한·중·일 문화콘텐츠 인력양성정책 및 지원프로그램 비교 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

ABSTRACT

A Comparative Study of Training Policies and Support Programs to Develop a Cultural Content Workforce in Korea, China, and Japan

In the late twentieth century, a new paradigm for the information age emerged along with hopeful expectations of the new millennium. Once, high-end technology and media had been the telos of the so-called information age, since they were the fire of Prometheus that made it possible to communicate and to circulate information; however, the circulated information and services now draw more attention. The neologism soft power is coined to focus not on technology, which is the agency of circulating information, but on the circulated content of information itself. This new object, content of information, is cultural content, and it is the topic of this dissertation.
In the late 1990s, people globally brought to the fore the economic values and cultural values that cultural product carries, which resulted in a knowledge-based economy and society. They began to consume products stimulating their senses and giving them cultural satisfaction. This new consumption pattern, which reveals the simultaneous, parallel pursuits of psychological satisfaction and material satisfaction, has led to a paradigm shift in industry.
Each country regards cultural content as a new power supply for its growth in the twenty-first century and has established policies related with it. Korea, China, and Japan, which are the examples of comparative research in this dissertation, also join this global trend of making cultural content policy.
Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that the details of policies differ even among countries that share the same backgrounds and goals of policy making. Varied political, economic, social, and historical conditions are factors that intervene with the process of policy making and cause those differences.
This dissertation conducts a comparative study of cultural content policy of each country, from the perspective that policy making on cultural content is influenced by varied culture-specific issues and conditions. To make the comparison more articulate, the countries under study are Korea, China, and Japan, which belong to the same cultural sphere and also have been a community of economic cooperation.
First, the concepts of the term cultural content industry are analyzed and compared to one another; it is called cultural content industry(문화콘텐츠산업) in Korea; cultural and creative industries(文化创意产业) in China; and content industry(コンテンツ産業) in Japan. The different terms reflect that these countries place emphasis on different objectives in the cultural content industry.
Then, the policies on cultural content industry are compared to one another in terms of how the countries understand and view cultural content. They have differences in their contents whereas they have similarities in the period and vision of their appearances, which result from their diverse political, economic, and social conditions. For example, the infrastructure of industry or the ideology of a nation has a significant impact on the content of its policy.
Training policies to develop a workforce also vary depending on the country. Workforce training policies should be considered thoroughly to make cultural industry grow and develop in the long term.
On the basis of the results from the comparative research, this dissertation analyzes from a critical perspective workforce training policies in Korea and suggests an alternative, referring to the counterpart policies of China and Japan. The current policies in Korea should be more far-sighted and constant, and the solution is, therefore, to establish more systematic and acute training policies.
By suggesting the future-oriented perspective, the study is expected to create upcoming changes that are relevant to cultural content industry.


Keywords: cultural content, cultural content policy, cultural content in Korea, China, and Japan, cultural content workforce

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 1
• 1. 연구배경 및 연구목적 1
• 2. 선행연구의 동향 6
• (1) 학위논문 6
• (2) 학술논문 9
• (3) 정책보고서 12
• (4) 한중일의 연구동향 14
• 3. 연구방법 및 연구내용 18
• Ⅱ. 문화콘텐츠 정책과 인력양성정책의 의의 22
• 1. 문화콘텐츠산업 진흥정책의 배경 22
• 2. 문화콘텐츠산업 진흥정책의 범위 28
• (1) 한국 30
• (2) 중국 36
• (3) 일본 42
• 3. 문화콘텐츠 정책에서 인력양성정책이 갖는 의의와 유형 53
• Ⅲ. 한중일 문화콘텐츠 정책의 기조와 특징 61
• 1. 한국의 문화콘텐츠 정책 61
• (1) 기조 61
• (2) 특징 64
• 2. 중국의 문화콘텐츠 정책 68
• (1) 기조 68
• (2) 특징 74
• 3. 일본의 문화콘텐츠 정책 78
• (1) 기조 78
• (2) 특징 81
• 4. 소결 84
• Ⅳ. 한중일 문화콘텐츠 핵심인력 양성정책 및 지원프로그램 90
• 1. 한국의 핵심인력 양성정책 및 지원 프로그램 90
• (1) 인력 양성정책의 기조 90
• (2) 인력양성 기관 93
• (3) 핵심인력 97
• (4) 지원 프로그램 99
• 2. 중국의 핵심인력 양성정책 및 지원 프로그램 101
• (1) 인력 양성정책의 기조 101
• (2) 인력양성 기관 104
• (3) 핵심인력 111
• (4) 지원 프로그램 114
• 3. 일본의 핵심인력 양성정책 및 지원 프로그램 116
• (1) 인력 양성정책의 기조 116
• (2) 인력양성 기관 121
• (3) 핵심인력 127
• (4) 지원 프로그램 129
• 4. 소결 134
• Ⅴ. 한국의 문화콘텐츠 경쟁력 강화를 위한 제언 139
• 1. 현 단계 한국의 문화콘텐츠 인력 양성정책에 대한 비판적 검토 142
• (1) 인력양성정책의 비판적 검토 142
• (2) 인력양성 기관의 인력양성정책 비판적 검토 146
• 2. 한중일 문화콘텐츠 인력 양성정책 비교를 통한 벤치마킹 150
• 3. 한국의 문화콘텐츠 인력양성 정책의 전망과 제언 155
• (1) 인력양성 정책의 전망 155
• (2) 인력양성 정책 제언 161
• Ⅵ. 결론 167
• 1. 연구의 요약 167
• 2. 문화콘텐츠 인력양성 정책비교의 정책적 함의 170
• 참고문헌 173
• Abstract 184