was classified into conflict generation stage, surfaced stage, expansion stage and moderation stage and based on this, stakeholders, point of dispute and conflict cause were analyzed.
Factors affecting a process as per each stage were mainly divided into political, administrative factor, economic factor, technical factor, psychological factor and environmental factor and a cause of locational conflict was deduced by observing main factors affecting each stage rather than analyzing every factors. Through this analysis, it could be realized that economic factor at generation stage, political, administrative factor at conflict surfaced stage and technical and political, administrative factors at conflict expansion stage played a big part.
When summing up conflict cause based on this, it could be summarized as first, values of stakeholders, inconsistency of interest, second, neglect of reflecting residents' opinion in a process of site selection, third, difference of cognition for risk, fourth, non-disclosure of policy decision procedure, fifth, lack of negotiation effort.
Solutions for resolving locational conflict based on deduced cause is summarized as follows. First, on a political, administrative level, it is required to have local residents actually participate in a process of site selection of nuclear power plant and its promotion and to disclose various informations from the stage of policy institution. Second, on an economic level, contrary to the past, it is required to strengthen economic attractions and publicize it so that sustained income, not one-off provision of development fund, could be secured. In addition, in order to eliminate unconditional distrust for an effect of income increase, objective assessment and publicity activity through involvement of third party are required. Third, in order to obtain public acceptability on a technical level, information for nuclear power plant shall be disclosed completely so that it may be accessible to anybody and regarding facility operation or safety control, by promoting learning of the stakeholders through organization of joint survey team after introducing a method of residents' participation through monitoring team of residents, it shall be made to be contributed to rationality enhancement for risk communication among the parties concerned. Fourth, on a reliability terms, an organization of discussing policy participated by private/public sector, through which risk factor to be raised in connection with attraction of nuclear power plant could be more broadly discussed and public opinion would be converged, shall be provided and bilateral publicity, where mutual understanding is increased, shall be performed, getting away from unilateral publicity based on the client for the existing nuclear power plants. And by organizing a third consultative body that enables neutral and objective discussion as a stakeholder relevant to attraction of nuclear power plant, it shall be made to be contributed to rationality enhancement for risk communication among the parties concerned.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
• 2. 연구의 범위와 연구방법 2
• Ⅱ. 비선호시설 입지갈등에 대한 이론적 배경 3
• 1. 비선호시설의 정의 3
• 1) 비선호시설의 개념 3
• 2) 비선호시설의 유형 6
• 3) 비선호시설의 특성 9
• 2. 비선호시설의 입지갈등 11
• 1) 비선호시설 입지갈등의 개념 11
• 2) 비선호시설 입지갈등의 특성 14
• 3) 비선호시설 입지갈등의 유형 16
• 4) 비선호시설 입지갈등의 요인 19
• 3. 연구의 분석틀 32
• 1) 분석의 범위 32
• 2) 갈등단계의 설정 33
• 3) 분석모형 35
• III. 삼척시 원자력발전소 입지갈등 사례분석 37
• 1. 원자력발전소의 현황 37
• 2. 삼척시 원자력발전소 유치를 둘러싼 갈등전개과정 41
• 1) 유치의 추진배경 41
• 2) 갈등전개과정 42
• (1) 생성단계 43
• (2) 표면화단계 45
• (3) 확대단계 48
• (4) 완화단계 53
• 3. 삼척시 원자력발전소 유치를 둘러싼 갈등구조분석 54
• 1) 이해당사자 분석 54
• 2) 쟁점분석 57
• 3) 갈등요인분석 64
• 4) 입지갈등의 원인분석 67
• 4. 비선호시설 유치를 둘러싼 갈등해결 방안 69
• 1) 갈등주기별 갈등해결기제 69
• 2) 갈등해결방안 71
• (1) 정치 · 행정적 차원 71
• (2) 경제적 차원 73
• (3) 기술적 차원 73
• (4) 신뢰적 차원 74
• Ⅳ. 결 론 77
• 1. 연구결과의 종합 77
• 2. 정책적 시사점 79
• 3. 제언 80
• 참 고 문 헌 81
• 국 문 초 록 87