While it originated in a crisis financial from the United States, and Korean economy get a large blow with international match deterioration, so an employment market suddenly turned worse. Companies groped for a lot of strategic ways in order to break...
While it originated in a crisis financial from the United States, and Korean economy get a large blow with international match deterioration, so an employment market suddenly turned worse. Companies groped for a lot of strategic ways in order to break a crisis. And then regarding human resources, appeared than a new employees on a manpower issue so that phenomenon to prefer a career employees. University students are impending in front of the labor markets more disadvantageous to a new employee and they are difficult of the selection that shall decide on the courses and work between own hope course and the uneasy labor markets.
The university student times form character as adults, and it is the important times affecting to decide on quality of general assignment accomplishment and mutual relation of life. Super(1990) said that it was important very that university students belong to in the latter period adolescence and in the former adulthood, decided on in person own course by themselves. Nevertheless they don't solve these situations by aggressive effort, and evade course decision and graduation.
Specially, the case issue of an indecisive university student is more serious.
Research this analyze an indecisiveness level of an university student and factors to strengthen indecisiveness of an university students.
This Research executed questionnaire to 546 people included four universities students and three colleges students located in Seoul and Kyuggido. All data collected in order to verify a hypothesis used SPSSWIN 12.0 program and executed frequency analysis, factors analysis, reliability analysis, indepent-samlpes t-test, one-way ANOVA, correlation relational analysis by this program. the results of research is as follows.
Firstly it was confirmed to things with differences to an indecisiveness level according to personal characteristics of an university student. the indecisiveness level showed a difference in and dysfunction of a decision process according to sex, also the difference along a school year the results were verified in dysfunction of a decision process and at uncertainty regarding decision, showed difference regarding decision according to major systems.
Secondly It appeared to things with differences of factors to strengthen indecisiveness according to personal characteristics of an university students also appeared to things with differences in fear regarding failure, perfectionism, influences of an important other people according to sex. Besides school year and major systems were turned down. Thirdly, a difference verified It at factors degree to strengthen indecisiveness according to indecisiveness levels of the university students. As result of it, there was a difference in the group who high group and low group regarding indecisiveness level.
An uncertainty regarding decision was high about fear regarding failure, perfectionism, evasion of process trouble, and versatility, an influence of an important other people and so on. The results of analysis that a dysfunction of a decision process level is high and low group regarding decision level were given high at the fear regarding failure, a process trouble evasion, and an important other people. As a result of having compared a difference between groups in decision evasion levels, a difference was verified in fear regarding failure and process trouble evasion and an influences of other people.
Fourthly, verified a hypothesis that there will be correlation with factors to strengthen an indecisiveness level of an university student and indecisiveness. The results that analyzed correlation of factors to strengthen an indecisiveness group and each indecisiveness group, it was verified that there is correlation with a group of high level of uncertainty regarding decision, fear regarding failure, a process trouble evasion, and an influence of an important other people.
In conclusion, there was a difference to factors to strengthen indecisiveness levels and indecisiveness according to personal characteristics of an university students, and verified that there was a difference in a degree of factors to strengthen indecisiveness by indecisiveness levels.
Also, The results of analysis that verified correlation between an indecisiveness group and factors to strengthen indecisiveness, an indecisive university students appears in uncertainty levels of decision. Therefore we have to pay attention to results of this research that there was a fear regarding failure and process trouble evasion, an influence of an important other people and correlation.