수도권 도로건설사업과정의 갈등에 관한 연구 = (A) study on the management conflict of metropolitan road construction

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Even though conflict has been prevalent across the nation, it has not appeared on the surface because economic development has been a top priority during the promotion of the government-led highway development project. Due to the growth of citizenship through globalization, democracy and informatization, however, citizens and NGOs have started to raise their voices in public policies and oppose the government’s one-way policymaking (DAD). As a result, a conflict has occurred. The locals were opposed to the highway construction, and this kind of public resistance was called ‘NIMBY Syndrome.’ Because of the participation of various interested parties, it is very complicated to establish and promote a policy.
First, the government-led highway development project has drawn resistance from interested parties and local residents because of the conventional procedure (DAD: Decide Announce Do) based on economic and scientific rationality just like the Saemaeul Project during the 1970s. Instead of sticking to the conventional method which excludes these people in the decision making, it is necessaryto come up with a new decision-making method which permits the locals’ participation.
Second, social conflict caused by the local government-led highway construction has developed into a rivalry to take over authority and rare resources. As ‘confrontation and conflict’continue without social consent and alternative development & conservation, however, variousdiscontents such as the alternation and discontinuance of the mid & long-term highway construction project have appeared on the surface. In other words, social expenses which occur in the process of rapid economic growth and social development are a phenomenon of social conflict which takes place due to a lack of the infrastructure to prevent and solve this kind of conflict. Because of social avoidance of the highway construction project, conflict among central government, local government, local residents and NGOs has increased. As a result, the government urgently needs to come up with a solution. In terms of a solution of the conflict, this study has classified conflict types by case and set a research hypothesis in order to examine the causes of conflict between central and local governments. In addition, it has attempted to comparatively analyze the progress of each road construction project and the conflict process and solve the problems in the highway development project through a case study on central government-led highway construction projects (Seoul Outer Circular Expressway (Ilsan-Toegyewon), Yongin-Seoul Expressway) and government-led highway construction projects (The 3rd Gyeongin Expressway, the 2ndJayu Expressway). In terms of a solution to the conflict, the following has been proposed: securing budget, expansion of local participation, expert education & training and improvement of law & system. It is also necessaryto perform a feasibility review, hold a session with the locals, secure a budget and provide project-related information. In terms of a solution to the conflict, it appears that a central government-led project would be better than a local government-led project.
In terms of a solution to the conflict between central and local governments, this study proposes to come up with a policy alternative for promotion of the road construction project based on the suggestions from the improvement plan and case study, collect local opinions and have them reflected in the policy, improve laws and systems and secure budget.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제 1 장 서 론 1
• 제1절 연구목적 1
• 제2절 연구의 방법과 범위 3
• 1. 연구의 방법 3
• 2. 연구의 범위 5
• 제 2 장 갈등관리의 이론 및 접근방안 6
• 제1절 갈등의 성격과 관리전략 6
• 1. 갈등의 개념 6
• 2. 갈등발생의 원인 9
• 3. 갈등관리 전략 11
• 제2절 선행연구 검토 15
• 1. 선행연구 분석 15
• 2. 선행연구 시사점 19
• 제3절 갈등유형과 연구가설 21
• 1. 갈등유형별 특성 23
• 2. 연구가설 38
• 제 3 장 도로건설사업 사례분석 39
• 제1절 갈등의 현황 39
• 제2절 서울외곽 순환고속도로(일산～퇴계원) 사례 43
• 1. 사업의 개요 43
• 2. 사업추진 경과 44
• 3. 갈등과정 분석 49
• 제3절 용인～서울고속도로 사례 51
• 1. 사업의 개요 51
• 2. 사업추진 경과 54
• 3. 갈등과정 분석 56
• 제4절 제3경인고속도로 사례 58
• 1. 사업의 개요 58
• 2. 사업추진 경과 59
• 3. 갈등과정 분석 62
• 제5절 제2자유로 사례 63
• 1. 사업의 개요 63
• 2. 사업추진 경과 65
• 3. 갈등과정 분석 68
• 제6절 연구사례의 시사점 69
• 1. 사례 비교 69
• 2. 사례분석의 시사점 71
• 제 4 장 도로건설사업 갈등관리 방안 75
• 제1절 도로건설사업의 갈등관리의 방향 75
• 1. 사업의 투명성 및 객관성 확보 76
• 2. 갈등예방을 위한 예산 확보 76
• 3. 주민참여의 확대 77
• 4. 전문가 양성교육 및 법․제도 개선 80
• 제2절 도로건설사업 갈등관리의 개선과제 81
• 1. 갈등관리 기본법률 제정 81
• 2. 갈등조정기구 운영의 활성화 83
• 3. 중앙과 지방정부간 사무구분체계 개선 94
• 4. 정책결정을 위한 주민의견수렴 94
• 5. 정보교환을 통한 합의 형성 95
• 제 5 장 결론 97
• 참고문헌 101
• 부록 107
• ABSTRACT 109