RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    집합건물 대지의 권리관계에 관한 연구 = (A) study on the rights of aggregate building sites

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12696788

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      용인 : 강남대학교, 2012

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 강남대학교 대학원 , 부동산학과 , 2012

    • 발행연도

      2012

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      321.32 판사항(5)

    • DDC

      333.33 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      경기도

    • 형태사항

      186 p. ; 26 cm

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 175-183

    • 소장기관
      • 강남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Aggregated building refers to one unit building in which structurally separated several parts are used as one separate building and sectional ownership is established for each part.
    Korean legal system regards the site on which a building is constructed and the very building on that site as separated real estate, and the ownership of the building and its site can be separated to many different owners. However, if all the sectional owners of a building do not agree with the use of the site of a aggregate building, the sectional ownership itself can cause problems.
    To cope with this situations, the government enacted 「Act on the ownership and management of aggregate buildings」in 1984, and maintaining up to now. According to this Act, several systems to prevent conflicts of sectional owners of aggregate buildings were established. But legal interpretations based on the Act failed to clarify and solve such a problems that may occur in reality.
    In this regard, this thesis aims to identify several problems that may occur in reality and tries to suggest solutions with law theory between a aggregate building and its site. Of course, many precedents were accumulated since the enforcement the Act and reduced legal disputes, but some disputes described in this thesis are still on the way. The disputes raised in this thesis are as follows:

    Firstly, the division between the statutory site and the site is not clear. In all books, precedents and thesis, the site of a building is referred as the statutory and the site of a aggregate building is referred as the site according to regulations.
    Secondly, a suitable procedure has not been established for aggregate buildings which were constructed before the enforcement of the Act, and this causes problems. That sites should be assigned as the site of an aggregate building according to the regulations.
    Thirdly, the regulations of the Act related to the right to use site and the regulations of the 『Registration of Real Estate Act』related to the right to a site are used mixedly in may theses, and are not clearly separated even in the precedents. This causes confusion.
    Fourthly, it causes conflicts among owners when the share of site co-ownership is not evenly distributed.
    Fifthly, if there is one building the object of sectional ownership belongs to, prohibition of partition of site is needed within the scope required for efficient use of building. In case it has no relationship with efficient use of building, prohibition of partitions of site is not needed
    Sixthly, it is required to examine what is the problem in terms of procedure for registering the site of an aggregate building as well as the definition of the rights to use site and the rights to a site.
    This thesis aims to present the de lege ferenda by identifying and analyzing relationship between an aggregate building and its site using law theories focused on above problems.
    번역하기

    Aggregated building refers to one unit building in which structurally separated several parts are used as one separate building and sectional ownership is established for each part. Korean legal system regards the site on which a building is constru...

    Aggregated building refers to one unit building in which structurally separated several parts are used as one separate building and sectional ownership is established for each part.
    Korean legal system regards the site on which a building is constructed and the very building on that site as separated real estate, and the ownership of the building and its site can be separated to many different owners. However, if all the sectional owners of a building do not agree with the use of the site of a aggregate building, the sectional ownership itself can cause problems.
    To cope with this situations, the government enacted 「Act on the ownership and management of aggregate buildings」in 1984, and maintaining up to now. According to this Act, several systems to prevent conflicts of sectional owners of aggregate buildings were established. But legal interpretations based on the Act failed to clarify and solve such a problems that may occur in reality.
    In this regard, this thesis aims to identify several problems that may occur in reality and tries to suggest solutions with law theory between a aggregate building and its site. Of course, many precedents were accumulated since the enforcement the Act and reduced legal disputes, but some disputes described in this thesis are still on the way. The disputes raised in this thesis are as follows:

    Firstly, the division between the statutory site and the site is not clear. In all books, precedents and thesis, the site of a building is referred as the statutory and the site of a aggregate building is referred as the site according to regulations.
    Secondly, a suitable procedure has not been established for aggregate buildings which were constructed before the enforcement of the Act, and this causes problems. That sites should be assigned as the site of an aggregate building according to the regulations.
    Thirdly, the regulations of the Act related to the right to use site and the regulations of the 『Registration of Real Estate Act』related to the right to a site are used mixedly in may theses, and are not clearly separated even in the precedents. This causes confusion.
    Fourthly, it causes conflicts among owners when the share of site co-ownership is not evenly distributed.
    Fifthly, if there is one building the object of sectional ownership belongs to, prohibition of partition of site is needed within the scope required for efficient use of building. In case it has no relationship with efficient use of building, prohibition of partitions of site is not needed
    Sixthly, it is required to examine what is the problem in terms of procedure for registering the site of an aggregate building as well as the definition of the rights to use site and the rights to a site.
    This thesis aims to present the de lege ferenda by identifying and analyzing relationship between an aggregate building and its site using law theories focused on above problems.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제1절 연구의 목적 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 6
    • 제3절 선행연구 고찰 8
    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제1절 연구의 목적 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 6
    • 제3절 선행연구 고찰 8
    • 제2장 집합건물과 건물의 대지 17
    • 제1절 집합건물의 개념 및 성립 17
    • 1. 집합건물의 개념 17
    • 2. 집합건물의 성립 19
    • 제2절 집합건물의 대지 22
    • 1. 건물과 대지 22
    • 2. 집합건물 대지 26
    • 3. 집합건물 대지의 인정 여부 35
    • 제3장 집합건물의 대지사용권 39
    • 제1절 대지사용권의 개념 39
    • 1. 대지사용권의 성질과 대상 39
    • 2. 대지사용권 성립요건과 시기 52
    • 제2절 전유부분과 대지사용권 55
    • 1. 전유부분과 대지사용권의 일체성 55
    • 2. 일체불가분성의 내용 69
    • 3. 일체불가분성 유지를 위한 기타 수단 79
    • 4. 전유부분에 설정된 저당권과의 관계 83
    • 제3절 대지사용권의 행사 88
    • 1. 대지사용권의 사용․수익권 범위 88
    • 2. 대지사용권 행사와 민법 제263조 98
    • 제4절 대지사용권 분할 119
    • 1. 분할금지의 원칙 119
    • 2. 규약에 의한 분할제한 및 분할시 고려사항 126
    • 제4장 집합건물의 대지권 133
    • 제1절 대지권 의의 및 성립 133
    • 1. 대지권의 의의 133
    • 2. 대지권 성립 134
    • 제2절 대지권등기 138
    • 1. 의의 및 요건 138
    • 2. 대지권등기의 가부 및 기재방법 139
    • 제3절 대지권 취지의 등기 및 변경등기․별도등기 152
    • 1. 대지권 취지의 등기 152
    • 2. 대지권의 변경등기 154
    • 3. 별도등기 163
    • 제5장 결 론 168
    • 제1절 연구요약 168
    • 제2절 법 개정을 위한 제언 165
    • 제3절 연구의 한계와 향후 과제 168
    • 참 고 문 헌 175
    • Abstract 184
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼