In this study, characteristics of outside directors discretionary accruals and the actual impact on earnings and stock price reaction is analyzed. For this study, the independence and mobility as a proxy measure of each of them, then two proxies and d...
In this study, characteristics of outside directors discretionary accruals and the actual impact on earnings and stock price reaction is analyzed. For this study, the independence and mobility as a proxy measure of each of them, then two proxies and discretionary accruals measured by modified Jones model and Roychowdhury (2006) used in the study measured the actual relevance of earnings model by analyzing the characteristics of directors of the company to accruals and real earnings management affects were analyzed. In addition, these two proxies and the cumulative abnormal return(CAR) Director characteristics and analyze their relevance to the relationship between stock price reaction was analyzed. In addition, these two proxies and the cumulative abnormal return(CAR) Director characteristics and analyze their relevance to the relationship between stock price reaction was analyzed.
As a result, outside directors on the characteristics of the measured and the modified Jones model discretionary accruals did not show significant results only. Directors characteristics and the absolute value of discretionary accruals by modified Jones model of the association between the results for the regression analysis, a regression analysis to target the entire sample, such as the expected sign negative (-) of the regression coefficients were observed significantly did not. This ‘hypothesis 1’ was rejected. However, based on assets of 2 trillion won in the sample, separated by a regression analysis of the assets of two trillion won or more outside directors from a sample of companies active variables measured and a significant negative discretionary accruals (-) indicates the relevance of, by Outside of the corporate earnings characteristics and a significant negative (-) shows the relevance of the results are consistent with the existing research that shows the result. And outside properties and Roychowdhury (2006) used in the study of relation between actual earnings measures regression analysis results, decreased proportion of outside directors for companies in a regression analysis, abnormal operating cash flow (abCFO) and abnormal retained earnings (abPROD) as well as the results of previous studies, significant negative (-) and positive (+) of the regression coefficients were observed. However, abnormal discretionary expenses (abDE) the results of previous studies, such as negative (-) of the regression coefficients were observed were not significant. but increased proportion of outside directors for companies in a regression analysis, the independence of outside directors to increase the sample of companies as opposed to a regression analysis showed a sign of the regression coefficient, its operating cash flow of the abnormal and abnormal discretionary expenses Each of the 10% level was significant at 1% level. Also decreased activity for the firm a regression analysis, decreased activity directors for companies in an abnormal operating cash flow analysis (abCFO) and abnormal reconstruction (abPROD), significant in the negative (-) and positive (+) by showing the regression coefficients, decreasing abnormal activity outside the operating cash flow and real earnings in the abnormal portion of manufacturing costs were found to have occurred. This increased activity outside the target company in a regression analysis, abnormal and abnormal discretionary expenses to cost a significant negative (-) of the regression coefficient was a bold prediction of them as opposed to abnormal discretionary expenses by showing the results of Outside of the active part of the abnormal discretionary expenses that were not properly affect. Finally, the relevance of directors characteristics and stock price reaction to verify the regression analysis, we found that the ratio of outside directors and outside directors attribute variable activity variables and cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) between the both results were not statistically significant. Outside the ratio between variable and the cumulative excess return hypothesis, as positive (+) but showed a regression coefficient was not statistically significant, and the cumulative excess return variables outside activity between the negative (-) of the regression coefficients were observed were not significant. This ‘hypothesis 3’ was rejected.
These findings have increased the role of outside directors reduces corporate earnings, Klein (2002) and Lee, Sang, Kyung Tae Lee (2003) presented the results of previous studies by different research may provide implications for. In addition, previous studies related to directors of companies with respect to earnings, as measured by modified Jones model discretionary accruals than those measured by considering only the present study, the discretionary accruals measured by modified Jones model and Roychowdhury (2006) used in the study of measured by actual earnings using both models by analyzing the suitability and reliability of the results was to increase the scope of the study was extended. This research institutions outside the regulatory authorities to improve and as a result of an informative study is expected to be provided.