This study used convenience sampling of 198 soccer players in middle and high school in Seoul and Incheon City to examine the effects of middle and high school soccer coaches' servant leadership on mutual trust. And, the conclusion is as follows.
F...
This study used convenience sampling of 198 soccer players in middle and high school in Seoul and Incheon City to examine the effects of middle and high school soccer coaches' servant leadership on mutual trust. And, the conclusion is as follows.
First, is the analysis based on the soccer players' personal characteristics. In servant leadership behave characteristic, with the average rating of 3.32, the factor of 'membership formation' recorded 3.57, 'sympathy' 3.53, 'vision suggestion' 3.47, and 'recognition' 3.11, the lowest. In mutual trust behave characteristic, with the average rating of 3.29, the factor of 'loyalty,' which recorded 3.67, was the highest.
Second, according to the statistical results on the population of soccer players, there proved to be partially notable differences in servant leadership. Thus, prize record is the difference 1) 4 times, and 2 -3 times, and 2) one time. But, age athletic career and leader coaching term is not difference.
Third, according to the statistical results on the population of soccer players, there was no certain difference in mutual trust level.
Fourth, among the factors that influence the relationship between soccer coaches' servant leadership and mutual trust, the factor of 'sympathy & vision suggestion' (p<.001, r=.438) proved to be the highest, and that of 'attention & sympathy' (p<.01, r=.365) and 'player development & vision suggestion' (p<.01, r=.365) the next highest.
Fifth, there proved to be a notable difference in the relationship between the coaches' servant leadership and mutual trust. That is, the factor of 'persuasion' (p<.001, t=3.938) in servant leadership suggests that guidance through persuasion rather than oppressive imperative improves the mutual trust level.