This study suggests the process for sludge reduction using a combined pretreatment of alkali and ozone and crystallization techniques for removing and recovering the ammonium and ortho phosphate ion from the solubilized sludge as struvite and apatite....
This study suggests the process for sludge reduction using a combined pretreatment of alkali and ozone and crystallization techniques for removing and recovering the ammonium and ortho phosphate ion from the solubilized sludge as struvite and apatite. Also, this process can supply the solubilized sludge as an external carbon source into the biological nutrient removal process to improve the water quality of effluent.
There are three stages to achieve the above objective. The first step is to investigate the lab-scale pretreatment processes for sludge reduction and solubilization under the batch operation. The artificial wastewater was used to evaluate the factors affecting crystallization of struvite and apatite. Also, the products(solubilized sludge) of the pretreatment processes were examined as an external carbon source for the biological nutrient removal process using the NUR(nitrate utilization rate) test. The second step is to investigate the pilot-scale pretreatment processes for sludge reduction and solubilization connected with KSMBR(K-water, Ssangyong and KMS membrane bio-reactor) under the continuous-flow operation. The pilot test was carried out to find an optimal condition for improving the efficiencies of crystallization of struvite and apatite in the real excess sludge. Based on the results of previous study, in the third step, a full scale operation of the process for sludge reduction was implemented. The P release reactor and fermenter were added to improve the crystallizing efficiency in front of the process, while KSMBR was installed to guarantee the effluent water quality in the rear of the process. Through the continuous operation, the feasibility and the stability of proposed process were evaluated.
In the first step of this study, the combined pretreatment method of alkali and ozone(pH 11 + 0.32 gO3/gSS) showed highest efficiency of sludge reduction and solubility among the combined pretreatment methods except combined pretreatment of alkali and ozone(pH 11 + 0.32 gO3/gSS + pH 11). Using this combined pretreatment method, 35.6% of reduction efficiency(TSS), 41.8% of solubilization efficiency, 73.5% of rbCOD(readily biodegradable COD) and 6.5 mgNO3--Ng/MLVSS․hr of SDNR(specific denitrification rate) were achieved. Consequently, combined pretreatment of alkali and ozone(pH 11 + 0.32 gO3/gSS) was selected, as it had been relatively high reduction and solubilization efficiency and optimum method for the continuous-flow operation. Struvite was effectively crystallized at the molar ratio of 1.4:1:1(Mg2+:NH4+:PO43-) and pH of 9.6. Apatite was effectively crystallized at the molar ratio of 1:1(Ca2+:PO43-) and over pH of 8.9.
In the second step of this study, when the P release reactor was added in front of the process for sludge reduction, the concentration of AHP(acid hydrolyzable phosphorus) was slightly reduced, while the concentration of PO43- in STP(soluble TP) was dramatically increased. When the fermenter was added in front of the process for sludge reduction, VFA(volatile fatty acid) concentration in SCOD of solubilized sludge was increased by 2 times. In addition, when KSMBR of 5 m3/d was installed and connected with the process for sludge reduction, the removal efficiency of the total nitrogen was improved up to 60%. In the case of crystallization, struvite was not properly formated with the solubilized sludge. However, apatite was effectively crystallized at the molar ratio of 4:1(Ca2+:PO43-) and pH of 9.6 ~ 10.0. Through the apatite crystallization, 94.3% of PO43- was removed from the solubilized sludge. At a feasibility test for the sludge solubilized as a fertilizer, struvite and apatite crystallized from the excess sludge of KSMBR process, D city and J county fell short of the salinity standard of the Rural Development Administration and Ministry of Environment. On the other hand, they met the standards in terms of all other heavy metals. As the struvite and apatite obtained from KSMBR had about 30 % of P2O5, they can be considered as a raw material for phosphorous fertilizer.
In the last step, when the full scale process for sludge reduction was continuously operated for 5 months, the average efficiencies of sludge reduction and solubility were 35% and 20.4%, respectively. When the KSMBR process was connected in the rear of the process for sludge reduction, the removal efficiency of the total phosphorus was improved up to 40%. In the result of economic feasibility analysis, the cost of operating and maintenance on the process for sludge reduction was 12,550 KRW(Korea Won)/㎥. At the 4,654 KRW/㎥ of dewatering cost and more than 55,500 KRW/㎥ of incineration cost, KSMBR process-process for sludge reduction-mechanical dewatering-incineration is more economical than BNR(biological nutrient removal) process-mechanical dewatering-incineration. Therefore, the suggested process for sludge reduction would have competitive price for the effective sludge treatment.