韓國國會 請願制度와 그 改善方案에 관한 硏究 = A Study on Petition System of the Korean National Assembly and it's Improving Measure

국문 초록 (Abstract)

民主國家에 있어서 議會政治의 窮極的인 目標는 國民의 權利保護이고, 議會政治가 國民의 權利請願으로 비롯되었음을 @@案할 때 國民의 意思는 결코 民主政治上 無視할 수 없는 要素이다.
그러므로 議會는 院內에서 活潑한 討論을 通해 民意를 收@하는 한편, 請願을 通하여 國民與論과 接觸하게 되는 것이다.
國民의 소리이기도한 이 請願이 制憲國會이래 現在까지 政府나 國會에 상당수 接受하고도 그 處理實績은 보잘것 없고, 더구나 새로운 正義에의 接近을 그 目標로 삼았던 第 11代國會의 경우 總 276件의 請願을 接受하여 不過 2件만이 採擇되었다는 것은 爲政者나 國會 모두가 請願制度에 관한 認識을 새롭게 하고 좀더 效率的으로 運營되도록 積極的인 改善方案이 要請되는 것이다.
이에 本論文에서는 第1章 序論에 이어 第2章에서는 國會請願制度의 特性 및 發展過程, 그리고 主要國家들의 請願制度와 韓國의 國會請願制度를 함께 考察함으로써 서로의 長短點을 比較해 보게된다.
第3章에서는 韓國의 國會請願制度의 實際的運營實態를 ①提出背景 ②接受 ③處理 ④處理結果 順으로 나누어 分析한 後 다음과 같은 問題點들을 導出하게 된다.
(1) 請願 節次上의 不利益과 複雜性.
(2) 審査過程에 대한 請願人의 不滿.
(3) 請願制度 運營의 公正性과 @@當性.
(4) 請願制度의 實效性 確保問題.
(5) 提出件數의 增加와 處理의 未洽
(6) 請願事項의 事實調査, 現地確認의 未洽
(7) 請願處理制의 地方擴散問題
이러한 分析結果를 바탕으로 해서 制4章에서는 國會請願制度의 改善方案으로 現行制度運營上의 改善方案과 새로운 制度의 導入問題로 區分하여 다음과 같이 提示하게 된다.
1. 現行 請願制度 運營上의 改善方案
1) 請願의 積極的인 發掘
(1) 陳情의 請願化 誘導
(2) 請願의 積極的 誘導와 紹介의 ??重
(3) 政黨의 請願活動 强化
(4) 請願處理 比率의 提高
2) 請願審査活動의 强化
(1) 常設 請願審査小委員會 設置
(2) 紹介議員의 活動
(3) 處理節次의 壓縮？@@速化.
(4) 公正한 審査
(5) 實質的 審査
(6) @@, 意見陳述의 機會賦與
(7) 自動産業의 止揚
3) 請願處理結果의 活用策
(1) 處理結果의 拘束力 賦與
(2) 採擇된 請願의 議案化 誘導
(3) 處理結果와 事後報告制度의 連結
2. 새로운 制度의 導入
1) 請願專擔機構의 設置
2) 옴부즈만(Ombudsman) 制度
3) 地方請願審査委員會
이상의 硏究結果를 가지고 第5章에서는 結論을 내리게 된다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Ultimate target of the parliamentary politics in democratic nation is the safeguard of right of a nation, and opinion of the people is a constituent that can in no way be negligible on democratic politics when we take into consi deration that the parliamentary politics was originated by the petition of peo ple's right.
There fore the National Assembly shall contact with the peoples opinion through petition as well as examine the will of the people through active dis cussion in the assembly.
Until this time since the Constituent National Assembly, despite receiving considerable number of the petitions which is talk of the people by the gover nment and the National Assembly the result of settlement is worthless, more over while receiving 276 cases of petitions by the 11th National Assembly which was aimed at approachment for a new justice has admitted on two (2) cases. Due to the fact as stated above, it is requested that all of the admini strators and the national assembly should renovate the recognition for the pe tition system and establish positive improving measures so as to make effective administration.
In this thesis, compared the merits and demerits through instruction in Chapter 1, characteristics and the petition system for the National Assembly in Chapter 2 and through examination of the petition system of the major countries in the world as well as our petition system of the National Assembly.
In Chapter 3, examined the practical administrating status of the petition system of our National Assembly such as (1) Background for submit, (2) Re ceiving, (3) Settlement, (4) Results of action then picked up the following problems upon analysis:
(1) Disadvantage and complexity on the petition process.
(2) Complaints of the requestor for the examination course.
(3) Fairness and propriety for the administration of the petition system.
(4) Securing problem of effectiveness of the petition system.
(5) Unsatisfactory settlement and increasement of the cases submitted.
(6) Insufficient survey of the fact and site confirmation for the matters petitioned.
(7) Problems for diffusion to the local districts for the settlement system of the petitions.
With the basis of such a analysis results, suggested as indicated below below dividing into the current administration of the system for the petition system of the National Assembly and improving measure and inducement of new system:
1. Improving measures in administration of the current petition system:
1) Positive scout of the petition.
(1) Inducement of the petition.
(2) Positive inducement and prudence in introduction of the petition.
(3) Strengthening petition activities of the political parties.
(4) Calling for the higher ratio of the petition settlement.
2) Strenghthening of the examination activities for petition.
(1) Establishment of permenent subcommittee for the examination of petition.
(2) Activation of the recommended assembly man.
(3) Pressed and rapid disposition of the settling procedure.
(4) Fair examination.
(5) Substantial examination.
(6) Endowment of chances to hearing and mentioning opinion.
(7) Sublating automatic disuse.
3) Utilization measure of the settlement results of the petition.
(1) Endowment of right of restriction for the results.
(2) Inducement to make as a bill to the assembly for the ado pted petition.
(3) Connection of the settled results and reporting system later.
2. Inducement of new system.
(1) Establishment of the organization in charge of
(2) Ombudsman system
(3) Examination committee in the district.
Conclusion has been made in Capter 5 with the above result of study.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = ⅰ
• 第1章 序論 = 1
• 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
• 第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 = 4
• 第2章 國會의 請願制度 = 8
• 第1節 國會請願制度의 特性 및 發展過程 = 8
• 第2節 各國의 國會請願制度 = 25
• 第3節 韓圍의 國會請願制度 = 44
• 第3章 國會請願制度의 實際的運營實態와 問題點 分析 = 54
• 第1節 分析의 意義와 方法 = 54
• 第2節 請願提出의 背景實態 = 56
• 第3節 請願의 接受實態 = 58
• 第4節 請願의 處理實態 = 66
• 第5節 請願의 處理結果實態 = 85
• 第6節 現行 請願制度運營上의 問題點 = 94
• 第4章 國會請願制度의 改善方案 = 103
• 第1節 序言 = 103
• 第2節 現行 請願制度運營上의 改善方案 = 104
• 第3節 새로운制度의 導入 = 116
• 第5章 結論 = 128
• 參考文獻 = 135
• 國文抄錄 = 140
• 英文抄錄 = 143