주민참여수준 진단 및 활성화방안에 관한 연구 = Participation level of residents diagnosed And research on active measures

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

If it is assumed that activation of residents participation is essential for development of the local autonomy, residents participation may have dual aspects : Basically, residents tend to approach the government to have their needs fulfilled egoistically, while the bureaucracy is required to meet the residents for a smooth administration. Then, the two aspects may conflict with each other. Accordingly, if both local administration and its residents do not give up their egoism, a desirable residents participation may not be feasible, much less its efficiency.
This study aims at presenting an activation plan of residents direct participation system by analyzing an important factor that the residents participation affects the progress of local autonomy and importance of residents participation with respect to local autonomy. In the realities that any legal, systematic residents participation system has not been arranged yet, it may be difficult for such direct participation system of the residents to be activated, but the author thinks that the best option to solve the local outstanding questions is a way to find out a plan which can meet the desires of the local residents to its maximum.
The ultimate and final aim of establishing local self-government is improve the quality of lives of the residents. It is believed that the quality of life improves when the local residents are empowered to decide the details on their own for themselves. This is why residents should actively participate in governing. It is the administration of the local governments to which the average residents may exercise limited participation.
Residents organizations can intermediate between residents and local administrations to encourage residents to participate in policy making processes, while exerting a great socio-political influence. Recently, some residents organizations have been successful in forming public opinions on environmental and traffic issues. Despite residents organization are playing such important roles for residents participation, their activities have been restricted by limited financial subsidies. Thus, in order to promote residents organizations on a continual basis, it is deemed necessary to increase financial subsidies to them, while setting some directions for their activities. In particular, it is important to encourage them to suggest policy alternatives and develop some strategies to develop action programs allowing people to participate therein.
In the residents government and the participatory government, decentralization policy obtained good results in the level of more broader balanced local development. Furthermore, the administration system and residents awareness has been greatly developed in the course of setting these results in the basic framework of democracy of self-government.
In conclusion the success of local autonomy depends on how well residents participate in public administration. In order to secure the success, various participating channels should be made and residents should really participate in public administration. The study tries to find solutions with such elements of local administration as administrative surroundings, administrative systems, and residents as key variables. The solutions will be found effectively and efficiently only when local self-governing bodies and their residents work together in harmony.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
• 제 1 장 서론 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 1
• 제1절 연구의 목적 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 1
• 제2절 연구범위 및 연구방법‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 2
• 제 2 장 주민참여에 관한 이론 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 3
• 제1절 주민참여의 의의 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 3
• 1. 주민참여의 개념‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 3
• 2. 주민참여의 필요성 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 6
• 3. 주민참여의 기능 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 9
• 4. 주민참여의 단계 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 12
• 제2절 주민참여의 긍정론과 부정론 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 16
• 1. 주민참여의 긍정론 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 16
• 2. 주민참여의 부정론 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 18
• 제3절 주민참여의 제유형과 성공요인 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 20
• 1. 주민참여의 제유형 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 20
• 2. 주민참여의 성공요인 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 27
• 제3장 한국 및 외국의 주민참여 제도와 현황 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 32
• 제1절 한국의 주민참여 제도와 현황 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 32
• 1. 위원회 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 33
• 2. 반상회 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 34
• 3. 공청회 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 36
• 4. 민간단체 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 37
• 5. 민원 및 청원 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 38
• 6. 주민투표 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 38
• 7. 주민자치센터 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 39
• 제2절 외국의 주민참여 제도와 현황 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 43
• 1. 미국 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 43
• 2. 영국 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 45
• 3. 일본 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 46
• 4. 독일 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 50
• 제 4 장 주민참여 실태분석 및 문제점도출 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 51
• 제 1절 주민참여 실태분석 및 문제점도출‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 51
• 1. 공무원의 의식결여 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 51
• 2. 참여행정에 대한 주민들의 인식 부족 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 53
• 3. 행정정보공개의 부족 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 54
• 4. 제도의 형식적 운영 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 57
• 5. 관 주도에 의한 동원된 주민참여 관행 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 58
• 제 5 장 주민참여 활성화방안 및 결론‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 60
• 제1절 주민참여 활성화방안 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 60
• 1. 주민과 공무원의 의식개선 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 60
• 2. 행정정보 공개 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 63
• 3. 주민참여제도의 활성화 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 64
• 4. 주민자치센터 활성화 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 67
• 5. 인터넷을 활용한 주민참여 확대 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 67
• 6. 자원봉사의 활성화 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 68
• 제2절 결론 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 69
• 참고문헌 ‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥‥ 71