영·유아권리에 대한 보육교사인식에 관한 연구 : 부천시, 광명시, 시흥시를 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In modern capitalist society we misunderstand that material is more important than human right, and we often watch some cases human right and dignity are neglected. Since Korea entered into industrial society, the number of working woman has rapidly increased, and then, so does the number of educare facility. Due to the change of family structure, women are not full responsible for nursing children, but nation and community should take the duty of nursing through educare facility. It is important for the educare teachers who work in field and communicate directly or indirectly with infant and baby to have right value, attitude and perception about the right of infant and baby. By surveying their perception on infant and baby, therefore, they need to think seriously how the infant and baby who should be the subject of right enjoy it in the educare field.
The population of the study is the teachers of educare facilities across the country, however, for the convenience of study, teachers in active service working in educare facilities in the cities of Bucheon, Gwangmyoung and Siheung. were chosen. research tool is the 4 scale measurement amended from the sheet by Jiyoun Shin, Sejin Kim and Seungae Hong, a study about educare teachers' perception on the right of infant and baby. The data collected was analysed by the computer statistics program SPSS 12.0. To understand general result through the standard deviation and standard error, descriptive statistics and Frequency were implemented; to understand the relation between background characteristics and dependent variables, Chi-squre test was implemented; and to verify the difference between perception and practice of educare teacher, t-test and ANOVA posterior analysis were implemented.
By examining the background of teachers in terms of sociology of population, relation between job satisfaction and understanding on right, and real condition the infant and baby could enjoy their right in facility, present study tried to serve a fundamental practical data necessary to increase teacher's sensibility about the right. The results are as follows:
First, while the teachers perceived highly on the importance of right of infant and baby, the degree to enjoy it was rather lower.
Second, job satisfaction of the educare teachers according to age showed no significant difference, and they were satisfied with their job in general.
Third, while job satisfaction of the educare teachers according to educational career showed no significant difference, those who were attending or finished graduate school were satisfied with their job in general; that is, the more they got academic career, the higher they were satisfied with their job.
Fourth, job satisfaction of the educare teachers according to speciality showed significant difference, and those who had majored in social welfare were supremely satisfied..
Fifth, job satisfaction of the educare teachers according to the type of facility showed significant difference. Since teachers working in supporting facility showed high satisfaction, it seemed that the working environment and condition of private facility should be improved.
Sixth, job satisfaction of the educare teachers according to job location showed significant difference, and those who had majored in social welfare were supremely satisfied; teachers in Bucheon were supremely satisfied. Seventh, relationship between job satisfaction of the educare teachers and their concern about the right of infant and baby showed significant difference. The more they satisfied with their job, the more they got interest in the right.
Eighth, relationship between job satisfaction of the educare teachers and their opinion on "infant and baby are the subjects of right" showed significant difference. The more they satisfied with their job, the more they perceived it seriously.
Ninth, as for the teachers' perception on the right according to their background, the teachers' perception on the importance of right of infant and baby according to age showed no significant difference, and those who were under 30 perceived it highly. And the degree of possession and exertion of the right showed significant difference; the infant and baby with educare teachers who were under 30 exerted it actively.
Tenth, while the teachers' perception on the importance of right of infant and baby according to educational career showed no significant difference, those who had finished graduate school perceived it highly. On the other hand, as for the exertion of right of infant and baby, there were significant differences according to educational career of teaches. Teachers who graduated college were more active in making the infant and baby exert their right.
Eleventh, the teachers' perception on the importance of right of infant and baby according to speciality showed significant difference; those who those who had majored in social welfare perceived it highly.
Twelfth, the teachers' perception on the importance of right of infant and baby according to the type of facility showed no significant difference. On the other hand, as for the exertion of right of infant and baby, there were significant differences according to the type of facility teaches worked actually. The infant and baby in public or in-company facility were higher than those in private facility.
s. Teachers who Since teachers working in supporting facility showed high satisfaction, it seemed that the working environment and condition of private facility should be improved.according to speciality showed significant difference; those who those who had majored in social welfare perceived it highly.
And thirteenth, the teachers' perception on the importance of right of infant and baby according to job location showed significant difference, and those who were in Bucheon were supremely exerting.
In conclusion, there seems to be some relation between the teachers' perception on the importance of right of infant and ba

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = 1
• 표차례 = 3
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 4
• 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 4
• 2. 연구 문제 = 8
• 3. 연구 가설 = 8
• 4. 연구의 제한 = 10
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 11
• 1. 아동 권리에 대한 고찰 = 11
• 1) 아동의 정의 = 11
• 2) 권리의 의미 = 12
• 3) 아동 권리의 발달 과정 = 13
• 4) 아동 권리론 = 17
• 2. 아동권리에 관한 국제법과 국내법 = 19
• 1) 아동권리 협약(Convention on the Rights of the Child) = 20
• 2) 영유아보육법 = 23
• 3) 보육시설 평가인증제도 및 영·유아의 권리 = 28
• 3. 선행연구 = 35
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 37
• 1. 연구 대상 및 표집방법 = 37
• 2. 조사도구 = 37
• 3. 자료 분석 방법 = 38
• Ⅳ. 조사결과 분석 = 38
• 1. 조사대상자의 일반적인 특성 = 38
• 2. 보육교사의 영·유아권리의 중요성 인식과 영·유아권리 소유행사 정도 = 41
• 3. 보육교사의 영·유아권리의식에 관한 조사결과 = 42
• 1) 보육교사의 영·유아인권에 대한 관심 = 42
• 2) 보육교사의 아동권리협약에 대한인지 정도 = 42
• 3) 보육교사들의 권리교육을 받은 유무 = 43
• 4) 보육교사들의 권리교육의 필요성 인식 = 44
• 5) 권리교육의 적절한 시기 = 44
• 6) 현재 보육교사의 근무만족 정도 = 45
• 7) 보육교사가 인식한 ‘영·유아는 권리의 주체자이다.’에 대한 중요성인식 = 46
• 4. 보육교사의 영·유아권리인식에 대한 차이 비교분석 = 47 1) 보육교사의 인구사회학적 배경과 근무만족과의 관계 = 47
• 2) 보육교사의 근무만족과 영·유아권리 인식과의 관계 = 52
• 3) 보육교사의 영·유아권리인식과 영·유아권리 행사와의 관계 = 54
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 59
• 1. 결론 = 59
• 2. 제언 = 63
• 참고문헌 = 66
• 부록 = 69
• ABSTRACT = 78