The purpose of this study is to figure out the influence of self-esteem, social development, school resilience on the social capital in adolescents.
Self-esteem, social development, school resilience are mentioned as the effect of educational welfare...
The purpose of this study is to figure out the influence of self-esteem, social development, school resilience on the social capital in adolescents.
Self-esteem, social development, school resilience are mentioned as the effect of educational welfare investment priority zone policy.
This paper also compared the difference of the self-esteem, social development, school resilience between the advantaged students and the disadvantaged students.
The Survey for collecting data was conducted from September 15, 2011 to October 15, 2011 targeted the advantaged students and the disadvantaged students in primary and middle school students in Kyonggi-do. 1,198 cases were collected and 1,160 evaluation forms were made use of it.
The study utilized SPSS 12.0 for analysis, and used such statistical methods as descriptive analysis, analysis of item-internal consistency, factor analysis, t-test, analysis of variance, hierarchical multiple regression analysis, and analysis of covariance.
In order to achieve these objectives, the following questions. are raised.
First, is there any statistically meaningful differences in the self-esteem, social development, school resilience between the advantaged students and the disadvantaged students?
Second, is there any statistically meaningful differences in the social capital between the advantaged students and the disadvantaged students?
Third, is there any meaningful differences in need of education welfare program?
Fourth, do affect social self-esteem, self-esteem in family, self-esteem in school. general self-esteem on social capital level?
Fifth, do affect a law-abiding spirit, on social capital level?
Sixth, does affect school resilience on social capital level?
Seventh, which independent factor is the most influential on social capital?
The study utilized SPSS 12.0 for analysis, and used such statistical methods as descriptive analysis, analysis of item-internal consistency, factor analysis, t-test, analysis of variance, hierarchical multiple regression analysis, partial correlation analysis, path analysis, and analysis of covariance.
The results from this research are same as belows:
First, there are meaningful differences in needs of education welfare between the advantaged students and the disadvantaged students. In brief, the advantaged students had more needs on learning support program and after-school-culture program.
Second, self-esteem and school resilience of the disadvantaged students were higher than the advantaged students.
Third, level of trust was higher in the disadvantaged primary school students and in the advantaged middle school students. The level of norms was higher in the advantaged primary school students and in the disadvantaged middle school students. The level of networks was higher in the advantaged students.
Fourth, social self-esteem, self-esteem in family and general self-esteem had positive influence to trust. To norms, social self-esteem and self-esteem in school had positive influence but self-esteem in family had negative influence. Social self-esteem, self-esteem in family and general self-esteem had positive influence to networks but self-esteem in school had negative relation with networks.
Fifth, in the subordinate factors of social development, volunteer tendency, diligence, autonomy had positive influence to trust. and law-abiding, diligence, autonomy, leadership had positive influence to norms. To networks volunteer tendency and diligence had positive influence.
Sixth, school resilience had influence on social capital. In the subordinate factors school attitude had positive influence on trust, school law-abiding and school interest had positive influence on Norms, school attitude had positive influence and school interest had negative influence on networks.
Based on the results of this study, the followings are recommended for further improvement and for the future study.
First, when the program is planed, needs of juvenile should be regarded. The students recognized that after education welfare program depending on educational welfare investment priority zone policy learning and culture programs increased but another fields of programs, for example psychological and emotional support, had no changes.
Second, the level of trust was higher in the disadvantaged students and the influential factors to trust were volunteer tendency, diligence and autonomy. To improve trust of juvenile, it is necessary to encourage that students organize voluntary organization themselves in school.
Third, the influential factors on norms were law-abiding, school-rules observance, leadership, diligence, self-esteem in school, volunteer tendency, autonomy and schol-life interest. it means that internalized rules standards affect norms observance in group. Therefore, more programs through which students learn norms, should be planned.
Fourth, to networks social self-esteem, self-esteem in school, diligence, attitude in school, volunteer tendency had influence. Considering social capital comes from relationships, networks is very important. And it is possible that an individual's overall personality is the main factor in relationship. So, it is necessary to empower juvenile and to give them confidence in themselves.