리비아 시민혁명과 유엔 보호책임(R2P)의 정당성

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Responsibility to protect(R2P) in 2005, passed unanimously in the UN World Summit is a new international norm. The nation does not protect the human rights of the people not to be able, when as the nation is normal act, (genocide and war crimes, ethnic cleansing, crime against humanity) the international community the positive or restrictively must intervene is the contents where the thing is principal.
Jasmin revolution led and democratization of the Middle East wished to swell up, reasoning to be caused by the dictators, the chaff were born long-term from seat of power.
President Mubarak of Egypt, Tunisia, Al-benri President, the representative Gaddafi of Libya and the conservatives in the future dictator of neighboring countries is a threat to the throne.
Specially, case of the Libya different democratization wishes is more special. Because military intervention by the international community because for the first time. Was Gaddafi and in order to intercept the democratization which in order blooms to wish show of force of the populace did the military force oppression which applies a tactics and the escort unit the criticism of the reasoning being caused by international community and bought. The international community does not look away this not to be, ventured an air attack under making a motion of U.N. Security Council summit.
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said, "the first time, armed forces responsible for protecting the first one imported case".
Rebel troops killed by shoting the Gaddafi after the lapse of 8 months. However, military intervention, as well as the Responsibility to Protect(R2P) is the responsibility of rebuilding.
If in future the democratic fixation and the reconstruction where the Libyan mili샴s normal succeed, the Responsibility to Protect is absurd from the hereafter international community and is supported, cannot be like that in compliance with the gain and loss of the powerful country which stares at the case oil which will not be able the sacrificial lamb is a possibility of soaking and the norm which is the possibility of disappearing from criticism inside becomes about other country main hoisting inviolability and does not know.
Dictatorship national Syria which is similar the citizens for a freedom the many bloodshed situation is getting wider, the international community becomes silent. Libya and doctor whom arms intervention will do differently is not visible entirely. Also will be able to apply even in North Korea? Is an agony and reasoning which are the Responsibility to Protect(R2P) to do this essay leads about the intervention authorization which is legitimate and discusses

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 1
• Ⅱ. 유엔 보호책임(R2P)의 이론과 실제 4
• 1. 보호책임 개념의 등장 배경 4
• 2. 원칙과 규범으로서의 보호책임 7
• 3. 개입과 이행으로서의 보호책임 11
• Ⅲ. 리비아 시민혁명과 시리아 민주화 시위 사례 분석 17
• 1. 리비아의 시민혁명 17
• 2. 시리아 민주화 시위 22
• 3. 리비아와 시리아 사례 비교 26
• 4. 기타 중동국가의 민주화 운동 30
• Ⅳ. 유엔의 리비아 개입과 보호책임 이행의 정당성 여부 32
• 1. 보호책임 이행의 정당성 평가 32
• 2. 보호책임 이행의 한계 35
• 3. 북한에 대한 보호책임 적용 가능성 39
• Ⅴ. 결 론 44
• 참고 문헌 46
• ABSTRACT 54
• 부 록 57