예술작품에서의 도덕적 가치와 미적 가치의 관계 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

ABSTRACT

Works of art can be evaluated from an aesthetic point of view and from a moral one as well. I discuss how moral characteristics that are found within a work of art are surfaced and how they are related to aesthetic characteristics that are found within it, in its creation, deliverance, and appreciation. Questions like "if one were to morally evaluate a work of art, what would his/her evaluation amount to" is to answered in this dissertation. More specially, I discuss how aesthetic value that is found within a work of art is intrinsically related to its moral value, and various views about the relationship between the aesthetic and moral values that are found within a work of art. It is to be discussed as follows.
Chapter 2 investigates the interrelated nature between life and arts in an ever-changing media and art forms. It is to be assumed that art is closely related to human environment, and new media is one such environment. The advent of digital technologies and the development of communication technologies, especially in the direction particular to 21st century as interactive art, certainly give new modes of perception to the artists themselves and their audiences/appreciators provided the assumption. Volatile nature of human identity and life ensued by these new modes of perceiving works of art certainly allows for discussions of various topics in the tradition of humanities.
Chapter 3 discusses the relationship between moral characteristics and aesthetic characteristics that are found in art criticisms, especially within the context of creating works of art and appreciating them. I first note that those characteristics play an important role in the criticisms. I then report the research results, with their limitations, on the nature of the relationship between moral and aesthetic characteristics.
Chapter 4 seeks out an alternative view to the views that I found wanting. My criticism of previous research results, especially the ones found domestically, forces a new direction that is proposed by Gaut. His proposal, it is argued, allows for a more reasonable classification of different views on the issue.
Chapter 5 concludes the dissertation, and it furthers the discussion by considering recent development: immoralism that seems fashionable in the circle of art criticism, and Gaut's contextualism. In the end, I am sympathetic to moralism that is similar to that of Gaut's.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 1
• Ⅱ. 디지털 사회와 예술에 대한 도덕주의 비평 5
• 제 1 절 디지털 사회에서의 예술의 변화와 그 영향에 대한 고찰 5
• 제 2 절 삶과 예술적 가치의 연관에 관하여 15
• Ⅲ. 예술과 도덕: 미적 속성과 도덕적 속성의 내재적 관계에 대한 고찰 22
• 제 1 절 예술과 도덕에 관련된 몇 가지 문제들 23
• 제 2 절 미적 가치와 도덕적 가치의 관계에 대한 선행 연구 분석 29
• Ⅳ. 예술 비평에서의 도덕적 가치와 미적 가치의 체계화에 대한 검토 47
• 제 1 절 캐롤의 “약한 자율주의” 분석 47
• 제 2 절 캐롤의 “약한 도덕주의”의 문제점 52
• 제 3 절 미적-도덕적 가치의 관계에 대한 고오트의 체계화 검토 58
• 1) 미적 연관성 문제 59
• 2) 미적 속성들과 도덕적 속성들의 가치-관계 문제 63
• Ⅴ. 예술 비평의 반도덕주의와 맥락주의에 대한 고찰 71
• 제 1 절 예술 비평의 반도덕주의와 고오트의 제안에 대한 검토 72
• 제 2 절 고오트의 “맥락주의”에 대한 분류와 체계화에 대한 검토 82
• Ⅵ. 결 론 94
• 참고문헌 99
• Abstract 103