도시개발에 있어서 법정계획의 한계와 비법정계획의 필요성에 관한 연구 : 기반시설 확보를 중심으로 = A Study on Limitations of Legal Planning and Necessity of non-Legal Planning In Urban Development

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In small scale projects such as individual construction project, the infrastructure construction has been avoided or only that for related project site has been established through point development by free riding ambient large scale projects while that for the project site has been intentionally and efficiently due to similar project times in large scale project such as residential area development So, thoughtless development happens and intentional infrastructure is not established in the former case.
Thoughtless development is defined as insufficient public infrastructure such as road, water-sewer system, and school by the development not to consider the capacity of infrastructure of in the area and chaotic buildings by unintentional development. The judgement criterion is whether the infrastructure was constructed intentionally.
Like this, the intentional construction and establishment of infrastructure is very important. Thus, the contents related to the infrastructure establishment are specified on the determination and notification of urban planning facilities by urban fundamental planning and management planning on 「law on territory planning and use」and individual laws such as 「city development law」,「law for development promotion of residential area」and its intentional construction is promoted through various institutions such as development action permission and infrastructure area. However, the problems of infringement on private ownership and civil complaints caused by long-term non-operated facilities with determination of excessive city planning facilities, inexperienced operation of institutions such as development action permission and infrastructure area and chaotic legal system require other different solutions.
Infrastructure usually has difference between planning and construction time and is planned to secure land before it is constructed in need. Though the plan is best made by the public or established by the legal planning to prevent thoughtless development, the problem of longer time, excessive cost, and insufficient administration capacity arise.
Thus, for the prevention of thoughtless development, the infrastructure establishment is needed fundamentally, but some solutions are required since intentional infrastructure by present legal planning is hard to achieve and limited and non-legal planning should be introduced.
Non-legal planning is a sort of the notion of pre-legalization without binding or framework and control procedures before the legalization, Even though it could not determine infrastructure as urban planning facilities by city management plan because of execution problem of the budget, it means the plan to lead flexible and strategical planing, constructing and developing infrastructure other than legal planning considering concern about thoughtless development and the necessity of intentional infrastructure needed,
The research results on 5 examples to attempt to establish the infrastructure by it are that they established infrastructure by the negotiation with businesses only with the preliminary plan of infrastructure and are introduced to prevent long-term non-operating facilities and respond quickly to environmental changes free of execution of the budget. Especially, they show that the speedy negotiations with businesses were made in progress in non-legal planning oriented projects such as Mangpo garden in Suwon-si, inter-village road within Hwasung green belt, and roads in Hwasung planned build-up area, and infrastructure was constructed without serious problems within the harmonized mutual interests.
Like this, it could be used temporarily in the area which infrastructure is not determined as legal facilities due to lack budget despite necessity of intentional infrastructure facilities before the advent of development pressure. As in the case of Rahmen plan in Germany as a supplementary means for limitations of the legal planning if the non-legal planning with related contents sharing and planning improvements and making among politicians, government officials, businesses, and citizens is executed, better urban planning and ifrastructure establishment would be available.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 1
• 1) 연구의 배경 1
• 2) 연구의 목적 3
• 2. 연구방법 및 내용 4
• 1) 용어정의 4
• 2) 연구의 방법 5
• 3) 연구의 내용 5
• Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰 6
• 1. 기반시설의 개요 및 관련 법.제도 고찰 6
• 1) 기반시설의 정의 6
• 2) 기반시설의 종류 6
• 3) 기반시설 관련 법 9
• 4) 기반시설 관련 제도 12
• 2. 난개발의 개념 16
• 3. 도시기반시설 확보방식에 대한 고찰 18
• 1) 도시기반시설 확보의 일반적 과정 18
• 2) 도시기반시설 확보방식의 개념 19
• 4. 독일의 비법정 계획 라멘플란(Rahmenplan) 19
• 1) 독일의 도시계획 체계 20
• 2) 라멘플란의 정의 23
• 3) 라멘플란의 생성배경 26
• 4) 라멘플란의 기능 27
• 5) 비법정계획의 정의 29
• Ⅲ. 법정 계획의 문제점 및 한계 32
• 1. 도시기본계획과 도시관리계획간의 공백 32
• 1) 도시기본계획 32
• 2) 도시관리계획 33
• 3) 도시기본계획과 도시관리계획 사이의 공백 33
• 2. 도시계획시설 결정에 의한 장기 미집행 시설의 발생 34
• 1) 도시계획시설의 개념 34
• 2) 도시계획시설의 필요성 및 설치 36
• 3) 장기 미집행 도시계획시설의 개념 37
• 4) 장기 미집행 도시계획시설의 현황 38
• 5) 장기 미집행 도시계획시설의 발생원인 및 문제점 41
• 3. 개발행위허가제의 연접제한 43
• 1) 개발행위허가제의 정의 및 특징 43
• 2) 연접제한의 정의 43
• 3) 개발행위허가제 연접제한의 문제 44
• 4. 기반시설부담구역 제도의 잦은 변화와 시간.비용 장기화 45
• 1) 기반시설부담구역 제도의 변천 45
• 2) 기반시설부담구역 제도의 문제점 47
• 5. 소결 48
• Ⅳ. 비법정 계획의 유형별 분석 및 필요성 51
• 1. 수원시 망포동 지구단위계획 52
• 1) 수원시 망포동 지구단위계획의 개요 52
• 2) 비법정 계획의 내용 및 특징 53
• 2. 대전 서남부 생활권 신시가지 개발사업 57
• 1) 서남부 생활권 개발계획 도입배경 57
• 2) 서남부 생활권 개발계획 범위 및 성격 57
• 3) 서남부 생활권 개발계획 내용 59
• 4) 비법정 계획의 내용 및 특징 60
• 3. 서울시 도시환경정비사업(구 도심재개발사업) 65
• 1) 도시환경정비사업의 도입배경 65
• 2) 도시환경정비사업의 개요 및 추진현황 67
• 3) 완료구역의 계획도면과 실제 비교 72
• 4) 비법정 계획의 내용 및 특징 80
• 4. 화성시 매송 기반시설부담구역 84
• 1) 매송 기반시설부담계획 도입배경 84
• 2) 매송 기반시설부담계획 개요 85
• 3) 비법정 계획의 내용 및 특징 86
• 5. 화성시 반월동, 병점동 일원 시가화예정용지 91
• 1) 시가화예정용지의 정의 91
• 2) 시가화예정용지의 개요 93
• 3) 비법정 계획의 내용 및 특징 94
• 6. 소결 97
• Ⅴ. 결론 103
• 1. 연구종합 및 시사점 103
• 2. 연구의 한계 106
• 참고문헌 107
• ABSTRACT 110